Mapping academic institutions according to their journal publication profile: Spanish universities as a case study

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 63, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 2328-2340

  Garcia J A ^a   Rodríguez Sánchez, Rosa ^a   Fdez Valdivia, J ^a   Robinson Garcia N ^a   Torres Salinas, D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

bibliometrics

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS; ACADEMIC JOURNAL; AGGLOMERATIVE HIERARCHICAL CLUSTERING; BIBLIOMETRICS; DENDROGRAMS; DESCRIPTORS; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; JOURNAL PUBLICATION; NOVEL METHODOLOGY; SCIENTIFIC FIELDS; STUDY SAMPLES;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; PUBLISHING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84868199823     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.22735     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ahlgren, P., &, Colliander, C., (2009). Document-document similarity approaches and science mapping: Experimental comparison of five approaches. Journal of Informetrics, 3 (1), 49-63.
2. Ahlgren, P., &, Colliander, C., (2012). Experimental comparison of first and second-order similarities in a scientometric context. Scientometrics, 90 (2), 675-685.
3. Baeza-Yates, R.A., &, Ribeiro-Neto, B.A., (1999). Modern information retrieval. Harlow, UK: Addison-Wesley.
4. Everitt, B., Landau, S., &, Leese, M., (2001). Cluster analysis (4th ed.). London: Arnold.
5. García, J.A., Rodríguez-Sánchez, R., Fdez-Valdivia, J., &, Martínez-Baena, J., (2012a). On first quartile journals which are not of highest impact. Scientometrics, 90 (3), 925-943.
6. García, J.A., Rodríguez-Sánchez, R., Fdez-Valdivia, J., Torres-Salinas, D., &, Herrera, F., (2012b). Ranking of research output of universities on the basis of the multidimensional prestige of influential fields: Spanish universities as a case study. Scientometrics [Epub ahead of print].
7. Gmür, M., (2003). Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics, 57 (1), 27-57.
8. Gomez, I., Bordons, M., Teresa-Fernández, M., &, Morillo, F., (2009). Structure and research performance of Spanish universities. Scientometrics, 79 (1), 131-146.
9. Griffith, B.C., Small, H.G., Stonehill, J.A., &, Dey, S., (1974). Structure of scientific literatures. 2. Toward a macrostructure and microstructure for science. Science Studies, 4 (4), 339-365.
10. Hazelkorn, E., (2011). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. Basingstoke, UK, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
11. Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan. (2011). Performance ranking of scientific papers for world universities. Retrieved from: http://ranking.heeact.edu.tw/en-us/2011/Page/Methodology
12. Kamada-Kawai, S., (1998). A simple method for computing general position in displaying three-dimensional objects. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 41 (1), 43-56.
13. Klavans, R., &, Boyack, K.W., (2009). Toward a consensus map of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (3), 455-476.
14. Leydesdorff, L., &, Persson, O., (2010). Mapping the geography of science: distribution patterns and networks of relations among cities and institutions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (8), 1622-1634.
15. Leydesdorff, L., &, Rafols, I., (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (2), 348-369.
16. Lopez-Illescas, C., Moya-Anegon, F., &, Moed, H.F., (2011). A ranking of universities should account for differences in their disciplinary specialization. Scientometrics, 88 (2), 563-574.
17. MathWorks. (2012). Statistics toolbox. Available from: http://www.mathworks.es/help/toolbox/stats/linkage.html
18. Moed, H.F., Moya-Anegon, F., Lopez-Illescas, C., &, Visser, M., (2011). Is concentration of university research associated with better research performance? Journal of Informetrics, 5 (4), 649-658.
19. Moya-Anegon, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Herrero-Solana, V., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Alvarez, E., &, Muñoz- Fernández, F.J., (2004). A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the co-citation of classes and categories. Scientometrics, 61 (1), 129-145.
20. Moya-Anegon, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Alvarez, E., Muñoz-Fernández, F.J., &, Herrero-Solana, V., (2007). Visualizing the marrow of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (14), 2167-2179.
21. Narin, F., Carpenter, M., &, Berlt, N.C., (1972). Interrelationships of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 23 (5), 323-331.
22. Networks/Pajek. (2011). Available from: http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/ networks/pajek/
23. Noyons, C., (2004). Science maps within a science policy context. In, H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, &, U. Schmochl,. (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 237-255). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. Noyons, E.C.M., Moed, H.F., &, Luwel, M., (1999). Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometricstudy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50 (2), 115-131.
25. Ortega, J.L., Aguillo, I., Cothey, V., &, Scharnhorst, A., (2008). Maps of the academic web in the European Higher Education Area - An exploration of visual web indicators. Scientometrics, 74 (2), 295-308.
26. Rafols, I., Porter, A.L., &, Leydesdorff, L., (2010). Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (9), 1871-1887.
27. Rorissa, A., &, Yuan, X., (2012). Visualizing and mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 48 (1), 120-135.
28. Salton, G., &, Buckley, C., (1988). Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 24 (5), 513-523.
29. Shanghai Jiao Tong University. (2011). Academic ranking of world universities (ARWU). Retrieved from: http://www.arwu.org/index.js
30. Shin, J.C., (2009). Classifying higher education institutions in Korea: A performance-based approach. Higher Education, 57 (2), 247-266.
31. Small, H., (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50 (9), 799-813.
32. Small, H., &, Garfield, E., (1985). The geography of science: Disciplinary and national mappings. Journal of Information Science, 11 (4), 147-159.
33. Torres-Salinas, D., (2009). Evaluacion bibliométrica de universidades con Scival de Elsevier. El Profesional de la Informacion, 18 (6), 669-674.
34. Torres-Salinas, D., Delgado-Lopez-Cozar, E., Moreno-Torres, J.G., &, Herrera, F., (2011). Rankings ISI de las universidades españolas por campos científicos: descripcion y resultados. El Profesional de la Informacion, 20 (1), 111-122.
35. Torres-Salinas, D., Moreno-Torres, J.G., Robinson-García, N., Delgado-Lopez-Cozar, E., &, Herrera, F., (2011a). Rankings ISI de las universidades españolas según campos y disciplinas científicas (2 ed. 2011). El Profesional de la Informacion, 20 (6), 701-711.
36. Torres-Salinas, D., Moreno-Torres, J.G., Delgado-Lopez-Cozar, E., &, Herrera, F., (2011b). A methodology for institution-field ranking based on a bidimensional analysis: The IFQ2A index. Scientometrics, 88 (3), 771-786.
37. Van der Wende, M., &, Westerheijden, D., (2009). Rankings and classifications: the need for a multidimensional approach. In, F. van Vught, (Ed.), Mapping the higher education landscape (pp. 71-86). New York: Springer.
38. Van Raan, A.F.J., (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62 (1), 133-143.