Combining Next-Generation Sequencing and Microarray Technology into a Transcriptomics Approach for the Non-Model Organism Chironomus riparius

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 10, 2012, Pages

  Marinković, Marino ^a,b   de Leeuw, Wim C ^a,c   de Jong, Mark ^a,c   Kraak, Michiel H S ^b   Admiraal, Wim ^b   Breit, Timo M ^a,c   Jonker, Martijs J ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c NETHERLANDS BIOINFORMATICS CENTRE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; MESSENGER RNA;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CHIRONOMIDAE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE LIBRARY; GENETIC PROCEDURES; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR PROBE; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY; TRANSCRIPTOMICS;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; CHIRONOMIDAE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DATABASES, GENETIC; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE LIBRARY; GENOME; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; RNA, MESSENGER; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; TRANSCRIPTOME;

CERATOPOGONIDAE; CHIRONOMUS RIPARIUS;

EID: 84868158929     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048096     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, Brown PO, (1995) Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 270: 467-470.
2. MAQC Consortium, (2006) The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements. Nat Biotechnol 24: 1151-1161.
3. Shendure J, (2008) The beginning of the end for microarrays? Nat Methods 5: 585-587.
4. Hanssen KD, Wu Z, Irizarry RA, Leek JT, (2011) Sequencing technology does not eliminate biological variability. Nat Biotechnol 29: 572-573.
5. van 't Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Hart AAM, et al. (2002) Gene expression profiling predicts outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415: 530-536.
6. Neumann NF, Galvez F, (2002) DNA microarrays and toxicogenomics: applications for ecotoxicology? Biotechnol Adv. 20: 391-419.
7. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, et al. (2005) Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437: 376-380.
8. Ekblom R, Galindo J, (2011) Applications of next generation sequencing in molecular ecology of non-model organisms. Heredity 107: 1-15.
9. Vera JC, Wheat CW, Fescemyer HW, Frilander MJ, Crawford DL, et al. (2008) Rapid transcriptome characterization for a nonmodel organism using 454 pyrosequencing. Mol Ecol. 17: 1636-1647.
10. Garcia-Reyero N, Griffitt RJ, Liu L, Kroll KJ, Farmerie WG, et al. (2008) Construction of a robust microarray from a non-model species largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides (Lacèpede), using pyrosequencing technology. J Fish Biol. 72: 2354-2376.
11. Bellin D, Ferrarini A, Chimento A, Kaiser O, Levenkova N, et al. (2009) Combining next-generation pyrosequencing with microarray for large scale expression analysis in non-model species. BMC Genomics 10: 555.
12. Gong P, Pirooznia M, Guan X, Perkins EJ, (2010) Design, validation and annotation of transcriptome-wide oligonucleotide probes for the oligochaete annelid Eisenia fetida. PloS ONE 5: e14266.
13. Milan M, Coppe A, Reinhardt R, Cancela LM, Leite RB, et al. (2011) Transcriptome sequencing and microarray development for the Manila clam, Ruditapes philippinarum: genomic tools for environmental monitoring. BMC Genomics 12: 234.
14. Bass C, Hebsgaard MB, Hughes J, (2012) Genomic resources for the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens: Transcriptome pyrosequencing and microarray design. Insect Sci. 19: 1-12.
15. Kumar S, Blaxter ML, (2010) Comparing de novo assemblers for 454 transcriptome data. BMC Genomics 11: 571.
16. Mundry M, Bornberg-Bauer E, Sammeth M, Feulner PGD, (2012) Evaluating characteristics of de novo assembly software on 454 transcriptome data: a simulation approach. PloS ONE 7: e31410.
17. Miller JR, Koren S, Sutton G, (2011) Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing data. Genomics. 95: 315-327.
18. Gilles A, Meglécz E, Pech N, Ferreira S, Malausa T, et al. (2011) Accuracy and quality assessment of 454 GS-FLX Titanium pyrosequencing. BMC Genomics 12: 245.
19. Longo MS, O'Neill MJ, O'Neill RJ, (2011) Abundant human DNA contamination identified in non-primate genome databases. PLoS ONE 6: e16410.
20. Schmieder R, Edwards R, (2011) Fast identification and removal of sequence contamination from genomic and metagenomic datasets. PLoS one 6: e17288.
21. Götz S, Garcia-Gómez JM, Terol J, Williams TD, Nagaraj SH, et al. (2008) High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 3420-3435.
22. Lettieri T, (2006) Recent applications of DNA microarray technology to toxicology and ecotoxicology. Environ Health Perspect. 114: 4-9.
23. van Straalen NM, Feder ME, (2012) Ecological and evolutionary functional genomics- How can it contribute to the risk assessment of chemicals? Environ Sci Technol. 46: 3-9.
24. Nair PMG, Park SY, Choi J, (2011) Analyses of expressed sequence tags from Chironomus riparius using pyrosequencing: molecular ecotoxicology perspective. Environ. Health Toxicol. 26: e2011010.
25. Armitage PD, Cranston PS, Pinder LCV (1995) The Chironomidae: biology and ecology of non-biting midges. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
26. Armitage PD, Moss O, Wright JF, Furse MT, (1983) The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Water Res. 17: 333-347.
27. Gabriels W, Lock K, de Pauw N, Goethals PLM, (2010) Multimetric Macroinvertebrate Index Flanders (MMIF) for biological assessment of rivers and lakes in Flanders (Belgium). Limnologica 40: 199-207.
28. León Paumen M, Borgman E, Kraak MHS, van Gestel CAM, Admiraal W, (2008) Life cycle responses of the midge Chironomus riparius to polycyclic aromatic compound exposure. Environ Pollut. 152: 225-232.
29. Marinković M, Verweij RA, Nummerdor GA, Jonker MJ, Kraak MHS, Admiraal W, (2011) Life cycle responses of the midge Chironomus riparius to compounds with different modes of action. Envrion Sci Technol. 45: 1645-1651.
30. OECD (2004a) Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 218: Sediment-water chironomid toxicity using spiked sediment. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
31. OECD (2004b) Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 219: Sediment-water chironomid toxicity using spiked water. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
32. OECD (2010) Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 233: Sediment-Water chironomid life-cycle toxicity test using spiked water or spiked sediment. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
33. OECD (2011) Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 235: Chironomus sp., acute immobilisation test. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
34. Traas TP, van Leeuwen CJ (2007) Ecotoxicological Effects. In: van Leeuwen CJ, Vermeire TG, editors. Risk assessment of chemicals: An introduction, 2nd ed. Springer: Dordrecht, the Netherlands. 281-347.
35. Steiner G, Suter L, Boess F, Gasser R, de Vera MC, et al. (2004) Discriminating different classes of toxicants by transcript profiling. Environ Health Perspect. 112: 1236-1248.
36. Swain S, Wren JF, Stürzenbaum SR, Kille P, Morgan J, et al. (2010) Linking toxicant physiological mode of action with induced gene expression changes in Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Syst Biol. 4: 32.
37. Martin JA, Wang Z, (2011) Next-generation transcriptome assembly. Nat Rev Genet 12: 671-682.
38. Meyer E, Aglyamova GV, Wang S, Buchanan-Carter J, Abrego D, et al. (2009) Sequencing and de novo analysis of a coral larval transcriptome using 454GSFlx. BMC Genomcis 10: 219.
39. Ewen-Campen B, Shaner N, Panfilio KA, Suzuki Y, Roth S, et al. (2011) The maternal and early embryonic transcriptome of the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus. BMC Genomics 12: 61.
40. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, et al. (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25: 25-29.
41. Severson DW, Behura SK, (2012) Mosquito genomics: progress and challenges. Annu Rev Entomol. 57: 143-66.
42. Ogata H, Goto S, Sato K, Fujibuchi W, Bono H, et al. (1999) KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 27: 29-34.
43. Boonstra M, Asselman M, Maas P, Verweij RA, Breeuwer JAJ, et al. (2009) Persistence of chironomids in metal polluted environments. Proc Neth Entomol Soc Meet. 20: 9-15.
44. Conesa A, Götz S, Garcia-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talon M, et al. (2005) Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21: 3674-3676.
45. Brunner J, Wittink FRA, Jonker MJ, de Jong M, Breit TM, et al. (2010) The core genome of the anaerobic oral pathogenic bacterium Porphyromonas gingivalis. BMC Microbiol 10: 252.