The impact of stocking on the current ancestry in twenty native and introduced muskellunge populations in minnesota

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 141, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1411-1423

  Miller, Loren M ^a,b   Mero, Steven W ^a   Younk, Jerry A ^a  

^a MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION GENETICS; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; SIZE STRUCTURE; STOCKING DENSITY;

IOWA; MINNESOTA; UNITED STATES; WISCONSIN;

ESOX MASQUINONGY; HIRUDINIDA;

EID: 84868151158     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2012.697092     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bevelhimer, M. S., R. A. Stein, and R. F. Carline. 1985. Assessing significance of physiological differences among three esocids with a bioenergetics model. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 42:57-69.
2. Bronte, C. R., M. E. Holey, C. P. Madenjian, J. L. Jonas, R. M. Claramunt, P. C. McKee, M. L. Toneys, M. P. Ebener, B. Breidert, G. W. Fleischer, R. Hess, A. W. Martell Jr., and E. J. Olsen. 2007. Relative abundance, site fidelity, and survival of adult lake trout in Lake Michigan from 1999 to 2001: implications for future restoration strategies. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 27:137-155.
3. Clapp, D. F., and D. H. Wahl. 1996. Comparison of food consumption, growth, and metabolism among muskellunge: an investigation of population differentiation. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 125:402-410.
4. Crozier, W. W., I. J. J. Moffett, and G. J. A. Kennedy. 1997. Comparative performance of native and non-native strains of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) ranched from the River Bush, Northern Ireland. Fisheries Research 32: 81-88.
5. DeKoning, J., K. Keatley, R. Phillips, J. Rhydderch, J. Janssen, and M. Noakes. 2006. Genetic analysis of wild lake trout embryos recovered from Lake Michigan. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 135:399-407.
6. Dombeck, M. P., B. W. Menzel, and P. N. Hinz. 1986. Natural muskellunge reproduction in Midwestern lakes. Pages 122-134 in G. E. Hall, editor. Managing muskies: a treatise on the biology and propagation of muskellunge in North America. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
7. Eldridge, W. H., M. D. Bacigalupi, I. R. Adelman, L. M. Miller, and A. R. Kapuscinski. 2002. Determination of relative survival of two stocked walleye populations and resident natural-origin fish by microsatellite DNA parentage assignment. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59:282-290.
8. Evans, D. O., and C. C. Willox. 1991. Loss of exploited, indigenous populations of lake trouts, Salvelinus namaycush, by stocking of non-native stocks. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48(Supplement 1):134-147.
9. Fields, R. D., M. D. G. Desjardins, J. M. Hudson, T. W. Kassler, J. B. Ludden, J. V. Tranquilli, C. A. Toline, and D. P. Philipp. 1997. Genetic analyses of fish species in the upper Midwest. Center for Aquatic Ecology, Illinois Natural History Survey, Final Report to the Minnesota and Wisconsin Departments of Natural Resources, Champaign, Illinois.
10. Finnegan, A. K., and J. R. Stevens. 2008. Assessing the long-term genetic impact of historical stocking events on contemporary populations of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Fisheries Management and Ecology 15:315-326.
11. Fitzgerald, T. J., T. L. Margenau, and F. A. Copes. 1997. Muskellunge scale interpretation: the question of aging accuracy. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 17:206-209.
12. Frohnauer, N. K., C. L. Pierce, and L.W. Kallemeyn. 2007. Population dynamics and angler exploitation of the unique muskellunge population in Shoepack Lake, Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 27:63-76.
13. Goudet, J. 1995. FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate Fstatistics. Journal of Heredity 86:485-486.
14. Guo, S. W., and E. A. Thompson. 1992. Performing the exact test of Hardy- Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48:361-372.
15. Halbisen, M. A., and C. C. Wilson. 2009. Variable introgression from supplemental stocking in southern Ontario populations of lake trout. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138:699-719.
16. Halverson, M. A. 2008. Stocking trends: a quantitative review of governmental fish stocking in the United States, 1931 to 2004. Fisheries 33:69-75.
17. Hansen, M. M., and K. L. D. Mensberg. 2009. Admixture analysis of stocked brown trout populations using mapped microsatellite DNA markers: indigenous trout persist in introgressed populations. Biology Letters 5:656-659.
18. Hanson, D. A. 1986. Population characteristics and angler use of muskellunge in eight northern Wisconsin lakes. Pages 238-248 in G. E. Hall, editor. Managing muskies: a treatise on the biology and propagation of muskellunge in North America. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
19. Hedrick, P. W. 2005. Genetics of populations. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, Massachusetts.
20. Hindar, K., N. Ryman, and F. Utter. 1991. Genetic effects of cultured fish on natural fish populations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:945-957.
21. Jennings, M. J., B. L. Sloss, G. R. Hetzenbeler, J. M. Kampa, T. D. Simonson, S. P. AveLallemant, G. A. Lindenberger, and B. D. Underwood. 2010. Implementation of genetic conservation practices in a muskellunge propagation and stocking program. Fisheries 35:388-395.
22. Kerr, S. J. 2007. Characteristics of Ontario muskellunge (Esox masquinongy) fisheries based on volunteer angler diary information. Environmental Biology of Fishes 79:61-69.
23. Koppelman, J. B., and D. P. Philipp. 1986. Genetic applications in muskellunge management. Pages 111-121 in G. E. Hall, editor. Managing muskies: a treatise on the biology and propagation of muskellunge in North America. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
24. Larsen, P. F., M. M. Hansen, E. E. Nielsen, L. F. Jensen, and V. Loeschcke. 2005. Stocking impact and temporal stability of genetic composition in a brackish northern pike population (Esox lucius L.), assessed using microsatellite DNA analysis of historical and contemporary samples. Heredity 95: 136-143.
25. Launey, S., J. Morin, S. Minery, and J. Laroche. 2006. Microsatellite genetic variation reveals extensive introgression between wild and introduced stocks, and a new evolutionary unit in French pike Esox lucius L. Journal of Fish Biology 68(Supplement B):193-216.
26. Madeira, M. J., B. J. Ǵomez-Moliner, and A. M. Barb́e. 2005. Genetic introgression on freshwater fish populations caused by restocking programmes. Biological Invasions 7:117-125.
27. Margenau, T. L. 1999. Muskellunge stocking strategies in Wisconsin: the first century and beyond. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:223-229.
28. Margenau, T. L., and S. P. AveLallemant. 2000. Effects of a 40-inch minimum length limit on muskellunge in Wisconsin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 20:986-993.
29. Margenau, T. L., and D. A. Hanson. 1996. Survival and growth of stocked muskellunge: effects of genetic and environmental factors. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Research Report 172, Madison. MDC (Minnesota Department of Conservation). 1934. Second biennial report: fiscal years 1933-1934. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
30. MGFC (Minnesota Game and Fish Commission). 1912. Biennial report of the board of game and fish commissioners of Minnesota for the biennial period ending July 31st, 1912. Syndicate Printing, Minneapolis.
31. Miller, L.M., S.W. Mero, and J. A. Younk. 2009. The genetic legacy of stocking muskellunge in a northern Minnesota lake. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138:602-615.
32. Olson, D. E., and P. K. Cunningham. 1989. Sport-fisheries trends shown by an annual Minnesota fishing contest over a 58-year period. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 9:287-297.
33. Philipp, D. P., S. J. Cooke, J. E. Claussen, J. B. Koppelman, C. D. Suski, and D. P. Burkett. 2009. Selection for vulnerability to angling in largemouth bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138:189-199.
34. Piller, K. R., C. C.Wilson, C. E. Lee, and J. Lyons. 2005. Conservation genetics of inland lake trout in the upper Mississippi River basin: stocked or native ancestry? Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134:789-802.
35. Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens, and P. Donnelly. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945-959.
36. Pritchard, J. K., W. Wen, and D. Falush. 2010. Documentation for STRUCTURE software: version 2.3. Pritchard Lab, University of Chicago,Chicago. Available: pritch.bsd.uchicago.edu. (February 2010).
37. Raymond, M., and F. Rousset. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal ofHeredity 86:248-249.
38. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
39. Rider, S. J. 2006. Restoration and conservation plan for the southern walleye in Alabama. Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries Division, Montgomery.
40. Rust, A. J., J. S. Diana, T. L. Margenau, and C. J. Edwards. 2002. Lake characteristics influencing spawning success of muskellunge in northernWisconsin lakes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:834-841.
41. Sloss, B. L., R. P. Franckowiak, and E. L. Murphy. 2008. Development of new microsatellite loci and multiplex reactions for muskellunge (Esox masquinongy). Molecular Ecology Resources 8:811-813.
42. Spies, I. B., E. C. Anderson, K. Naish, and P. Bentzen. 2007. Evidence for the existence of a native population of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) and subsequent introgression with introduced populations in a Pacific Northwest watershed. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64:1209-1221.
43. Utter, F. 2003. Genetic impacts of fish introductions. Pages 357-378 in E. M. Hallerman, editor. Population genetics: principles and applicatons for fisheries scientists. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
44. Van Oosterhout, C., W. F. Hutchinson, D. P. M. Wills, and P. Shipley. 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4:535-538.
45. Wahl, D. H. 1999. An ecological context for evaluating the factors influencing muskellunge stocking success. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:238-248.
46. Wahl, D. H., and R. A. Stein. 1988. Selective predation by three esocids: the role of prey behavior andmorphology. Transactions of theAmerican Fisheries Society 117:142-151.
47. Wahl, D. H., and R. A. Stein. 1991. Food consumption and growth of three esocids: field tests of a bioenergetic model. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 120:230-246.
48. Wahl, D. H., and R. A. Stein. 1993. Comparative population characteristics of muskellunge (Esox masquinongy), northern pike (E. lucius), and their hybrid (E. masquinongy × E. lucius). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50:1961-1968.
49. Welsh, A. B., R. F. Elliott, K. T. Scribner, H. R. Quinlan, E. A. Baker, B. T. Eggold, J. M. Holtgren, C. C. Krueger, and B.May. 2010. Genetic guidelines for the stocking of lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) in the Great Lakes basin. Great Lakes Fishery Commission, Miscellaneous Publication 2010-01, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
50. Wills, T. C. 2006. Comparative abundance, survival, and growth of one wild and two domestic brown trout strains stocked in Michigan rivers. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 26:535-544.
51. Wilson, C. C., M. Lavender, and J. Black. 2007. Genetic assessment of walleye (Sander vitreus) restoration efforts and options in Nipigon Bay and Black Bay, Lake Superior. Journal of Great Lakes Research 33(Supplement 1):133-144.
52. Wingate, P. J., and J. A. Younk. 2007. A program for successful muskellunge management-a Minnesota success story. Environmental Biology of Fishes 79:163-169.
53. Younk, J. A., and D. L. Pereira. 2003. An examination of Minnesota's muskellunge waters. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fisheries Investigational Report 498.
54. Younk, J. A., and R. F. Strand. 1992. Performance evaluation of four muskellunge Esox masquinongy strains in two Minnesota lakes. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Section of Fisheries Investigational Report 418.