Implementation of genetic conservation practices in a muskellunge propagation and stocking program;Implementación de prácticas genéticas de conservación dentro de un programa de crianza y propagación del lucio rayado

Fisheries

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 388-395

  Jennings, Martin J ^a   Sloss, Brian L ^b   Hatzenbeler, Gene R ^a   Kampa, Jeffrey M ^a   Simonson, Timothy D ^c   Avelallemant, Steven P ^d   Lindenberger, Gary A ^e   Underwood, Bruce D ^e  

^a Bureau of Science Services   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STEVENS POINT   (United States)

^c WDNR   (United States)

^d WDNR   (United States)

^e NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESOX MASQUINONGY; PISCES;

EID: 77957673349     PISSN: 03632415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8446-35.8.388     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allendorf, F. W. and G. Luikart. 2007. Conservation and the geneticsof populations. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Massachusetts.
2. Crossman, E. J. 1990. Reproductive homing in muskellunge, Esoxmasquinongy. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences47:1803-1812.
3. Drauch, A. M., and O. E. Rhodes, Jr. 2007. Genetic evaluationof the lake sturgeon reintroduction program in the Mississippiand Missouri Rivers. North American Journal of FisheriesManagement 27:434-442.
4. Fields, R. D., M. D. G. Desjardins, J. M. Hudson, T. W. Kassler, J. B. Ludden, J.V. Tranquilli, C. A. Toline, and D. P. Philipp.1997. Genetic analyses of fish species in the upper Midwest. IllinoisNatural History Survey Aquatic Ecology Technical Report 97/5.
5. George, A. L., B. R. Kuhada, J. D. Williams, M. A. Cantrell, P.L. Rakes, and J. R. Shute. 2009. Guidelines for propagationand translocation for freshwater fish conservation. Fisheries34(11):529-545.
6. Hanson, D. A. 1986. Population characteristics and angler useof muskellunge in eight northern Wisconsin lakes. AmericanFisheries Society Special Publication 15:238-248.
7. Hedrick, P. W. 2000. Genetics of populations, 2nd edition. Jones andBartlett, Sudbury, Massachusetts.
8. Jennings, M. J., J. E. Claussen, and D. P. Philipp. 1996. Evidencefor heritable preferences for spawning habitat between two walleyepopulations. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society125:978-982.
9. Jennings, M. J., G. R. Hatzenbeler, and J. M. Kampa. 2009. Oneyearretention of passive integrated transponders in adult muskellunge,and applications to broodstock management. NorthAmerican Journal of Aquaculture 71:330-332.
10. Johnson, L. D. 1958. Pond culture of muskellunge in Wisconsin.Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin17.
11. Margenau, T. L. 1999. Muskellunge stocking strategies in Wisconsin:the first century and beyond. North American Journal of FisheriesManagement 19:223-229.
12. Margenau, T. L., and S. P. AveLallemant. 2000. Effects of a 40-inchminimum length limit on muskellunge in Wisconsin. NorthAmerican Journal of Fisheries Management 20:986-993, 2000.
13. Miller, L. M., and A. R. Kapuscinski. 2003. Genetic guidelinesfor hatchery supplementation programs. Pages 329-355 in E. M.Hallerman, ed. Population genetics: principles and applicationsfor fisheries scientists. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda,Maryland.
14. Page, K. S., K. T. Scribner, D. Bast, M. E. Holey, and M. K.Burnham-Curtis. 2005. Genetic evaluation of a Great Lakes laketrout hatchery program. Transactions of the American FisheriesSociety 134:872-891.
15. Philipp, D. P., J. M. Epifanio, and M. J. Jennings. 1993. Point/counterpoint: conservation genetics and current stocking practices-are they compatible? Fisheries 18(12):14-18.
16. Pierce, R. B., J. A. Younk, and C. M. Tomcko. 2007. Expulsionof miniature radio transmitters along with eggs of muskellungeand northern pike-a new method for locating critical spawninghabitat. Environmental Biology of Fishes 79:99-109.
17. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution43:223-225.
18. Rousset, F. 2008. Genepop'007: a complete reimplementation of theGenepop software for Windows and Linux. Molecular EcologyResources 8: 103-106.
19. Sloss, B. L., R. P. Franckowiak, and E. L. Murphy. 2008.Development of new microsatellite loci and multiplex reactionsfor muskellunge (Esox masquinongy). Molecular Ecology Resources8:811-813.
20. Stewart, D. C., G. W. Smith, and A. F. Youngson. 2002. Tributaryspecificvariation in timing of return of adult Atlantic salmon(Salmo salar) to fresh water has a genetic component. CanadianJournal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59:276-281.
21. Templeton, A. R. 1986. Coadaptation and outbreeding depression.Pages 105-166 in M. Soulé, ed. Conservation biology: the scienceof scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland,Massachusetts.
22. Waples, R. S., G.A. Winans, F. M. Utter, and C. Mahnken. 1990.Genetic approaches to management of Pacific salmon. Fisheries15(5):19-25.
23. Waser, N. M. 1993. Population structure, optimal outbreeding,and assortative mating in angiosperms. 173-199 in N. M.Thornhill, ed. The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding:theoretical and empirical perspectives. University of ChicagoPress, Chicago, Illinois.
24. WDNR (Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources). 1996.Wisconsin muskellunge waters. Publication RS-919 (1996 revision).WDNR, Madison.
25. Wingate, P. J., and J. A. Younk. 2007. A program for successful muskellungemanagement: a Minnesota success story. EnvironmentalBiology of Fishes 79:163-169.