Phylogeny of carex subg. vignea (cyperaceae) based on amplified fragment length polymorphism and nrDNA Data

Systematic Botany

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 913-925

  Ford, Bruce A ^a   Ghazvini, Habibollah ^a,e   Naczi, Robert F C ^b   Starr, Julian R ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^d CANADIAN MUSEUM OF NATURE   (Canada)

^e SEED AND PLANT IMPROVEMENT INSTITUTE   (Iran)

Author keywords

AFLP; Carex; Cariceae; ITS and ETS 1f sequences; mixed datasets; nrDNA

Indexed keywords

CAREX; CYPERACEAE;

EID: 84868151100     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 15482324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364412X656464     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Albach, D. C. 2007. Amplified fragment length polymorphisms and sequence data in the phylogenetic analysis of polyploids: multiple origins of Veronica cymbalaria (Plantaginaceae). The New Phytologist 176: 481-498.
2. Alfaro, M. E., S. Zoller, and F. Lutzoni. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 255-266.
3. Ball, P. W. and A. A. Reznicek. 2002. Carex. Pp. 254-572 in Flora of North America, north of Mexico, volume 23, ed. Flora of North America Editorial Committee. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Banfer, G., B. Fiala, and K. Weisling. 2004. AFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships among myrmecophytic species of Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae) and their allies. Plant Systematics and Evolution 249: 213-231.
5. Benham, J. J. 2001. Genographer 1.6.0. Bozeman: Montana State University.
6. Cochrane, T. S. 2002. Carex Linnaeus sect. Heleoglochin Dumortier. Pp. 278-281 in Flora of North America, north of Mexico, vol. 23, ed. Flora of North America Editorial Committee. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. DeBry, R. W. and R. G. Olmstead. 2000. A simulation study of reduced tree-search effort in bootstrap resampling analysis. Systematic Biology 49: 171-179.
8. Despres, L., L. Gielly, B. Redoutet, and P. Taberlet. 2003. Using AFLP to resolve phylogenetic relationships in a morphologically diversified plant species complex when nuclear and chloroplast sequences fail to reveal variability. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 27: 185-196.
9. Egorova, T. V. 1999. The sedges (Carex L.) of Russia and adjacent states (within the limits of the former USSR). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State Chemical-Pharmaceutical Academy and St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
10. Erixon, P., B. Svennblad, T. Britton, and B. Oxelman. 2003. Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 52: 665-673.
11. Escudero, M., P. Vargas, V. Valcarcel, and M. Lucen o. 2008. Strait of Gibraltar: an effective gene-flow barrier for wind-pollinated Carex helodes (Cyperaceae) as revealed by DNA sequences, AFLP, and cytogenetic variation. American Journal of Botany 95: 745-755.
12. Farris, J. S., M. Kallersjo, A. J. Kluge, and C. Bult. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
13. Felsenstein, J. 1992. Phylogenies fromrestriction sites: amaximum-likelihood approach. Evolution 46: 159-173.
14. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray's manual of botany. 8th edition. New York: American Book Co.
15. Ford, B. A., M. Iranpour, R. F. C. Naczi, J. R. Starr, and C. A. Jerome. 2006a. Phylogeny of Carex subg. Vignea (Cyperaceae) based on noncoding nrDNA sequence data. Systematic Botany 31: 70-82.
16. Ford, B. A., R. F. C. Naczi, H. Ghazvini, and M. Iranpour. 2006b. Amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis reveals three distinct taxa in Carex digitalis sect. Careyanae (Cyperaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 84: 1444-1452.
17. Ford, B. A., A. C. Worley, R. F. C. Naczi, and H. Ghazvini. 2009. Amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis reveals high genetic variation in the Ouachita Mountain endemic Carex latebracteata (Cyperaceae). Botany 87: 770-779.
18. Frodin, D. G. 2004. History and concepts of big plant genera. Taxon 53: 753-776.
19. Gottlieb, A. M., G. C. Giberti, and L. Poggio. 2005. Molecular analyses of the genus Ilex (Aquifoliaceae) in southern South America, evidence from AFLP and ITS sequence data. American Journal of Botany 92: 352-369.
20. Hendrichs, M., S. Michalski, D. Begerow, F. Oberwinkler, and F. H. Hellwig. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships in Carex, subgenus Vignea (Cyperaceae), based on ITS sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 246: 109-125.
21. Hipp, A. E., A. A. Reznicek, P. E. Rothrock, and J. A. Webber. 2006a. Phylogeny and classification of Carex section Ovales (Cyperaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 167: 1029-1048.
22. Hipp, A. L., P. E. Rothrock, A. A. Reznicek, and P. E. Berry. 2006b. Chromosome number changes associated with speciation in sedges: a phylogenetic study in Carex section Ovales (Cyperaceae) using AFLP data. Aliso 23: 193-203.
23. King, M. G. and E. H. Roalson. 2008. Exploring evolutionary dynamics of nrDNA in Carex subgenus Vignea (Cyperaceae). Systematic Botany 33: 514-524.
24. Koopman, W. J. M. 2005. Phylogenetic signal in AFLP data sets. Systematic Biology 54: 197-217.
25. Koopman, W. J. M., M. E. Guetta, C. C. M. Van De Wiel, B. Vosman, and R. G. Van den Berg. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships among Lactuca (Asteraceae) species and related genera based on ITS-1 DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany 85: 1517-1530.
26. Koopman, W. J. M., V. Wissemann, K. De Cock, J. Van Huylenbroeck, J. De Riek, G. J. H. Sabatino, D. Visser, B. Vosman, C. M. Ritz, B.Maes, G. Werlemark, H. Nybom, T. Debener, M. Linde, andM. J.M. Smulders. 2008. AFLP markers as a tool to reconstruct complex relationships: a case study in Rosa (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany 95: 353-366.
27. Koopman, W. J. M., M. J. Zevenbergen, and R. G. Van den Berg. 2001. Species relationships in Lactuca s. l. (Lactuceae, Asteraceae) inferred from AFLP fingerprints. American Journal of Botany 88: 1881-1887.
28. Lambertini, C., J. Frydenberg, M. H. G. Gustaffsson, and H. Brix. 2008. Herbarium specimens as a source of DNA for AFLP fingerprinting of Phragmites (Poaceae): possibilities and limitations. Plant Systematics and Evolution 272: 223-231.
29. Liang, S.-Y. and Y.-C. Tang. 1990. A conspectus and phytogeography of the genus Carex subgen. Vignea (P. Beauv) Kirsch. in China. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 28: 237-260.
30. Lunkai, D., L. Songyun, L. Song-jun, Z. Shuren, T. Yancheng, T. Yen-cheng, T. Koyama, and G. C. Tucker. 2010. Carex. Pp. 285-461 in Flora of China, volume 23, eds. W. Zhengyi, P. H. Raven, and H. Deyuan. Beijing: Science Press and St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
31. Mackenzie, K. K. 1935. Cyperaceae-Cariceae. North American Flora 18: 1-478.
32. McKinnon, G. E., R. E. Vaillancourt, D. A. Steane, and B. M. Potts. 2008. An AFLP marker approach to lower-level systematics in Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae). American Journal of Botany 95: 368-380.
33. Naczi, R. F. C. 2009. Insights on using morphologic data for phylogenetic analysis of sedges (Cyperaceae). Botanical Review 75: 67-95.
34. Nelmes, E. 1951. The genus Carex in Malaysia. Reinwardtia 1: 221-450.
35. Pearse, I. S. and A. L. Hipp. 2009. Phylogenetic and trait similarity to a native species predict herbivory on non-native oaks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106: 18097-18102.
36. Reznicek, A. A. 1990. Evolution in sedges (Carex, Cyperaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 1409-1432.
37. Reznicek, A. A. 2002. Carex Linnaeus sect. Stellulatae Kunth. Pp. 326-331 in Flora of North America, north of Mexico, vol. 23, ed. Flora of North America Editorial Committee. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Reznicek, A. A. and P. W. Ball. 1980. The taxonomy of Carex sect. Stellulatae in North America north of Mexico. Contributions from the University of Michigan Herbarium 14: 153-203.
39. Roalson, E. H., J. T. Columbus, and E. A. Friar. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships in Cariceae (Cyperaceae) based on ITS (nrDNA) and trnT-LF (cpDNA) region sequences: assessment of subgeneric and sectional relationships in Carex with emphasis on section Acrocystis. Systematic Botany 26: 318-341.
40. Rogers, S. O. and A. J. Bendich. 1985. Extraction of DNA from milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium and mummified plant tissues. Plant Molecular Biology 5: 69-76.
41. Ronquist, F., J. P. Huelsenbeck, and P. Van der Mark. 2005. MrBayes 3.1 Manual. Draft 26/05/2005. Available at: http://mrbayes.csit.fsu.edu/manual.php. Accessed 03/08/2010.
42. Schonswetter, P., J. Suda, M. Popp, H. Weiss-Schneeweiss, and C. Brochmann. 2007. Circumpolar phylogeography of Juncus biglumis (Juncaceae) inferred from AFLP fingerprints, cpDNA sequences, nuclear DNA content and chromosome numbers. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 42: 92-103.
43. Semerikov, V. L., H. Zhang, M. Sun, and M. Lascoux. 2003. Conflicting phylogenies of Larix (Pinaceae) based on cytoplasmic and nuclear DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 27: 173-184.
44. Simmons, M. P. and H. Ochoterena. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequencebased phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 49: 369-381.
45. Smith, T. W. and M. J. Waterway. 2008a. Evaluating species limits and hybridization in the Carex complanata complex using morphology, amplified fragment length polymorphisms, and restriction fragment analysis. Botany 86: 809-826.
46. Smith, T. W. and M. J. Waterway. 2008b. Evaluating the taxonomic status of the globally rare Carex roanensis and allied species using morphology and amplified fragment length polymorphisms. Systematic Botany 33: 525-535.
47. Song-Wang, S. 1994. Abnormal structures in the spikes of Carex gibba Wahl. (Carex subgen. Vignea). Cyperaceae Newsletter 13: 16-17.
48. Standley, L. A. 2002a. Carex Linnaeus sect. Vulpinae (Heuffel) H. Christ. Pp. 273-278 in Flora of North America, north of Mexico, vol. 23, ed. Flora of North America Editorial Committee. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Standley, L. A. 2002b. Carex Linnaeus sect. Multiflorae (J. Carey) Kukenthal. Pp. 281-285 in Flora of North America, north of Mexico, vol. 23, ed. Flora of North America Editorial Committee. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50. Starr, J. R. and B. A. Ford. 2009. Phylogeny and evolution in Cariceae (Cyperaceae): current knowledge and future directions. Botanical Review 75: 110-137.
51. Starr, J. R., R. J. Bayer, and B. A. Ford. 1999. The phylogenetic position of Carex section Phyllostachys and its implications for phylogeny and subgeneric circumscription in Carex (Cyperaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 563-577.
52. Starr, J. R., A. Harris, and D. A. Simpson. 2003. Potential of the 50 and 30 ends of the intergenic spacer (IGS) of rDNA in the Cyperaceae: new sequences for lower-level phylogenies in sedges with an example from Uncinia Pers. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 213-227.
53. Starr, J. R., A. Harris, and D. A. Simpson. 2004. Phylogeny of the unispicate taxa in Cyperaceae tribe Cariceae I. Generic relationships and evolutionary scenarios. Systematic Botany 29: 528-544.
54. Starr, J. R., A. Harris, and D. A. Simpson. 2008. Phylogeny of the unispicate taxa in Cyperaceae tribe Cariceae II: the limits of Uncinia in Sedges: Uses, diversity, and systematics of Cyperaceae, eds. R. F.C.Naczi and B. A. Ford. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 108: 243-267.
55. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony ( and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
56. Toivonen, H. 2002. Carex Linnaeus sect. Dispermae Ohwi. Pp. 298 in Flora of North America, north of Mexico, vol. 23, ed. Flora of North America Editorial Committee. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Voss, E. G. 1972. Michigan Flora. Part 1. Bloomfield Hills: Cranbrook Institute of Science.
58. Waterway, M. J. and J. R. Starr. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships in tribe Cariceae (Cyperaceae) based on nested analyses of four molecular data sets. Aliso 23: 165-192.
59. Waterway, M. J., T. Hoshino, and T. Masaki. 2009. Phylogeny, species richness, and ecological specialization in Cyperaceae tribe Cariceae. Botanical Review 75: 138-159.
60. Whittall, J. and S. A. Hodges. 2007. Pollinator shifts drive increasingly long nectar spurs in columbine flowers. Nature 447: 706-709.
61. Wilcox, T. P., D. J. Zwickl, T. A. Heath, and D. M. Hillis. 2002. Phylogenetic relationship of the dwarf boas and comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25: 361-371.
62. Worley, A. C., H. Ghazvini, and D. W. Schemske. 2009. A phylogeny of the genus Polemonium based on amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Systematic Botany 34: 149-161.
63. Yelton, S. and R. F. C. Naczi. 2001. Sectional circumscription and relationships of gynecandrous Carex subgenus Vignea (Cyperaceae) based on morphology. Abstract 602. Botany 2001 Abstracts, Botanical Society of America. (www.botany2001.org/section12/abstracts/209.shtml).
64. Yen, A. C. and R. G. Olmstead. 2000. Molecular systematics of Cyperaceae tribe Cariceae based on two chloroplast DNA regions: ndhF and trnL intron-intergenic spacer. Systematic Botany 25: 479-494.
65. Young, N. D. and J. Healy. 2003. GapCoder automates the use of indel characters in phylogenetic analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 4: 6, doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-4-6. www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/4/6.
66. [Zander, R. H. 2004. Minimal values for reliability of bootstrap and jackknife proportions, decay index and Bayesian posterior probability. Phyloinformatics 2: 1-13.