Measuring rates of phenotypic evolution and the inseparability of tempo and mode

Paleobiology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 351-373

  Hunt, Gene ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIVERGENCE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; PALEONTOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENETICS; RANDOM WALK METHOD; SAMPLING;

EID: 84868132581     PISSN: 00948373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1666/11047.1     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Ackerly, D. 2009. Conservatism and diversification of plant functional traits: Evolutionary rates versus phylogenetic sig-nal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106:19699-19706.
2. Alfaro, M. E., F. Santini, C. Brock, H. Alamillo, A. Dornburg, D. L. Rabosky, G. Carnevale, and L. J. Harmon. 2009. Nine exceptional radiations plus high turnover explain species diversity in jawed vertebrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106:13410-13414.
3. Alroy, J. 2008. Dynamics of origination and extinction in the marine fossil record. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:11536-11542.
4. -. 2010. Fair sampling of taxonomic richness and unbiased estimation of origination and extinction rates. Pp. 55-80 in Alroy and Hunt 2010.
5. Alroy, J., and G. Hunt, eds. 2010. Quantitative methods in paleobiology. Paleontological Society Papers 16. Paleontologi- cal Society, New Haven, Conn.
6. Arnold, S. J., M. E. Pfrender, and A. G. Jones. 2001. The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macro- evolution. Genetica 112-113:9-32.
7. Bookstein, F. L. 1987. Random walk and the existence of evolutionary rates. Paleobiology 13:446-464.
8. Brusatte, S. L., S. Montanari, H. Y. Yi, and M. A. Norell. 2011. Phylogenetic corrections for morphological disparity analysis: new methodology and case studies. Paleobiology 37:1-22.
9. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2010. Model selection and multimodel inference. Springer, New York.
10. Bush, A. 2000. Evolution within demes: stasis as a hierarchical phenomenon. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs 32:445.
11. Cheetham, A. H., J. B. C. Jackson, and L.-A. C. Hayek. 1993. Quantitative genetics of bryozoan phenotypic evolution. I. Rate tests for random change versus selection in differentiation of living species. Evolution47:1526-1538.
12. -. 1994. Quantitative genetics of bryozoan phenotypic evolution. II. Analysis of selection and random change in fossil species using reconstructed genetic parameters. Evolution 48:360-375.
13. Ciampaglio, C. N., M. Kemp, and D. W. McShea. 2001. Detecting changes in morphospace occupation patterns in the fossil record: characterization and analysis of measures of disparity. Paleobiology 27:695-715.
14. Clyde, W. C., and P. D. Gingerich. 1994. Rates of evolution in the dentition of early Eocene Cantius: comparison of size and shape. Paleobiology 20:506-522.
15. Eldredge, N., and S. J. Gould. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. Pp. 82-115 in T. J. M. Schopf, ed. Models in paleobiology. Freeman, Cooper, San Francisco.
16. Eldredge, N., J. N. Thompson, P. M. Brakefield, S. Gavrilets, D. Jablonski, J. B. C. Jackson, R. E. Lenski, B. S. Lieberman, M. A. McPeek, and W. I. Miller. 2005. The dynamics of evolutionary stasis. Paleobiology 31(Suppl. to No. 2):133-145.
17. Erwin, D. H., and R. L. Anstey. 1995. Speciation in the fossil record. Pp. 11-38 in D. H. Erwin and R. L. Anstey, eds. New approaches to speciation in the fossil record. Columbia University Press, New York.
18. Erwin, D. H., M. Laflamme, S. M. Tweedt, E. A. Sperling, D. Pisani, and K. J. Peterson. 2011. The Cambrian conundrum: early divergence and later ecological success in the early history of animals. Science 334:1091-1097.
19. Estes, S., and S. J. Arnold. 2007. Resolving the paradox of stasis: models with stabilizing selection explain evolutionary diver- gence on all timescales. American Naturalist 169:227-244.
20. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125:1-15.
21. Foote, M. 1991. Analysis ofmorphological data. Pp. 59-86 in N. L. Gilinsky and P. W. Signor, eds. Analytical paleobiology. Paleontological Society, Knoxville, Tennessee.
22. -. 2000. Origination and extinction components of taxo- nomic diversity: general problems. In D. H. Erwin and S. L. Wing, eds. Deep time: Paleobiology's perspective. Paleobiology 26(Suppl. to No. 4):74-102.
23. -. 2003. Origination and extinction through the Phanerozoic: a new approach. Journal of Geology 111:125-148.
24. Geary, D. H., G. Hunt, I. Magyar, and H. Schreiber. 2010. The paradox of gradualism: phyletic evolution in two lineages of lymnocardiid bivalves (Lake Pannon, central Europe). Paleobiology 36:592-614.
25. Gingerich, P. D. 1983. Rates of evolution: effects of time and temporal scaling. Science 222:159-161.
26. -. 1985. Species in the fossil record: concepts, trends, and transitions. Paleobiology 11:27-41.
27. -. 1993. Quantification and comparison of evolutionary rates. American Journal of Science 293-A:453-478.
28. -. 2001. Rates of evolution on the time scale of evolutionary process. Genetica 112-113:127-144.
29. -. 2009. Rates of evolution. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40:657-675.
30. Gould, S. J. 1984. Smooth curve of evolutionary rate: a psychological and mathematical artifact. Science 226:994-995.
31. -. 2002. The structure of evolutionary theory. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
32. Gould, S. J., and N. Eldredge. 1977. Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3:115-151.
33. Haldane, J. B. S. 1949. Suggestions as to the quantitative measurement of rates of evolution. Evolution 3:51-56.
34. Hannisdal, B. 2006. Phenotypic evolution in the fossil record: numerical experiments. Journal of Geology 114:133-153.
35. Hansen, T. F. 1997. Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51:1341-1351.
36. Harmon, L. J., J. Weir, C. Brock, R. Glor, W. Challenger, and G. Hunt. 2009. geiger: analysis of evolutionary diversification, R package, Version 1.3-1.
37. Harmon, L. J., J. B. Losos, T. J. Davies, R. G. Gillespie, J. L. Gittleman, W. B. Jennings, K. H. Kozak, M. A. McPeek, F. Moreno-Roark, T. J. Near, A. Purvis, R. E. Ricklefs, D. Schluter, J. A. Schulte, O. Seehausen, B. L. Sidlauskas, O. Torres-Carvajal, J. T. Weir, and A. O. Mooers. 2010. Early bursts of body size and shape evolution are rare in comparative data. Evolution 64:2385-2396.
38. Hendry, A. P., and M. T. Kinnison. 1999. The pace ofmodern life: measuring rates of contemporary microevolution. Evolution 53:1637-1653.
39. Hersch, E. I., and P. C. Phillips. 2004. Power and potential bias in field studies of natural selection. Evolution 58:479-485.
40. Hunt, G. 2006. Fitting and comparing models of phyletic evolution: random walks and beyond. Paleobiology 32:578- 601.
41. -. 2007. The relative importance of directional change, random walks, and stasis in the evolution of fossil lineages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104:18404-18408.
42. -. 2008a. Evolutionary patterns within fossil lineages: model-based assessment of modes, rates, punctuations and process. In P. H. Kelley and R. K. Bambach, eds. From evolution to geobiology: research questions driving paleontology at the start of a new century. Paleontological Society Papers 14:117- 131. Paleontological Society, Pittsburgh.
43. -. 2008b. Gradual or pulsed evolution: when should punctuational explanations be preferred? Paleobiology 34: 360-377.
44. -. 2011. paleoTS: Modeling evolution in paleontological time-series, R package, Version 0.4-1.
45. Hunt, G., and M. T. Carrano. 2010. Models and methods for analyzing phenotypic evolution in lineages and clades. Pp. 245- 269 in Alroy and Hunt 2010.
46. Jablonski, D., and D. J. Bottjer. 1990. Onshore-offshore trends in marine invertebrate evolution. Pp. 21-75 in W. D. Allmon and R. M. Ross, eds. Causes of evolution: a paleontological perspective. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
47. Kendall, M. G., and A. Stuart. 1969. The advanced theory of statistics, Vol. 1. Distribution theory. Hafner, New York.
48. Kingsolver, J. G., and D. W. Pfennig. 2007. Patterns and power of phenotypic selection in nature. BioScience 57:561-572.
49. Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gilbert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. American Naturalist 157:245-261.
50. Kinnison, M. T., and A. P. Hendry. 2001. The pace of modern life II: from rates of contemporary microevolution to pattern and process. Genetica 112-113:145-164.
51. Knapczyk, F. N., and J. K. Conner. 2007. Estimates of the average strength of natural selection are not inflated by sampling error or publication bias. American Naturalist 170:501-508.
52. Lande, R. 1976. Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30:314-334.
53. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
54. Liow, L. H., and J. D. Nichols. 2010. Estimating rates and probabilities of origination and extinctionusing taxonomic occurrence data: capture-mark-recapture (CMR) approaches. Pp. 81-94 in Alroy and Hunt 2010.
55. Lynch, M. 1990. The rate of morphological evolution in mammals from the standpoint of the neutral expectation. American Naturalist 136:727-741.
56. Marshall, C. R. 2006. Explaining the Cambrian ''explosion'' of animals. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 34:355-384.
57. Mousseau, T. A., and D. A. Roff. 1987. Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59:181-197.
58. Nee, S. 2004. Extinct meets extant: simple models in paleontology and molecular phylogenetics. Paleobiology 30:172-178.
59. O'Meara, B. C., C. C. Ané, M. J. Sanderson, and P. C. Wainwright. 2006. Testing for different rates of continuous trait evolution using likelihood. Evolution 60:922-933.
60. Pagel, M. 1998. Inferring evolutionary processes from phyloge- nies. Zoologica Scripta 26:331-348.
61. Polly, P. D. 2002. Phylogenetic tests for differences in shape and the importance of divergence times: Eldredge's enigma explored. Pp. 220-246 in N. MacLeod and P. L. Forey, eds. Morphology, shape and phylogeny. Taylor and Francis, London.
62. Rabosky, D. L. 2009. Heritability of extinction rates links diversification patterns in molecular phylogenies and fossils. Systematic Biology 58:629-640.
63. Roopnarine, P. D. 2003. Analysis of rates of morphologic evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 34:605-632.
64. Roy, K., and M. Foote. 1997. Morphological approaches to measuring biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:277-281.
65. Sheets, H. D., and C. E. Mitchell. 2001a. Uncorrelated change produces the apparent dependence of evolutionary rate on interval. Paleobiology 27:429-445.
66. -. 2001b. Why the null matters: statistical tests, random walks and evolution. Genetica 112-113:105-125.
67. Simpson, G. G. 1944. Tempo and mode in evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.
68. Smith, F. A., S. M. Elliott, and S. K. Lyons. 2010. Methane emissions from extinct megafauna. Nature Geoscience 3:374-375.
69. Stanley, S. M. 1985. Rates of evolution. Paleobiology 11:13-26.
70. Thomas, G. H., S. Meiri, and A. B. Phillimore. 2009. Body size diversification in Anolis: novel environment and island effects. Evolution 63:2017-2030.
71. Uyeda, J. C., T. F. Hansen, S. J. Arnold, and J. Pienaar. 2011. The million-year wait for macroevolutionary bursts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108:15908-15913.
72. Wang, S. C. 2010. Principles of statistical inference: likelihood and the Bayesian paradigm. Pp. 1-18 in Alroy and Hunt 2010.