MRI-guided targeted prostate biopsies in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: A systematic literature review;Biopsies prostatiques ciblées guidées par IRM dans le diagnostic du cancer de prostate : Revue de la littérature

Progres en Urologie

Volumn 22, Issue 15, 2012, Pages 903-912

  Fiard, G ^a   Descotes, J L ^a   Rambeaud, J J ^a   Hohn, N ^a   Troccaz, J ^b   Long, J A ^a  

^a GRENOBLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b LABORATOIRE TIMC IMAG   (France)

Author keywords

MRI; MRI TRUS fusion; Prostate biopsy; Targeted biopsy; TRUS

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR; SHORT SURVEY;

HUMANS; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84867990389     PISSN: 11667087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2012.06.005     Document Type: Short Survey

References (30)

1. Ouzzane A., Coloby P., Mignard J.P., Allegre J.P., Soulie M., Rebillard X., et al. Recommendations for best practice for prostate biopsy. Prog Urol 2011, 21:18-28.
2. Campos-Fernandes J.L., Bastien L., Nicolaiew N., Robert G., Terry S., Vacherot F., et al. Prostate cancer detection rate in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle biopsy. Eur Urol 2009, 55:600-606.
3. Pal R.P., Elmussareh M., Chanawani M., Khan M.A. The role of a standardized 36 core template-assisted transperineal prostate biopsy technique in patients with previously negative transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies. BJU Int 2012, 109:367-371.
4. Haffner J., Lemaitre L., Puech P., Haber G.P., Leroy X., Jones J.S., et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection. BJU Int 2011, 108:E171-E178.
5. Rouvière O., Papillard M., Girouin N., Boutier R., Rabilloud M., et al. Is it possible to model the risk of malignancy of focal abnormalities found at prostate multiparametric MRI?. Eur Radiol 2012, 22(5):1149-1157.
6. Lee SH, Chung MS, Chung BH. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy in men with previously negative prostate biopsies. J Endourol 2012. [Epub ahead of print].
7. D'Amico A.V., Tempany C.M., Cormack R., Hata N., Jinzaki M., Tuncali K., et al. Transperineal magnetic resonance image guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 2000, 164:385-387.
8. Zangos S., Eichler K., Engelmann K., Ahmed M., Dettmer S., Herzog C., et al. MR-guided transgluteal biopsies with an open low-field system in patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: technique and preliminary results. Eur Radiol 2005, 15:174-182.
9. Krieger A., Susil R.C., Ménard C., Coleman J.A., Fichtinger G., Atalar E., et al. Design of a novel MRI compatible manipulator for image guided prostate interventions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005, 52:306-313.
10. Beyersdorff D., Winkel A., Hamm B., Lenk S., Loening S.A., Taupitz M. MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5T: initial results. Radiology 2005, 234:576-581.
11. Anastasiadis A.G., Lichy M.P., Nagele U., Kuczyk M.A., Merseburger A.S., Hennenlotter J., et al. MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. Eur Urol 2006, 50:738-748. [discussion p. 748-9].
12. Engelhard K., Hollenbach H.P., Kiefer B., Winkel A., Goeb K., Engehausen D. Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5T scanner under real-time MR imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device. Eur Radiol 2006, 16:1237-1243.
13. Singh A.K., Krieger A., Lattouf J.-B., Guion P., Grubb R.L., Albert P.S., et al. Patient selection determines the prostate cancer yield of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-guided transrectal biopsies in a closed 3Tesla scanner. BJU Int 2008, 101:181-185.
14. Hambrock T., Somford D.M., Hoeks C., Bouwense S.A.W., Huisman H., Yakar D., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen. J Urol 2010, 183:520-527.
15. Pondman K.M., Fütterer J.J., ten Haken B., Schultze Kool L.J., Witjes J.A., Hambrock T., et al. MR-guided biopsy of the prostate: an overview of techniques and a systematic review. Eur Urol 2008, 54:517-527.
16. Yakar D., Schouten M.G., Bosboom D.G.H., Barentsz J.O., Scheenen T.W.J., Fütterer J.J. Feasibility of a pneumatically actuated MR-compatible robot for transrectal prostate biopsy guidance. Radiology 2011, 260:241-247.
17. Stoianovici D., Song D., Petrisor D., Ursu D., Mazilu D., Muntener M., et al. "MRI Stealth" robot for prostate interventions. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2007, 16:241-248.
18. Kaplan I., Oldenburg N.E., Meskell P., Blake M., Church P., Holupka E.J. Real-time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy. Magn Reson Imaging 2002, 20:295-299.
19. Singh A.K., Kruecker J., Xu S., Glossop N., Guion P., Ullman K., et al. Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy. BJU Int 2008, 101:841-845.
20. Xu S., Kruecker J., Turkbey B., Glossop N., Singh A.K., Choyke P., et al. Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies. Comput Aided Surg 2008, 13:255-264.
21. Miyagawa T., Ishikawa S., Kimura T., Suetomi T., Tsutsumi M., Irie T., et al. Real-time virtual sonography for navigation during targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging data. Int J Urol 2010, 17:855-860.
22. Pinto P.A., Chung P.H., Rastinehad A.R., Baccala A.A., Kruecker J., Benjamin C.J., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 2011, 186:1281-1285.
23. Hadaschik B.A., Kuru T.H., Tulea C., Rieker P., Popeneciu I.V., Simpfendörfer T., et al. A novel stereotactic prostate biopsy system integrating pre-interventional magnetic resonance imaging and live ultrasound fusion. J Urol 2011, 186:2214-2220.
24. Natarajan S., Marks L.S., Margolis D.J.A., Huang J., Macairan M.L., Lieu P., et al. Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system. Urol Oncol 2011, 29:334-342.
25. Ukimura O., Desai M.M., Palmer S., Valencerina S., Gross M., Abreu A.L., et al. 3-dimensional elastic registration system of prostate biopsy location by real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance with magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion. J Urol 2012, 187:1080-1086.
26. Hoeks C.M.A., Schouten M.G., Bomers J.G.R., Hoogendoorn S.P., Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C.A., Hambrock T., et al. Three Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers. Eur Urol 2012, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.047.
27. Long J.A., Hungr N., Baumann M., Descotes J.L., Bolla M., Giraud J.Y., et al. Development of a novel robot for transperineal needle-based interventions: focal therapy, brachytherapy and prostate biopsies. J Urol 2012, 10.1016/j.juro.2012.06.003.
28. Hungr N., Baumann M., Long J.A., Troccaz J. A 3D ultrasound robotic prostate brachytherapy system with prostate motiontracking. IEEE Trans Robot 2012, 10.1109/TRO.2012.2203051.
29. Barentsz J.O., Richenberg J., Clements R., Choyke P., Verma S., Villeirs G., et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 2012, 22:746-757.
30. Rastinehad A.R., Baccala A.A., Chung P.H., Proano J.M., Kruecker J., Xu S., et al. D'Amico risk stratification correlates with degree of suspicion of prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 2011, 185:815-820.