Recomplementation and locality of movement in Spanish

Probus

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 257-314

  Villa García, Julio ^a  

^a VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Complementizers; Left dislocation; Left periphery; Locality of movement; Recomplementation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867968827     PISSN: 09214771     EISSN: 16134079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/probus-2012-0011     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 1997. Clitic left dislocation and contrastive left dislocation. In Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & F. Zwarts (eds.), Materials on left dislocation, 151-192. Philadelphia, PA: E. John Benjamins.
2. Barbosa, Pilar. 2000. Clitics: a window into the null subject property. In João Costa (ed.), Portuguese syntax. New Comparative Studies, 31-94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Barbosa, Pilar. 2009. Two kinds of subject pro. Studia Linguistica 63. 2-58.
4. Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto. 2004. Topic, focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP ( The cartography of syntactic structures), 52-75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Boeckx, Cedric & Howard Lasnik. 2006. Intervention and repair. Linguistic Inquiry 37. 150-155.
6. Bokovic, Śeljko. 1994. D-structure, theta-criterion, and movement into theta-positions. Linguistic Analysis 24. 247-86.
7. Bokovic, Śeljko. 2002. On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 33. 351-383.
8. Bokovic, Śeljko. 2007. On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory. Linguistic Inquiry 38. 589-644.
9. Bokovic, Śeljko. 2008a. On the operator freezing effect. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26. 249-287.
10. Bokovic, Śeljko. 2008b. On successive cyclic movement and the freezing effect of feature checking. In Jutta Hartmann, Veronika Hegedüs, and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Sounds of silence: Empty elements in syntax and phonology, 195-233. Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland.
11. Bokovic, Śeljko. 2011. Rescue by PF deletion, traces as (non-)interveners, and the that-trace effect. Linguistic Inquiry 42. 1-44.
12. Bresnan, Joan W. 1977. Variables in the theory of transformations. In Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 157-196. New York, NY: Academic Press.
13. Brovetto, Claudia. 2002. Spanish clauses without complementizer. In Teresa Satterfield, Christina Tortora & Diana Cresti, Current issues in Romance languages: Selected Proceedings from the 29th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL-29), 33-46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Brucart, Josep M. 1993. Sobre la estructura de SCOMP en español [About the structure of CP in Spanish]. In Amadeu Viana (ed.), Sintaxi: teoria i perspectives, 59-102. Lleida: Pagès.
15. Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
16. Campos, Héctor. 1992. Los bearneses que quequean, ¿y nosotros qué? [Béarnese speakers use many ques, and what about us?]. Hispanic Linguistics 4(2). 329-349.
17. Campos, Héctor. 1997. On subject extraction and the anti-agreement effect in Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 28. 92-119.
18. Canac-Marquis, Réjean. 1991. On the Obligatory Character of Inversion in Spanish. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 10, 309-318.
19. Cardinaletti, Anna. 2004. Toward a cartography of subject positions. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 115-165. Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20. Casasanto, Laura S. & Ivan A. Sag. 2008. The advantage of the ungrammatical. In 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Cognitive Science Society, Austin, Texas.
21. Casielles, Eugenia. 2004. The syntax-information structure interface: Evidence from Spanish and English. New York, NY: Routledge.
22. Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 1-46.
23. Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar. In Paul Stanley Peters (ed.), Goals of linguistic theory, 63-130. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.
24. Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On Wh-Movement. In Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 71-132. New York, NY: Academic Press.
25. Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A'-dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Cocchi, Gloria & Cecilia Poletto. 2007. Complementizer deletion and double complementizers. In M. Cecilia Picchi & Alan Pona (eds.), 32nd Incontro di Gramatica Generativa, 49-62. Firenze: Edizioni dell'Orso.
29. Culicover, Peter W. 1992. The adverb effect: Evidence against ECP accounts of the that-t effect. In Amy J. Schafer (ed.), North East Linguistic Society 23, 97-111. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
30. Dagnac, Anne. 2011. Generalized C-doubling in an Oïl dialect, subjects and the nature of que2. Paper presented at the Edysin Workshop, University of Amsterdam, 25 June.
31. Demonte, Violeta & Olga Fernández-Soriano. 2007. La periferia izquierda oracional y los complementantes del español [The clausal left periphery and the complementizers of Spanish]. In Juan Cuartero & Martine Emsel (eds.), Vernetzungen: Kognition, Bedeutung, (kontrastive) Pragmatik, 133-147. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
32. Demonte, Violeta & Olga Fernández-Soriano. 2009. Force and finiteness in the Spanish complementizer system. Probus 21. 23-49.
33. Escribano, José Luis Rafael G. 1991. Una teoría de la oración [A theory of the sentence]. Oviedo: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.
34. Etxepare, Ricardo. 2010. From hearsay evidentiality to samesaying relations. Lingua 120. 604-627.
35. Fernández-Rubiera, Francisco José. 2009. Clitics at the edge: Clitic placement in Western Iberian Romance languages. Washington, DC: Georgetown University dissertation.
36. Fontana, Josep M. 1993. Phrase structure and the syntax of clitics in the history of Spanish. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.
37. Fox, Danny & Howard Lasnik. 2003. Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34. 143-154.
38. González i Planas, Francesc. 2011. La duplicació del complementador en les llengües iberoromániques [Complementizer doubling in Ibero-Romance languages]. Ms., Universitat de Girona.
39. Goodall, Grant. 1991. On the status of the Spec of IP. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 10, 175-182.
40. Gupton, Timothy. 2010. The syntax information structure interface: Subjects and clausal word order in Galician. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa dissertation.
41. Haegeman, Liliane. 2011. Main clause phenomena and the left periphery. Draft manuscript, University of Ghent (in press with Oxford University Press).
42. Higgins, Roger. 1988. Where the Old English sentence begins. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
43. Hornstein, Norbert, Howard Lasnik & Juan Uriagereka. 2003. The dynamics of islands: Speculations on the locality of movement. Linguistic Analysis 33. 149-175.
44. Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 69-96.
45. Iatridou, Sabine & Anthony Kroch. 1992. The licensing of CP-recursion and its relevance to the Germanic verb-second phenomenon. Working Papers in Scandinavian Linguistics 50. 1-25.
46. Kato, Mary. 1999. Strong pronouns and weak pronominals in the null subject parameter. Probus 11. 1-37.
47. Lasnik, Howard & Mamoru Saito. 1992. Move alpha: Conditions on its application and output. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
48. Lasnik, Howard. 2001. When can you save a structure by destroying it? In North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 31. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistic Student Association, 301-320.
49. Law, Paul. 1994. On the base position of wh-adjuncts and extraction. Paper presented at the 67th annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Los Angeles.
50. Ledgeway, Adam. 2005. Moving through the left periphery: the dual complementizer system in the dialects of Southern Italy. Philological Society 103. 229-396.
51. Lobeck, Anne. 1990. Functional heads as proper governors. In North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 31. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistic Student Association, 20, 348-362.
52. López, Luis. 1999. VP-ellipsis in English and Spanish and the features of auxiliaries. Probus 11. 263-297.
53. López, Luis. 2009a. A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. López, Luis. 2009b. Ranking the linear correspondence axiom. Linguistic Inquiry 40. 239-276.
55. Manzini, Rita & Leonardo Savoia. 2011. Grammatical categories -Variation in Romance languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Martín-González, Javier. 2002. The Syntax of sentential negation in Spanish. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University dissertation.
57. Mascarenhas, Salvador. 2007. Complementizer Doubling in European Portuguese. Ms., Amsterdam: ILLC/New York, NY: NYU.
58. McCloskey, James. 2006. Questions and questioning in a local English. In Raffaella Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger, and Paul H. Portner (eds.), Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture: Cross-linguistic Investigations, 86-126. Georgetown, DC: Georgetown University Press.
59. Merchant, Jason. 1999. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California, Santa Cruz dissertation.
60. Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Olarrea, Antxon. 1996. Pre and Postverbal Subjects in Spanish: A Minimalist Account. Seattle, WA: University of Washington dissertation.
62. Paoli, Sandra. 2003. COMP and the left periphery: Comparative evidence from Romance. Manchester: University of Manchester dissertation.
63. Paoli, Sandra. 2006. The fine structure of the left periphery: COMPs and subjects. Evidence from Romance. Lingua 117. 1057-1079.
64. Park, Bum-Sik. 2005. Focus, parallelism, and identity in ellipsis. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation.
65. Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and surface constraints in syntax. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
66. Pesetsky, David. 1992. Zero syntax (vol. 2). Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
67. Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The higher functional field: Evidence from Northern Italian dialects. New York: Oxford University Press.
68. Poole, Geoffrey. 2006. Interpolation and the left periphery in Old Spanish. In Newcastle and Durham Working Papers in Linguistics 12 and 13.
69. Radford, Andrew. 2011. Complementizer use in spoken English: Evidence from broadcast media. Ms., University of Essex.
70. Raposo, Eduardo. 1996. Towards a Unification of Topic Constructions. Ms., University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
71. Richards, Norvin. 1999. Complementizer cliticization in Tagalog and English. In Carolyn Smallwood & Catherine Kitto (eds.), Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 16.2: Proceedings of AFLA 6, 297-312. Toronto: Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics. Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
72. Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
73. Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
74. Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. On the position "Int(errogative)" in the left periphery of the clause. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 287-296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
75. Rizzi, Luigi. 2006. On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on, 97-133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76. Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, Miguel. 2007. The syntax of objects: Agree and Differential Object Marking. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation.
77. Rodríguez-Ramalle, Teresa. 2003. La gramática de los adverbios en -mente o cómo expresar maneras, opiniones y actitudes a través de la lengua. [The grammar of Spanish adverbs ending in -mente or how to express manners, opinions, and attitudes through language]. Madrid: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
78. Ron, María Pilar. 1998. The position of the subject in Spanish and clausal structure: Evidence from dialectal variation. Chicago/Evanston, IL: Northwestern University dissertation.
79. Ross, John Robert. 1969. Guess who? In Robert I. Binnick, Alice Davison, Georgia M. Green & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society 5, 252-286. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.
80. Saab, Andrés. 2010. Silent interactions: Spanish TP-ellipsis and the theory of island repair. Probus 22. 73-116.
81. Saito, Mamoru & Keiko Murasugi. 1990. N'-deletion in Japanese: A preliminary study. University of Connecticut Working Papers in Linguistics (UCWPiL) 3. 87-107.
82. Torrego, Esther. 1983. More Effects of Successive Cyclic Movement. Linguistic Inquiry 14. 561-565.
83. Torrego, Esther. 1984. On Inversion in Spanish and Some of Its Effects. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 103-129.
84. Uriagereka, Juan. 1988. On Government. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation.
85. Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. An F position in Western Romance. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), Discourse configurational languages, 153-175. Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
86. Villa-García, Julio. Forthcoming. On the Status of Preverbal Subjects in Spanish: Evidence for a Dedicated Subject Position. To appear in North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS) 42.
87. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
88. Villa-García, Julio. 2012a. The Spanish Complementizer System: Consequences for the Syntax of Dislocations and Subjects, Locality of Movement, and Clausal Structure. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation.
89. Villa-García, Julio. 2012b. Characterizing medial and low complementizers in Spanish: Recomplementation que and "jussive/ optative" que. In Melvin González-Rivera & Sandro Sessarego (eds.), Current Formal Aspects of Spanish Syntax and Semantics, 198-228. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
90. Villalba, Xavier. 2000. The syntax of sentence periphery. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Servei de Publicacions.
91. Wanner, Dieter. 1998. Les subordonnées à double complémentateur en roman medieval [Double complementizers in subordinate clauses in Medieval Romance]. In Ruffino Giovanni (ed.), Atti del XXI Congresso Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Romanza 1, 421-433. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
92. Zubizarreta, María Luisa. 1998. Word Order, Prosody and Focus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.