Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP-ellipsis

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 143-154

  Fox, Danny ^a   Lasnik, Howard ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14644429330     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/002438903763255959     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar. In Goals of linguistic theory, ed. by Paul Stanley Peters, 63-130. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
2. Chomsky, Noam. 1976. Conditions on rules of grammar. Linguistic Analysis 2:303-351.
3. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
4. Chung, Sandra, William Ladusaw, and James McCloskey. 1995. Sluicing and Logical Form. Natural Language Semantics 3:1-44.
5. Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
6. Fox, Danny. 1999. Focus, parallelism and accommodation. In Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory 9, ed. by Tanya Matthews and Devon Strolovitch, 70-90. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University, CLC Publications.
7. Fox, Danny. 2000. Economy and semantic interpretation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
8. Fox, Danny. 2002. Antecedent-contained deletion and the copy theory of movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33:63-96.
9. Fox, Danny. In preparation. Long distance QR and ACD. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
10. Kennedy, Christopher, and Jason Merchant. 2000. Attributive comparative deletion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18: 89-146.
11. Kratzer, Angelika. 1997. Scope or pseudoscope? Are there wide-scope indefinites? In Events and grammar, ed. by Susan Rothstein, 163-196. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
12. Krifka, Manfred. 1996. Frameworks for the representation of focus. In ESSLLI 96: Formal grammar, ed. by Geert-Jan M. Kruijff, Richard T. Oehrle, and Glyn Morrill. Universität des Saarlandes, Department of Computational Linguistics and Phonetics.
13. Lasnik, Howard. 2001. When can you save a structure by destroying it? In NELS 31, Vol. 2, ed. by Minjoo Kim and Uri Strauss, 301-320. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.
14. Lasnik, Howard, and Mamoru Saito. 1984. On the nature of proper government. Linguistic Inquiry 15:235-289. [Reprinted in Howard Lasnik, Essays on restrictiveness and learnability, 198-255. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1990.]
15. Legate, Julie. 1999. On the interpretation of indefinites. In NELS 29, ed. by Pius Tamanji, Masako Hirotani, and Nancy Hall, 247-260. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.
16. Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Merchant, Jason. In press. Variable island repair under ellipsis. In Topics in ellipsis, ed. by Kyle Johnson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Nissenbaum, Jon. 2000. Investigations of covert phrase movement. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
19. Reinhart, Tanya. 1997. Quantifier-scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 20:335-397.
20. Ross, John Robert. 1969. Guess who? In Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. by Robert I. Binnick, Alice Davison, Georgia M. Green, and Jerry L. Morgan, 252-286. Chicago: University of Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society.