Two kinds of subject pro

Studia Linguistica

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 2-58

  Do Pilar Pereira Barbosa, Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61849101718     PISSN: 00393193     EISSN: 14679582     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9582.2008.01153.x     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Alexiadou, A. Anagnostopoulou, E. 1998. Parameterizing AGR: Word Order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 491 539.
2. Alexiadou, A. Anagnostopoulou, E. 2001. The subject-in-situ generalization and the role of case in driving computations. Linguistic Inquiry 32, 193 231.
3. Ambar, M. 1992. Para uma sintaxe da inversão sujeito-verbo em Português. Lisboa : Colibri.
4. Ambar, M. 1998. Word order effects of a split CP hypothesis. Talk presented at the Workshop on Inversion in Romance, University of Amsterdam, May 1998.
5. Anagnostopoulou, E. 1997. Clitic left dislocation and contrastive left dislocation. Materials on Left Dislocation, eds. E. Anagnostopoulou, H. Van Riemsdujk F. Zwarts, 151 192. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
6. Baker, M. 2003. Agreement, dislocation and partial configurationality. Formal approaches to function grammar eds. A. Carnie, H. Harley M. Willie. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
7. Barbosa, P. 1995. Null subjects. MIT. Cambridge, Mass. Ph.D. diss.
8. Barbosa, P. 1996. Clitic placement in European Portuguese and the position of subjects. Approaching second: Second position clitics and related phenomena, eds. A. Halpern A. Zwicky, 1 40. Stanford, CA : CSLI Publications.
9. Barbosa, P. 2000. Clitics: a window into the null subject property. Portuguese syntax: Comparative studies, ed. J. Costa, 31 93. New York : Oxford University Press.
10. Barbosa, P. 2001. On inversion in wh-questions in Romance. Romance inversion, eds. A. Hulk J.-Y. Pollock, 20 90. New York : Oxford University Press.
11. Barbosa, P. 2002. O PPA e a propriedade do sujeito nulo. Volume de Homenagem a Henriqueta Costa Campos ed. C Nunes. Lisboa : Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
12. Barbosa, P., Duarte, M. E. Kato, M. 2005. Null Subjects in European and Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics. 4, 11 52. Lisboa : Edições Colibri.
13. Barnes, B. K. 1986. An empirical study of the syntax and pragmatics of LDs in spoken French. Studies in Romance Linguistics, eds. O. Jaeggli C. Silva-Corvalán. 207 224. Dordrecht : Foris.
14. Belletti, A. 1990. Generalized Verb Movement. Torino : Rosenberg & Sellier.
15. Britto, H. 1994. Reduzidas de gerúndio: teoria do caso e inversão verbo/sujeito. UNICAMP M.A. thesis.
16. Britto, H. 2000. Syntactic codification of categorical and thetic judgments in Brazilian Portuguese. Brazilian Portuguese and the Null Subject Parameter, eds. M. Kato E. Negrão, 195 221.
17. Brito, A. M. Duarte, I. 1983. Condições sobre posposição do sujeito em português. Boletim de Filologia 27, 191 254.
18. Burzio, L. 1986. Italian syntax: A Government-Binding approach. Dordrecht : Kluwer.
19. Calabrese, A. 1986. Pronomina: some properties of the Italian pronominal system. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8, 1 46.
20. Calabrese, A. 1990. Some remarks on focus and logical structures in Italian. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics. Cambridge : Harvard University.
21. Campos, H. 1997. On subject extraction and the antiagreement effect in Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 28, 92 119.
22. Cardinaletti, A. 1997. Subjects and clause structure. The new comparative syntax, ed. L. Haegeman. London : Longman.
23. Cardinaletti, A. 1998. A second thought on emarginazioni: destressing vs. 'right dislocation'. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 8.2., 1 28.
24. Cardinaletti, A. 2004. Towards a cartography of subject positions. The structure of IP and CP: The cartography of syntactic structure Volume 2, ed. L. Rizzi, 115 165. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
25. Cardinaletti, A. Starke, M. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. Clitics in the languages of Europe, ed. H van Riemsdijk, 145 235. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
26. Carlson, G. 1989. The semantic composition of English generic sentences. Properties, types and meaning, Vol. 2: Semantic issues, eds. G. Chierchia, B. Partee R. Turner, 167 191. Dordrecht : Kluwer.
27. Cechetto, C. 1999. A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance. Studia Linguistica 53, 40 67.
28. Cechetto, C. 2000. Doubling structures and reconstruction. Probus 12.1, 1 34.
29. Chomsky, N. 1977. On wh-movement. Formal Syntax, eds. P. Culicover, T. Wasow A. Akmajian, 71 132. NewYork : Academic Press.
30. Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht : Foris.
31. Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
32. Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, eds. R. Martin, D. Michaels J. Uriagereka, 89 156. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
33. Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. Ken Hale: A Life in Language, ed. M. Kenstowicz, 1 52. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
34. Chomsky, N. 2008. On Phases. Foundational issues in linguistic theory, eds. R. Freidin, C. P. Otero M.L. Zubizarreta, Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
35. Cinque, G. 1990. Types of A'-dependencies. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
36. Contreras, H. 1991. On the position of subjects. Syntax and Semantics 25, Academic Press.
37. Costa, J. 1998. Word order variation. A constraint-based approach. The Hague : Holland Academic Graphics.
38. Costa, J. 2001. Spec, IP ou deslocado? Prós e contras das duas análises dos sujeitos pré-verbais. DELTA 17. 1, 283 304.
39. Costa, J. Duarte, I. 2002. Preverbal subjects in null subject languages are not necessarily dislocated. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 2, 159 176.
40. Costa, J. Galves, C. 2002. Preverbal subjects in two varieties of Portuguese: evidence for a non-unified analysis. Romance languages and linguistic theory 2000, ed. C. Beyssade. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
41. Déchaîne, R. Wiltschko, M. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33 : 409 442.
42. Diesing, M. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
43. Demirdache, H. 1992. Resumptive chains in restrictive relative chains, appositives and dislocation structures, MIT : Ph.D. diss.
44. Dobrovie-Sorin, C. 1994. The syntax of Roumanian: Comparative studies in Romance. Foris: Dordrecht.
45. Duarte, I. 1983. Variação paramétrica e ordem dos clíticos. Revista da faculdade de letras de Lisboa 50, 158 178.
46. Duarte, I. 1987. A construção de topicalização na gramática do Português: regência, ligação e condições sobre movimento, University of Lisbon, Lisbon : PhD. diss.
47. Duarte, I. 1997. Ordem de palavras e estrutura discursiva. Sentido que a Vida Faz - Estudos para Óscar Lopes, eds. A. M. Brito, F. Oliveira, I. Pires de Lima R. M. Martelo. Porto : Campo das Letras.
48. Duarte, I. Matos, G. 2000. Romance clitics and the minimalist program. Portuguese syntax: new comparative studies, eds. J. Costa, 116 142. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
49. Duarte, M. E. L. 1993. Do pronome nulo ao pronome pleno: a trajetória do sujeito no português do Brasil. Português Brasileiro: Uma viagem diacrônica homenagem a Fernando Tarallo, eds. I. Roberts M. A. Kato, 107 128. Campinas : Editora da UNICAMP.
50. Duarte, M. E. L. 1995. A perda do princípio "Evite pronome" no Português Brasileiro. UNICAMP : Ph.D. diss.
51. th international congress of linguists. Paris : CD Syntax, 219.
52. Duarte, M. E. L. 2000. The loss of the 'Avoid Pronoun' principle in Brazilian Portuguese. The null subject parameter in Brazilian Portuguese, eds. M. Kato E. Negrão, 17 36. Frankfurt-Madrid : Vervuert-IberoAmericana.
53. Duranti, A. Ochs, E. 1979. Left-dislocation in Italian conversation. Syntax and Semantics 12, Discourse and Syntax, ed. T. Givón, 377 415. New York : Academic Press.
54. Ferreira, M. B. 2000. Argumentos nulos em Português Brasileiro. UNICAMP, Campinas, MA diss.
55. Figueiredo Silva, M. C. 1996. A posição sujeito no português brasileiro: frases finitas e infinitivas. Campinas : Ed. da UNICAMP.
56. Figueiredo-Silva, C. 2000. Main and embedded null subjects in Brazilian Portuguese. The null subject parameter in Brazilian Portuguese, eds. M. Kato E. Negrão, 127 146. Frankfurt : Vervuert-IberoAmericana.
57. Galves, C., Britto, H. Paixão De Sousa, M. C. 2006. The change in clitic placement from Classical to Modern European Portuguese: Results from the Tycho Brahe Corpus. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 4, 1. [Special Issue on variation and change in the Iberian languages: the Peninsula and beyondh].
58. Hernanz, M. L. 1991. Spanish absolute constructions and aspect. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics, 75 128. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
59. Holmberg, A. 2005. Is There a Little Pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 36, 533 564.
60. Iatridou, S. 1991. Clitics and island effects. MIT : Ms.
61. Jaeggli, O. 1984. Subject extraction and the null subject parameter. NELS 14, 132 153.
62. Kayne, R. 1975. French syntax: the transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
63. Kato, M. A. Raposo, E. 1996. European and Brazilian word order: questions, focus and topic constructions. Aspects of Romance Linguistics, eds. C. Parodi, A. C. Quicoli, M. Saltarelli M. L. Zubizarreta, 267 277. Washington : Georgetown U. Press.
64. Kato, M. A 1999. Strong pronouns, weak pronominals and the null subject parameter. Probus 11, 1 37.
65. Kato, M. A. 2000. The partial pro-drop nature and the restricted VS order in Brazilian Portuguese. The Null Subject Parameter in Brazilian Portuguese, eds. M. Kato E. Negrão, 223 258. Frankfurt : Vervuert-IberoAmericana.
66. Kato, M. A. Tarallo, F. 2003. The loss of VS syntax in Brazilian Portuguese. Dialogue between schools: sociolinguistics, conversational analysis and generative theory in Brazil, eds. B. Schliebe-Lange, I. Koch K. Jungbluth, 101 129. Münster : Nodus Publicationen, Klaus D. Ditz.
67. Kenstowicz, M. 1989. The Null Subject Parameter in Modern Arabic dialects. The Null Subject Parameter, eds. O. Jaeggli K. Safir, 263 276. Dordrecht : Kluwer.
68. Klima, E. 1964. Negation in English. The structure of language, eds. J. Katz J. Fodor, Prentice-Hall.
69. Landau, I. 2000. Elements of control: structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht : Kluwer.
70. Landau, I. 2003. Movement out of control. Linguistic Inquiry 34, 471 498.
71. Longobardi, G. 2000. 'Postverbal' subjects and the mapping hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 691 702.
72. Madeira, A. M. 1992. On clitic placement in European Portuguese. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 4, ed. H. van Koot, 95 122. London : University College.
73. Marantz, A. 1988. Clitics, morphological merger, and the mapping to Phonological Structure. Theoretical Morphology, eds. M. Hammond M. Noonan. Academic Press : New York.
74. Martins, A.M. 1994. Clíticos na história do Português. Universidade de Lisboa. Ph.D. diss.
75. Manzini, M.-R. Savoia, L. 2002. Parameters of subject inflection in Italian dialects. Subjects, expletives and the EPP, ed. P. Svenonius, 157 200. New York : Oxford University Press.
76. Modesto, M. 2000. Null subjects without "rich" agreement. The Null Subject Parameter in Brazilian Portuguese, eds. M. Kato E. Negrão, 147 174. Frankfurt : Vervuert-IberoAmericana.
77. Moro, A. 1997. The raising of predicates. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
78. Nespor, M. Vogel, I. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht : Foris.
79. Nunes, J. 1995. The copy theory of movement and linearization of chains in the Minimalist Program. University of Maryland, College Park : PhD Diss.
80. Nunes, J. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
81. Oliveira, M. de 2000. The pronominal subject in Italian and Brazilian Portuguese. The Null Subject Parameter in Brazilian Portuguese, eds. M. Kato E. Negrão, 37 54. Frankfurt : Vervuert-IberoAmericana.
82. Ordoñez, P. 1997. Word order and clause structure in Spanish and other Romance languages. CUNY Graduate Center. PhD diss.
83. Ordoñez, F. 1998. Post-verbal asymmetries in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 313 346.
84. Panagiotidis, P. Tsiplakou, S. 2006. An A-binding asymmetry in null subject languages and its significance for Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 37, 167 177.
85. Partee, B. 1995. Quantificational structures and compositionality. Quantification in Natural Languages, eds. E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer B. Partee, 541 602. Dordrecht : Kluwer.
86. Pesetsky, D. Torrego, E. 2004a. Tense, case, and the nature of syntactic categories. The Syntax of Time, eds. J. Gueron J. Lecarme. Cambridge MA : MIT Press.
87. Pesetsky, D. Torrego, E. 2004b. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. MIT and UMass/Boston : Ms.
88. Piera, C. 1987. Sobre la estructura de las cláusulas de infinitivo. Sintaxis de las lenguas románicas, eds. V. Demonte M. Lagunilla, 148 163. Madrid : Ediciones El Arquero.
89. Pinto, M. 1994. Subjects in Italian: distribution and interpretation. Linguistics in the Netherlands, eds. R. Bok-Bennema C. Cremers, 175 187. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
90. Platzack, C. 2004. Agreement and the person phrase hypothesis. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 73, 83 112. Lund University.
91. Poletto, C. 2000. The higher functional field in the Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
92. Pollock, J.-Y. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365 424.
93. Pollock, J.-Y. 1997. Langage et cognition: Introduction au programme minimaliste de la grammaire générative. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France.
94. Raposo, E. 1988. Romance inversion, the Minimality Condition and the ECP. Proceedings of NELS 18, Vol. 2., GLSA, Amherst, MA.
95. Raposo, E. 1994. Affective operators and clausal structure in European Portuguese and European Spanish. University of California at Santa Barbara, California : Ms.
96. Raposo, E. 1997. Definite/zero alternations in Portuguese: Towards a unified theory of topic constructions. Romance linguistics: Theoretical perspectives, eds. A. Schwegler, B Tranel M. Uribe-Etxebarria, 197 212. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
97. Raposo, E. P. 2000. Clitic positions and verb movement. Portuguese syntax: New comparative studies, ed. J. Costa, 266 297. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
98. Raposo, E. Uriagereka, J. 2005. Clitic placement in Western Iberian: A minimalist view. Handbook of Comparative Syntax, eds. G. Cinque R. Kayne, 639 697. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
99. Reinhart, T. 2006. Interface strategies. Optimal and costly computations. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
100. Renzi, L. 1988. ed Grande grammatica Italiana di consultazione I. Bologna : Il Mulino.
101. Rizzi, L. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht : Foris.
102. Rizzi, L. Roberts, I. 1989. Complex inversion in French. Probus 1, 1 30.
103. Rizzi, L. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. Elements of Grammar, ed. L. Haegeman. Dordrecht : Kluwer.
104. Roberts, I. 2006. Clitics, head movement and defective goals. University of Cambridge Ms.
105. Rodrigues, C. 2004. Impoverished morphology and A-movement out of case-domains. University of Maryland. Ph.D diss.
106. Rouveret, A. 1989. Cliticization et temps en Portugais Européen. Revue des Langues Romanes 93, 337 371.
107. Saccon, G. 1993. Post-verbal subjects: A study based on Italian and its dialects. Harvard University. Ph.D diss.
108. Samek-Lodovici, V. 1994. Structural focusing and subject inversion in Italian. Paper presented at Linguistics Symposium on Romance Languages XXIV, Los Angeles.
109. Sola, J. 1992. Agreement and subjects. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Ph.D. diss.
110. Suñer, M. 2002. The lexical preverbal subject in a romance null-subject language: Where art thou? A Romance Perspective on Language Knowledge and Use, eds. R. Nuñez-Cedeño, L. Lopez R. Cameron, Amsterdam : Benjamins.
111. Truckenbrodt, H. 1995. Phonological phrases: their relation to syntax, focus and prominence. MIT. Ph.D. diss.
112. Uriagereka, J. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26, 79 123.
113. Vallduví, A. 1992. A pre-verbal landing site for quantificational operators. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics, 319 344. Barcelona.
114. Vilkuna, M. 1995. Discourse configurationality in Finnish. Discourse configurational languages ed. K. É. Kiss, 244 268. New York : Oxford University Press.
115. Zubizarreta, M.-L. 1998. Word order, prosody and focus. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.