An illustrated framework for the analysis of Web2.0 interactivity

Contemporary Social Science

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 263-281

  Mechant, Peter ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867954530     PISSN: 21582041     EISSN: 2158205X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2012.716524     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Albrechtslund, A. (2008) Online social networking as participatory surveillance, First Monday. Available online at: http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2142/1949 (accessed 20 July 2012).
2. Alexander, B. 2006. Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning?. Educause Review, 41(2): 33-44.
3. Beer, D. 2009. Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media and Society, 11(6): 985-1002.
4. Berg, B. L. 2001. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, London: Allyn and Bacon.
5. Bordewijk, J. L. and van Kaam, B. 1986. Towards a new classification of teleinformation services. Inter Media, 14(1): 86-108.
6. Breslin, J. G., Passant, A. and Decker, S. 2009. The social semantic web, London: Springer.
7. Christodoulou, S. P. & Styliaras, G. D. (2008) Digital art 2.0: Art meets web 2.0 trend. Available online at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1413667 (accessed 20 July 2012).
8. Conole, G. and Alevizou, P. 2010. A literature review of the use of Web 2.0 tools in Higher Education, Milton Keynes: Higher Education Academy.
9. Cox, A. 2007. Flickr: What is new in Web2.0?. Aslib Proceedings, 60(5): 493-516.
10. Crawford, C. 2002. Understanding interactivity, San Francisco, CA: No Starch Press.
11. Curran, J., Fenton, N. and Freedman, D. 2012. Misunderstanding the internet, Abingdon: Routledge.
12. De Marez, L. & Schuurman, D. (2010) Digimeter Rapport 2 Vlaanderen Wave 2 November-Maart 2010. Available online at: http://digimeter.be/resultaten.php (accessed 20 July 2012).
13. De Marez, L. & Schuurman, D. (2011) Digimeter Rapport 3 Vlaanderen Wave 3 Augustus-November 2010. Available online at: http://digimeter.be/resultaten.php (accessed 20 July 2012).
14. Fontana, A. 2002. "Postmodern trends in interviewing". In Handbook of qualitative research: Context and method, Edited by: Gubrium, J. and Holstein, J. 161-175. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Fontana, A. and Frey, J. H. 2005. "The interview. From neutral stance to political involvement". In The Sage handbook of qualitative research, Edited by: Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. 695-727. London: Sage.
16. Golder, S. A. & Huberman, B. A. (2005) The structure of collaborative tagging systems (Ithaca, NY, Cornel University Library). Available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0508082 (accessed 20 July 2012).
17. Golder, S. A. and Huberman, A. 2006. Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2): 198-208.
18. Hammond, T., Hannay, T., Lund, B. & Scott, J. (2005) Social bookmarking tools: A general review, D-Lib Magazine. Available online at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april05/hammond/04hammond.html (accessed 20 July 2012).
19. Hoegg, R., Martignoni, R., Meckel, M. & Stanoevska-Slabeva, K. (2006) Overview of business models for web 2.0 communities. Available online at: http://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/Publikationen/31411 (accessed 20 July 2012).
20. Hoem, J. (2006) Openness in communication, First Monday. Available online at: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1367/1286 (accessed 20 July 2012).
21. Hogan, B. J. (2009) Networking in everyday life. Ph.D. University of Toronto. Available online at: http://individual.utoronto.ca/berniehogan/Hogan_NIEL_10-29-2008_FINAL.pdf6 (accessed 20 July 2012).
22. Hudson-Smith, A., Batty, M., Crooks, A. and Milton, R. 2009. Mapping for the masses: Accessing web 2.0 through crowdsourcing. Social Science Computer Review, 27(4): 524-538.
23. Hwang, W.-Y., Hsu, J.-L., Lee, A. T., Chou, H.-W. and Lee, C.-Y. 2009. Intra-action, interaction and outeraction in blended learning environments. Educational Technology and Society, 11(2): 222-239.
24. Jakobsson, P. & Stiernstedt, F. (2010) Pirates of Silicon Valley: State of exception and dispossession in web 2.0, First Monday. Available online at: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2799/2577 (accessed 20 July 2012).
25. Jaokar, A. (2006) Tim O'Reilly's seven principles of web 2.0 make a lot more sense if you change the order, Open Gardens. Available online at: http://opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2006/04/a_web_20_faq.html (accessed 20 July 2012).
26. Jarrett, K. (2008) Interactivity is Evil! A critical investigation of Web 2.0, First Monday. Available online at: http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2140/1947 (accessed 20 July 2012).
27. Jensen, J. F. 1999. "Interactivity: Tracking a new concept in media and communication studies". In Computer media and communication, Edited by: Meyer, P. A. 160-187. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Jensen, J. F. and Toscan, C. 1999. Interactive television: TV of the future or future of the TV?, Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
29. Kiousis, S. 2002. Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media and Society, 4(3): 355-383.
30. Laurent, O. (2009) Getty images targets Flickrverse, British Journal of Photography. Available online at: http://www.bjp-online.com/british-journal-of-photography/news/1647691/getty-images-targets-flickrverse (accessed 20 July 2012).
31. Leiner, D. J. and Quiring, O. 2008. What interactivity means to the user. Essential insights into and a scale for perceived interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1): 127-155.
32. Lewins, A. and Silver, C. 2007. Using software in qualitative research, London: Sage.
33. Lilleker, D. G. and Malagon, C. 2010. Levels of interactivity in the 2007 French presidential candidates' websites. European Journal of Communication, 25(1): 25-42.
34. Maness, J. M. (2006) Library 2.0 theory: Web 2.0 and its implications for libraries, Webology. Available online at: http://www.webology.org/2006/v3n2/a25.html (accessed 20 July 2012).
35. Marshall, M. N. 1996. Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6): 522-525.
36. McMillan, S. J. 2002. "Exploring models of interactivity form multiple research traditions". In The handbook of new media, Edited by: Lievrouw, L. and Livingstone, S. 163-175. London: Sage.
37. McMillan, S. J. and Downes, E. 2000. Defining interactivity: A qualitative identification of key dimensions. New Media and Society, 2(2): 157-179.
38. Miles, M. and Huberman, A. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, London: Sage.
39. Miller, P. (2005) Web 2.0: Building the new library, Ariadne. Available online at: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue45/miller/ (accessed 20 July 2012).
40. Morse, J. 1998. "Designing funded qualitative research". In Strategies of qualitative enquiry, Edited by: Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. 56-85. London: Sage.
41. Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S. & Bradner, E. (2000) Interaction and outeraction: Instant messaging in action. Available online at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=358975&bnc=1 (accessed 20 July 2012).
42. Newhagen, J. E. 2004. Interactivity, dynamic symbol processing, and the emergence of content in human communication. The Information Society, 20(5): 397-402.
43. Norman, D. 2002. The design of everyday things, New York: Basic Books.
44. Oldenburg, R. 1999. The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons and other hangouts at the heart of a community, New York: Marlowe and Company.
45. Oldenburg, R. and Brissett, D. 1982. The third place. Qualitative Sociology, 5(4): 265-284.
46. O'Reilly, T. (2003) The architecture of participation, O'Reilly Developer Weblogs. Available online at: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/3017 (accessed 20 July 2012).
47. O'Reilly, T. (2005) What is Web2.0-design patterns and business models for the next generation of software, O'Reilly Radar. Available online at: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html (accessed 20 July 2012).
48. Papacharissi, Z. 2008. "The virtual sphere 2.0". In Routledge handbook of internet politics, Edited by: Chadwick, A. and Howard, P. N. 230-245. Abingdon: Routledge.
49. Patmore, C., Qureshi, H. and Nicholas, E. 2001. Consulting older community care clients about their services: Some lessons for researchers and service managers. Research Policy and Planning, 18(1): 4-11.
50. Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Petersen, S. M. (2008) Loser generated content: From participation to exploitation, First Monday. Available online at: http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2141/1948 (accessed 20 July 2012).
52. Pissard, N. & Prieur, C. (2007) Thematic vs. social networks in web 2.0 communities: A case study on Flickr groups. Available online at: http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/17/69/54/PDF/42-algotel-flickr.pdf (accessed 20 July 2012).
53. Prieur, C., Cardon, D., Beuscart, J.-S., Pissard, N. & Pons, P. (2008) The strength of weak cooperation. Available online at: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0802/0802.2317.pdf (accessed 20 July 2012).
54. Quiring, O. 2009. What do users associate with 'interactivity'? A qualitative study on user schemata. New Media and Society, 11(6): 899-920.
55. Rafaeli, S. 1988. "Interactivity: From new media to communication". In Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal process, Edited by: Hawkins, R. P., Wiemann, J. M. and Pingree, S. 110-134. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
56. Reid, F. and Reid, D. 2010. The expressive and conversational affordances of mobile messaging. Behaviour and Information Technology, 29(1): 3-22.
57. Rigby, B. 2008. Mobilizing generation 2.0: A practical guide to using Web 2.0 technologies to recruit, organize, and engage youth, San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons.
58. Rosadiuk, A. (2008) About the design and deviantART, Synoptique. Available online at: http://www.synoptique.ca/core/articles/s11_about_the_design/ (accessed 20 July 2012).
59. Scholz, T. (2008) Market ideology and the myths of web 2.0, First Monday. Available online at: http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2138/1945 (accessed 20 July 2012).
60. Sotira, D. (2010) Deviantart's tenth birthday. Available online at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9O2lRAooUWk (accessed 20 July 2012).
61. Soukup, C. 2006. Computer-mediated communication as a virtual third place: Building Oldenburg's great good places on the world wide web. New Media and Society, 8(3): 421-440.
62. Stern, A. and Wakabayashi, C. 2007. Are you ready for web2.0 marketing?. J@pan Inc., 72: 6-9.
63. Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. M. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64. Szuprowicz, B. 1995. Multimedia networking, New York: McGraw-Hill.
65. Tremayne, M. 2008. Manipulating interactivity with thematically hyperlinked news texts: A media learning experiment. New Media and Society, 10(5): 703-727.
66. Valafar, M., Rejaie, R. & Willinger, W. (2009) Beyond friendship graphs: A study of user interactions in Flickr. Available online at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1592672 (accessed 20 July 2012).
67. Zimmer, M. (2008) The externalities of search 2.0: The emerging privacy threats when the drive for the perfect search engine meets web 2.0, First Monday. Available online at: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2136/1944 (accessed 20 July 2012).