Rotterdam open data: Exploring the release of Public Sector Information through co-creation

2012 18th International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE 2012 - Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Conradie, Peter ^a   Mulder, Ingrid ^b   Choenni, Sunil ^c  

^a ROTTERDAM UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c Ministerie van Justitie   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Co creation; co innovation; open innovation; public services

Indexed keywords

CO-CREATION; CO-INNOVATION; CREATIVE INDUSTRIES; IDEA EXCHANGE; ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLES; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; OPEN INNOVATION; PILOT STUDIES; PUBLIC SECTOR; PUBLIC SECTOR INFORMATION; PUBLIC SERVICES; ROTTERDAM; SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE;

ENGINEERING; INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING;

INNOVATION;

EID: 84867919321     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICE.2012.6297651     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Anthopoulos, L.G., Siozos, P. & Tsoukalas, I.A. (2007) Applying participatory design and collaboration in digital public services for discovering and re-designing e-Government services. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), p.353-376.
2. Battarbee, K., Baerten, N., Hinfelaar, M., Irvine, P., Loeber, S., Munro, A., & Pederson, T. (2002). Pools and Satellites - Intimacy in the City. Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, pp. 237-245.
3. Bessant, Enabling continuous and discontinuous innovation: learning from the private sector. (2005). Public Money Managagement. 25, pp 35-42.
4. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating And Profiting from Technology (p. 272). Harvard Business Review Press.
5. Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In Chesbrough, H. W., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Conradie, P., Choenni, S., (2012), submitted for review.
7. Dekkers, M., Polman, F., Velde, R. te, & Vries, M. de. (2006). Mepsir: Measuring European Public Sector Information Resources.
8. European Commission (2003) "Communication of the Re-use of Public Sector Information - Review of Directive 2003/98/EC"
9. Gassmann, O. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. R&D Management, 36(3), pp. 223-228.
10. Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), pp. 213-221.
11. Hartman, A., Jain, A. N., Ramanathan, J., Ramfos, A., Van der Heuvel, W.-J., Zirpins, C., Tai, S., et al. (2010). Participatory design of public sector services. EGOVIS10 Proceedings of the First international conference on Electronic government and the information systems perspective, pp. 219-233..
12. Huijboom, N., & Broek, T. V. D. (2011). Open data: an international comparison of strategies. European Journal of ePractice, 12(April), 1-13.
13. Kouprie, M. & Sleeswijk Visser, F. (2009) A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user's life. Journal of Engineering Design, 20(5), pp.437-448.
14. Louwes. (2011). Rotterdam open datalab van start met 36 Rotterdamapps in wording. Accessed 26 October, 2011.
15. Mulder, I. & Stappers, P.J. (2009). Co-creating in practice: results and challenges. In: K.D. Thoben, K.S. Pawar, B. Katzy, & R. Bierwolf (eds.). Collaborative Innovation: Emerging Technologies, Environments and Communities (Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: ICE 2009, Leiden, The Netherlands, 22-24 June 2009). Centre for Concurrent Enterprise: Nottingham, UK.
16. Niitamo, V. P., Kulkki, S., Eriksson, M., & Hribernik, K. A. (2006). State-of-the-art and good practice in the field of living labs. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: Innovative Products and Services through Collaborative Networks. Italy: Milan, pp. 26-28.
17. Obama, B. (2009). Transparency and Open Government | The White House. Retrieved April 10, 2012, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/ Transparency-and-Open-Government
18. Rising, L. & Janoff, N.S. (2000). The Scrum software development process for small teams. Software, IEEE, 17(4), pp.26-32.
19. Sanders, E., B.N. and P. J. Stappers (2008) "Co-creation and the new landscapes of design." Co-Design 4(1), pp.5-18.
20. Schuler, D. and A. Namioka (1993) Participatory design: principles and practices. Routledge, p. 319.
21. van de Vrande, V., de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & de Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6-7), pp. 423-437.
22. Weiss, P. (2002). Borders in Cyberspace: Conflicting Public Sector Information Policies and their Economic Impacts. Federal Register. Edward Elger Publishing.
23. West, D. (2009). Comparing technology innovation in the private and public sectors. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 1-23.
24. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Meijer, R., Choenni, R., Charalabidis, Y. and Jeffery, K. Issues and guidance for opening governmental judicial research data. In press.