How Does the Difference Between Users' Expectations and Perceptions About a Robotic Agent Affect Their Behavior?: An Adaptation Gap Concept for Determining Whether Interactions Between Users and Agents Are Going Well or Not

International Journal of Social Robotics

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 109-116

  Komatsu, Takanori ^a   Kurosawa, Rie ^a   Yamada, Seiji ^b  

^a SHINSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Adaptation gap; User behavior toward agents; User expectations and perceptions

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; ROBOTICS; SOCIAL ROBOTS;

ACCEPTANCE RATE; ADAPTATION GAP; ROBOTIC AGENTS; USER BEHAVIORS; USER EXPECTATIONS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84867915495     PISSN: 18754791     EISSN: 18754805     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12369-011-0122-y     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Imai M, Ono T, Ishiguro H Robovie: communication technologies for a social robot. Int J Artif Life Robot 73-77 (2003).
2. Watanabe T, Okubo M, Nakashige M, Danbara R (2004) InterActor: speech-driven embodied interactive actor. Int J Hum-Comput Interact 17: 43-60.
3. Prendinger H, Ishizuka M (2004) Life-like characters. Springer, Berlin.
4. Cassell J, Stocky T, Bickmore T, Gao Y, Nakano Y, Ryokai K, Tversky D, Vaucelle C, Vilhjalmsson H (2002) MACK: Media lab autonomous conversational kiosk. In: Proceedings of Imagina02.
5. Komatsu T, Yamada S (2007) How do robotics agents' appearances affect people's interpretations of the agents' attitudes. In: Extended Abstract of ACM-CHI2007, pp 2519-2525.
6. Komatsu T, Yamada S (2011) How does the agents' appearance affect users' interpretation of the agents' attitudes-experimental investigation on expressing the same artificial sounds from agents with different appearances. Int J Hum-Comput Interact 27(33): 260-279.
7. Lee N, Shin H, Sundar SS (2011) Utilitarian vs hedonic robots: role of parasocial tendency and anthropomorphism in shaping user attitude. In: Proceedings of the 6th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 183-184.
8. Scholtz J, Bahrami S (2003) Human-robot interaction: development of an evaluation methodology for the bystander role of interaction. In: Proceedings of 2003 IEEE international conference on systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol 4, pp 3212-3217.
9. Goetz J, Kiesler S, Powers A (2003) Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: Proceedings of the 12 the IEEE international workshops on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN2003, pp 55-60.
10. Matsumoto N, Fujii H, Goan M, Okada M (2005) Minimal design strategy for embodied communication agents. In: Proceedings of the 14th international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN2005, pp 335-340.
11. Okada M, Sakamoto S, Muu N Suzuki (2000) Artificial creatures as an embodied interface. In: Proceedings of 27th international conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques, SIGGRAPH, p 91.
12. Suzuki N, Takeuchi Y, Ishii K, Okada M (2000) Talking: eye: autonomous creatures for augmented chatting. Robot Auton Syst 31: 171-184.
13. Kiesler S (2005) Fostering common ground in human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 14th international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN2005, pp 729-734.
14. Clark HH (1992) Arenas of language use. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
15. Kanda T, Miyashita T, Osada T, Haikawa Y, Ishiguro H (2008) Analysis of humanoid appearances in human-robot interaction. IEEE Trans Robot 24(3): 725-735.
16. Yamada S, Komatsu T (2006) Designing simple and effective expressions of robot' primitive minds to a human. In: Proceedings of 2006 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, IROS-2006, pp 2614-2619.
17. Komatsu T, Yamada S (2008) Effect of agent appearance on people's interpretation of agent's attitudes. In: Extended abstract of ACM-CHI-2008, pp 2929-2934.
18. Komatsu T, Yamada S (2011) Adaptation gap hypothesis: how differences between users' expected and perceived agent functions affect their subjective impressions. J Syst Cybern Inform 9(1): 67-74.
19. Koehler DJ (1990) Hypothesis generation and confidence in judgment. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 20: 461-469.
20. Kiyokawa S, Ueda K, Okada T (2003) The effect of meta-cognitive suggestions on viewpoint change in collaborative problem solving. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on cognitive science and the annual meetings of the 7th Australian cognitive science society joint conference, CD-ROM.
21. Michelle WM, Larry RD (1995) A study of technological sophistication and technophobia in university students from 23 countries. Comput Hum Behav 11(1): 95-133.