Proactive spoken dialogue interaction in multi-party environments

Proactive Spoken Dialogue Interaction in Multi-Party Environments

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-175

  Strauß, Petra Maria ^a   Minker, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867884821     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5992-8     Document Type: Book

References (121)

1. Adair, 1984] Adair, G. (1984). The Hawthorne Effect: A Reconsideration of the Methodological Artifact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2):334-345.
2. Alexandersson et al., 1998] Alexandersson, J., Buschbeck-Wolf, B., Fujinami, T., Kipp, M., Koch, S., Melanie Maier, E., Reithinger, N., Schmitz, B., and Siegel, M. (1998). Dialogue acts in verbmobil-2 second edition. Technical Report 226, DFKI Saarbrücken, Germany.
3. Alexandersson et al., 1995] Alexandersson, J., Maier, E., and Reithinger, N. (1995). A robust and efficient three-layered dialogue component for a speech-Tospeech translation system. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL (EACL), pages 188-193, Dublin, Ireland.
4. Allen, 1995] Allen, J. (1995). Natural language understanding. Benjamin- Cummings, Redwood City, CA, USA, 2nd edition.
5. Austin, 1962] Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.
6. Bach and Harnish, 1979] Bach, K. and Harnish, R. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
7. Baker et al., 1998] Baker, C. F., Fillmore, C. J., and Lowe, J. B. (1998). The Berkeley FrameNet project. In Boitet, C. and Whitelock, P., editors, Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 86-90, San Francisco, CA, USA. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
8. Barthelmess and Ellis, 2005] Barthelmess, P. and Ellis, C. (2005). The Neem Platform: An Evolvable Framework for Perceptual Collaborative Applications. Intelligent Information Systems, 25(2):207-240.
9. Baum, 1900] Baum, L. F. (1900). The wonderful Wizard of Oz. George M. Hill, Chicago, IL, USA.
10. Berger et al., 1980] Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., and Zelditch, Jr., M. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6:479-508.
11. Beywl et al., 2007] Beywl, W., Kehr, J., Mäder, S., and Niestroj, M. (2007). Evaluation Schritt für Schritt: Planung von Evaluationen, volume 20(26). Heidelberger Institut Beruf und Arbeit (hiba), Heidelberg, Germany.
12. Bolton, 1979] Bolton, R. (1979). People Skills: How to Assert Yourself, Listen to Others, and Resolve Conicts. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY, USA.
13. Bortz and Döring, 2006] Bortz, J. and Döring, N. (2006). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation: für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 4th edition.
14. Branigan, 2006] Branigan, H. (2006). Perspectives on multi-party dialogue. Research on Language and Computation, 1:1-25.
15. Bunt, 1999] Bunt, H. (1999). Context representation for dialogue management. In Proceedings of the 2nd International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context (CONTEXT), volume 1688 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 77-90. Springer.
16. Bunt, 2000] Bunt, H. (2000). Dialogue pragmatics and context specification. In Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue; Studies in Computational Pragmatics, pages 81-150. John Benjamins.
17. Bunt, 1994] Bunt, H. C. (1994). Context and dialogue control. THINK Quarterly, 3:19-31.
18. Burchardt et al., 2006] Burchardt, A., Erk, K., Frank, A., Kowalski, A., Pado, S., and Pinkal, M. (2006). SALTO - A Versatile Multi-Level Annotation Tool. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Genoa, Italy.
19. Burger et al., 2002] Burger, S., MacLaren, V., and Yu, H. (2002). The ISL Meeting Corpus: The Impact Of Meeting Type on Speech Type. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), Denver, CO, USA.
20. Burger and Sloane, 2004] Burger, S. and Sloane, Z. (2004). The ISL meeting corpus: Categorical features of communicative groups interactions. In Proceedings of the NIST ICASSP Meeting Recognition Workshop, Montreal, Canada.
21. Burkhardt et al., 2005] Burkhardt, F., Paeschke, A., Rolfes, M., Sendlmeier, W., and Weiss, B. (2005). A Database of German Emotional Speech. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (INTERSPEECH), .
22. Campbell, 2008] Campbell, N. (2008). Tools and resources for visualising conversational-speech interaction. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Marrakech, Morocco.
23. Carberry et al., 1999] Carberry, S., Chu-Carroll, J., and Elzer, S. (1999). Constructing and utilizing a model of user preferences in collaborative consultation dialogues. Computational Intelligence, 15:185-217.
24. Carletta et al., 2002] Carletta, J., Anderson, A. H., and Garrod, S. (2002). Seeing eye to eye: An account of grounding and understanding in work groups. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 9(1):1-20.
25. Carletta et al., 2005] Carletta, J., Ashby, S., Bourban, S., Flynn, M., Guillemot, M., Hain, T., Kadlec, J., Karaiskos, V., Kraaij, W., Kronenthal, M., Lathoud, G., Lincoln, M., Lisowska, A., McCowan, I., Post, W., Reidsma, D., and Wellner, P. (2005). The AMI meetings corpus. In Proceedings of the Measuring Behavior 2005 Symposium on Annotating and Measuring Meeting Behavior.
26. Carlson et al., 1995] Carlson, R., Hunnicutt, S., and Gustafsson, J. (1995). Dialog management in the Waxholm system. In Proceedings of the 8th Swedish Phonetics Conference, Working Papers 43, pages 137-140, Lund, Sweden.
27. Chen et al., 2005] Chen, L., Rose, R. T., Qiao, Y., Kimbara, I., Parrill, F., Welji, H., Han, X., Tu, J., Huang, Z., Harper, M., Queck, F., Xiong, Y., McNeill, D., Tuttle, R., and Huang, T. (2005). VACE multimodal meeting corpus. In Proceedings of the 2nd Joint Workshop on Multimodal Interaction and Related Machine Learning Algorithms (MLMI), Edinburgh, UK.
28. Chu-Carroll, 1999] Chu-Carroll, J. (1999). Form-based reasoning for mixedinitiative dialogue management in information-query systems. In Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH), pages 1519-1522, Budapest, Hungary.
29. Clark, 1996] Clark, H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.
30. Clark and Carlson, 1982] Clark, H. and Carlson, T. (1982). Hearers and Speech Acts. Language, 58(2):332-373.
31. Clark and Schaefer, 1987] Clark, H. and Schaefer, E. (1987). Concealing one's meaning from overhearers. Journal of Memory and Language, 26:209-225.
32. Clark and Schaefer, 1989] Clark, H. and Schaefer, E. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13:259-294.
33. Clark and Schober, 1989] Clark, H. and Schober, M. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21:211-232.
34. Cooper and Larsson, 1998] Cooper, R. and Larsson, S. (1998). Dialogue moves and information states. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS), Tilburg, The Netherlands.
35. Core and Allen, 1997] Core, M. G. and Allen, J. F. (1997). Coding Dialogs with the DAMSL Annotation Scheme. In AAAI Fall Symposium on Communicative Action in Humans and Machines, Cambridge, MA, USA.
36. Cusano et al., 2004] Cusano, C., Ciocca, G., and Schettini, R. (2004). Image annotation using SVM. In Internet Imaging IV, volume SPIE.
37. Dahlbäck et al., 1993] Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., and Ahrenberg, L. (1993). Wizard of Oz studies - Why and how. In Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), pages 193-200, Orlando, FL, USA.
38. Danninger et al., 2005] Danninger, M., Flaherty, G., Bernardin, K., Ekenel, H. K., Kohler, T., Malkin, R., Stiefelhagen, R., and Waibel, A. (2005). The Connector: Facilitating context-Aware communication. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Multimodal interfaces (ICMI), pages 69-75, New York, NY, USA. ACM Press.
39. Diekmann, 2007] Diekmann, A. (2007). Empirische Sozialforschung. Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen. Rowohlt Taschenbuchverlag, Reinbeck bei Hamburg, Germany, 18th edition.
40. Doran et al., 2001] Doran, C., Aberdeen, J., Damianos, L., and Hirschman, L. (2001). Comparing Several Aspects of Human-Computer and Human-Human Dialogues. In von Kuppevelt, J. and Smith, R., editors, Proceedings of the 2nd SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Aalborg, Denmark.
41. Dudda, 2001] Dudda, C. (2001). Evaluierung eines natürlichen Dialogsystems für Restaurantauskünfte. PhD thesis, Institution für Kommunikationsakustik, Ruhr-Universität, Bochum, Germany.
42. Dutoit, 2001] Dutoit, T. (2001). An Introduction to Text-To-Speech Synthesis. Kluwer, Norwell, MA, USA.
43. Erk and Pado, 2006] Erk, K. and Pado, S. (2006). Shalmaneser - A exible toolbox for semantic role assignment. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Genoa, Italy.
44. Feuerberg et al., 2005] Feuerberg, B.ahner, J. E., and Manzey, D. (2005). Interindividuelle Unterschiede im Umgang mit Automation - Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung des Complacency-Potentials, pages 199-202. Fortschrittberichte VDI, Nr. 22, Düsseldorf, Germany.
45. Garofolo et al., 2004] Garofolo, J., Laprun, C., Michel, M., Stanford, V., and Tabassi, E. (2004). The NIST meeting room pilot corpus. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), .
46. Ginzburg, 1996] Ginzburg, J. (1996). The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, chapter Interrogatives: Questions, facts and dialogue, pages 385-422. Blackwell Publisher Oxford.
47. Ginzburg and Fernàndez, 2005] Ginzburg, J. and Fernàndez, R. (2005). Action at a distance: The di-erence between dialogue and multilogue. In Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (DIALOR), Nancy, France.
48. Goffman, 1981] Goffman, E. (1981). Footing. University of Pennsylvania Press.
49. Grice, 1968] Grice, H. (1968). Utterer's meaning, sentence meaning, and wordmeaning. Foundations of Language, 4:225-242.
50. Grosz, 1977] Grosz, B. J. (1977). The representation and use of focus in dialogue understanding. In Grosz, B. J., Jones, K. S., and Webber, B. L., editors, Readings in Natural Language Processing. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
51. Guindon et al., 1987] Guindon, R., Shuldberg, K., and Conner, J. (1987). Grammatical and ungrammatical structures in user-Adviser dialogues: Evidence for sufficiency of restricted languages in natural language interfaces to advisory systems. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 41-44, Stanford, CA, USA.
52. Hassenzahl et al., 2003] Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., and Koller, F. (2003). AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. Mensch & Computer 2003. Interaktion in Bewegung, pages 187-196.
53. Hone and Graham, 2000] Hone, K. S. and Graham, R. (2000). Towards a tool for the Subjective Assessment of Speech System Interfaces (SASSI). Natural Language Engineering, 6(3-4):287-303.
54. Huang et al., 2001] Huang, X., Acero, A., and Hon, H.-W. (2001). Spoken Language Processing: A Guide to Theory, Algorithm, and System Development. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
55. Janin et al., 2003] Janin, A., Baron, D., Edwards, J., Ellis, D., Gelbart, D., Morgan, N., Peskin, B., Pfau, T., Shriberg, E., Stolcke, A., and Wooters, C. (2003). The ICSI meeting corpus. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 364-367, Hong Kong.
56. Jelinek, 1997] Jelinek, F. (1997). Statistical methods for speech recognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
57. Jeon and Manmatha, 2004] Jeon, J. and Manmatha, R. (2004). Using maximum entropy for automatic image annotation. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval (CIVR), pages 24-32, Dublin, Ireland.
58. Jönsson, 1997] Jönsson, A. (1997). A model for habitable and efficient dialogue management for natural language interaction. Natural Language Engineering, 3(2):103-122.
59. Jönsson and Dahlbäck, 1988] Jönsson, A. and Dahlbäck, N. (1988). Talking to a computer is not like talking to your best friend. In Proceedings of First Scandinavian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (SCAI), pages 53-68, Tromso, Norway.
60. Jönsson and Dahlbäck, 2000] Jönsson, A. and Dahlbäck, N. (2000). Distilling dialogues - A method using natural dialogue corpora for dialogue systems development. In Proceedings of the 6th Applied Natural Language Processing Conference, pages 44-51. McGraw-Hill.
61. Jovanovic et al., 2006] Jovanovic, N., op den Akker, R., and Nijholt, A. (2006). A corpus for studying addressing behaviour in multi-party dialogues. Language Resources and Evaluation, 40(1):5-23.
62. Jurafsky and Martin, 2000] Jurafsky, D. and Martin, J. H. (2000). Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
63. Kamm et al., 1999] Kamm, A., Walker, M., and Litman, D. (1999). Evaluating spoken language systems. In Proceedings of American Voice Input/Output Society AVIOS.
64. Kipp, 2001] Kipp, M. (2001). ANVIL - A generic annotation tool for multimodal dialogue. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH), Aalborg, Denmark.
65. Klein and Manning, 2003] Klein, D. and Manning, C. (2003). Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 423-430, Sapporo, Japan.
66. Kronlid, 2008] Kronlid, F. (2008). Steps Towards Multi-Party Dialogue Management. PhD thesis, Göteborg University, Sweden.
67. Kruskal and Wallis, 1952] Kruskal, W. and Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47:583-621.
68. Kubrick, 1968] Kubrick, S. (Director). (1968). 2001 - A Space Odyssey. Motion Picture] Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures Inc. (MGM), USA.
69. Larsson, 2002] Larsson, S. (2002). Issue-based Dialogue Management. PhD thesis, Göteborg University, Sweden.
70. Larsson et al., 2000] Larsson, S., Ljunglof, P., Cooper, R., Engdahl, E., and Ericsson, S. (2000). GoDiS - An accommodating dialogue system. In Proceedings of the ANLP/NAACL Workshop on Conversational Systems, pages 7-10, Seattle, WA, USA.
71. Larsson and Traum, 2000] Larsson, S. and Traum, D. R. (2000). Information state and dialogue management in the TRINDI dialogue move engine toolkit. Natural Language Engineering, 6(3-4):323-340.
72. Lemon et al., 2001] Lemon, O., Bracy, A., Gruenstein, A., and Peters, S. (2001). The WITAS multi-modal dialogue system I. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH), pages 1559-1562, Aalborg, Denmark.
73. Lemon et al., 2006] Lemon, O., Georgila, K., and Henderson, J. (2006). Evaluating effectiveness and portability of reinforcement learning dialogue strategies with real users: The TALK TownInfo evaluation. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE-ACL Workshop on Spoken Language Technology (SLT), pages 182-186, Aruba.
74. Levin and Pieraccini, 1997] Levin, E. and Pieraccini, R. (1997). A stochastic model of computer-human interaction for learning dialogue strategies. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH), pages 1883-1886, Rhodes, Greece.
75. Mana et al., 2007] Mana, N., Lepri, B., Chippendale, P., Cappelletti, A., Pianesi, F., Svaizer, P., and Zancanaro, M. (2007). Multimodal corpus of multi-party meetings for automatic social behaviour analysis and personality traits detection. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI), Nagoya, Japan.
76. Mann and Whitney, 1947] Mann, H. B. and Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18:50-60.
77. Matheson et al., 2000] Matheson, C., Poesio, M., and Traum, D. (2000). Modelling grounding and discourse obligations using update rules. In Proceedings of the first conference on North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL), pages 1-8, Seattle, WA, USA.
78. McCowan et al., 2005] McCowan, I., Gatica-Perez, D., Bengio, S., Lathoud, G., Barnard, M., and Zhang, D. (2005). Automatic analysis of multimodal group actions in meetings. In IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, volume 27, pages 305-317.
79. McTear, 2002] McTear, M. F. (2002). Spoken dialogue technology: Enabling the conversational user interface. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA.
80. Michel et al., 2007] Michel, M., Ajot, J., and Fiscus, J. (2007). The NIST Meeting Room Corpus 2 Phase 1, volume 4299/2006, pages 13-23. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
81. Minker et al., 1999] Minker, W., Waibel, A., and Mariani, J. (1999). Stochasticallybased semantic analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, USA.
82. Möller, 2005] Möller, S. (2005). Quality of Telephone-Based Spoken Dialogue Systems. Springer, New York, NY, USA.
83. Moore, 2002] Moore, D. (2002). The IDIAP smart meeting room. Technical report, IDIAP, Martigny, Switzerland.
84. Mostefa et al., 2007] Mostefa, D., Moreau, N., Choukri, K., Potamianos, G., Chu, S. M., Tyagi, A., Casas, J. R., Turmo, J., Cristofetti, L., Tobia, F., Pnevmatikakis, A., Mylonakis, V., Talantzis, F., Burger, S., Stiefelhagen, R., Bernardin, K., and Rochet, C. (2007). The CHIL audiovisual corpus for lecture and meeting analysis inside smart rooms. Language Resources and Evaluation, 41(3-4):389-407.
85. Nielsen, 1993] Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Boston, MA, USA.
86. Paek, 2001] Paek, T. (2001). Empirical methods for evaluating dialogue systems. In von Kuppevelt, J. and Smith, R., editors, Proceedings of the 2nd SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 100-107, Aalborg, Denmark.
87. Petukhova and Bunt, 2007] Petukhova, V. and Bunt, H. (2007). A multidimensional approach to multimodal dialogue act annotation. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS-7), pages 142-153, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
88. Pianesi et al., 2007] Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M., Lepri, B., and Cappelletti, A. (2007). A multimodal annotated corpus of consensus decision making meetings. Language Resources and Evaluation, 3:409-429.
89. Poesio and Traum, 1998] Poesio, M. and Traum, D. (1998). Towards an axiomatization of dialogue acts. In Proceedings of the Twente Workshop on the Formal Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogues, pages 207-222, Twente, The Netherlands.
90. Qu and Beale, 1999] Qu, Y. and Beale, S. (1999). A constraint-based model for cooperative response generation in information dialogues. In Proceedings of the 16th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI/IAAI), pages 148-155, Orlando, FL, USA.
91. Rabiner and Juang, 1993] Rabiner, L. and Juang, B.-H. (1993). Fundamentals of speech recognition. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
92. Reilly, 1987] Reilly, R. (1987). III-formedness and miscommunication in personmachine dialogue. Information and Software Technology, 29(2):69-74.
93. Reiter, 1994] Reiter, E. (1994). Has a consensus NL generation architecture appeared, and is it psycholinguistically plausible? In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 163-170, Kennebunkport, ME, USA.
94. Reiter and Dale, 2000] Reiter, E. and Dale, R. (2000). Building natural language generation systems. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.
95. Renals, 2005] Renals, S. (2005). AMI: Augmented Multiparty Interaction. In Proceedings of the NIST Meeting Transcription Workshop, Montreal, Canada.
96. Rickel et al., 2002] Rickel, J., Marsella, S., Gratch, J., Hill, R., Traum, D., and Swartout, W. (2002). Toward a new generation of virtual humans for interactive experiences. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17:32-38.
97. Robinson et al., 2004] Robinson, S., Martinovski, B., Garg, S., Stephan, J., and Traum, D. (2004). Issues in corpus development for multi-party multi-modal task-oriented dialogue. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 1707-1710, Lisbon, Portugal.
98. Scherer and Strauβ, 2008] Scherer, S. and Strauβ, P.-M. (2008). A exible wizard of oz environment for rapid prototyping. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 958-961, Marrakech, Morocco.
99. Searle, 1969] Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
100. Searle, 1975] Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts:59-82.
101. Seneff et al., 1996] Seneff, S., Goddeau, D., Pao, C., and Polifroni, J. (1996). Multimodal discourse modelling in a multi-user multi-domain environment. In Proceedings of ICSLP '96, volume 1, pages 192-195, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
102. Singh et al., 2002] Singh, S., Litman, D., Kearns, M., and Walker, M. (2002). Optimizing dialogue management with reinforcement learning: Experimenting with the NJFun system. Artificial Intelligence Research, 16:105-133.
103. Stiefelhagen et al., 2004] Stiefelhagen, R., Steusloff, H., and Waibel, A. (2004). CHIL - Computers in the Human Interaction Loop. In Proceedings of the NIST ICASSP Meeting Recognition Workshop, Montreal, Canada.
104. Strauβ, 2006] Strauβ, P.-M. (2006). A SLDS for perception and interaction in multi-user environments. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEE International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE), Athens, Greece.
105. Strauβ et al., 2007] Strauβ, P.-M., Hoffmann, H., and Scherer, S. (2007). Evaluation and User Acceptance of a Dialogue System Using Wizard-of-Oz Recordings. In Proceedings of the 3rd IET International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE), Ulm, Germany.
106. Strauβ and Jahn, 2007] Strauβ, P.-M. and Jahn, M. (2007). Using frame semantics on a domain dependent corpus. In Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Modeling and Representation in Computational Semantics (MRCS), Hyderabad, India.
107. Swartout et al., 2005] Swartout, W., Gratch, J., Hill Jr., R. W., Hovy, E., Lindheim, R., Marcella, S., Rickel, J., and Traum, D.). Simulation meets Hollywood: Integrating graphics, sound, story and character for immersive simulation. In Stock, O. and Zancanaro, M., editors, Multimodal Intelligent Information Presentation. Series: Text, Speech and Language Technology, volume 27. Kluwer.
108. Swartout, 2006] Swartout, W. R. (2006). Virtual humans. In Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the 18th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference (AAAI), Boston, MA, USA.
109. Traum, 2003] Traum, D. (2003). Semantics and pragmatics of questions and answers of dialogue agents. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Computational Semantics, pages 380-394.
110. Traum, 2004] Traum, D. (2004). Issues in multi-party dialogues. In Dignum, F., editor, Advances in agent communication, pages 201-211. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2922, Springer.
111. Traum and Allen, 1994] Traum, D. and Allen, J. (1994). Discourse obligations in dialogue processing. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (ACL), 32:1-8.
112. Traum et al., 1999] Traum, D., Bos, J., Cooper, R., Larsson, S., Lewin, I., Matheson, C., and Poesio, M. (1999). A model of dialogue moves and information state revision. Technical report, Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University, Sweden.
113. Traum, 1996] Traum, D. R. (1996). Conversational agency: The TRAINS-93 dialogue manager. In Proceedings of the Twente Workshop on Langauge Technology: Dialogue Management in Natural Language Systems (TWLT), pages 1-11, Twente, The Netherlands.
114. Traum, 2000] Traum, D. R. (2000). 20 questions on dialogue act taxonomies. Journal of Semantics, 17(1):7-30.
115. Viola and Jones, 2004] Viola, P. and Jones, M. (2004). Robust real-Time face detection. International Journal of Computer Vision, 57(2):137-154.
116. Walker et al., 2000] Walker, M., Kamm, A., and Bol, J. (2000). Developing and testing general models of spoken dialogue system performance. In Proceedings of the 2nd Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), Athens, Greece.
117. Walker et al., 1997] Walker, M. A., Litman, D. J., Kamm, C. A., and Abella, A. (1997). PARADISE: A framework for evaluating spoken dialogue agents. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 271-280, Madrid, Spain.
118. Walker et al., 2004] Walker, M. A., Whittaker, S. J., Stent, A., Maloor, P., Moore, J. D., Johnston, M., and Vasireddy, G. (2004). Generation and evaluation of user tailored responses in multimodal dialogue. Cognitive Science, 28(5):811-840.
119. Whittaker et al., 2002] Whittaker, S. J., Walker, M. A., and Moore, J. D. (2002). Fish or fowl: A wizard of oz evaluation of dialogue strategies in the restaurant domain. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain.
120. Williams and Young, 2007] Williams, J. and Young, S. (2007). Partially observable markov decision processes for spoken dialogue systems. Computer Speech and Language, 21(2).
121. Xu et al., 2002] Xu, W., Xu, B., Huang, T., and Xia, H. (2002). Bridging the gap between dialogue management and dialogue models. In Proceedings of the 3rd SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 201-210, Philadelphia, PA, USA.