A corpus for studying addressing behaviour in multi-party dialogues

Language Resources and Evaluation

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 5-23

  Jovanovic, Natasa ^a   Op Den Akker, Rieks ^a   Nijholt, Anton ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Addressing; Annotation schemas; Multi party dialogues; Multimodal corpora; Reliability analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 37849185259     PISSN: 1574020X     EISSN: 15728412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10579-006-9006-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Bakx, I., van Turnhout, K., & Terken, J. (2003). Facial orientation during multi-party interaction with information Kiosks. In Proceedings of the 9th IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT), (pp. 701-704). Zurich, Switzerland
2. Burger, S., & Sloane, Z. (2004). The ISL meeting corpus: Categorical features of communicative group interactions. In Proceedings of the NIST ICASSP Meeting Recognition Workshop. Montreal, Canada
3. Carletta, J. (1996). Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2), 249-254
4. Carletta, J., Anderson, A. H., & Garrod, S. (2002). Seeing eye to eye: An account of grounding and understanding in work groups. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 9(1), 1-20
5. Carletta, J., Ashby, S., Bourban, S. M., Flynn, M. G., Hain, T., Kadlec, J., Karaiskos, V., Kraaij, W., Kronenthal, M., Lathoud, G., Lincoln, M., Lisowska, A., McCowan, I., Post, W., Reidsma, D., & Wellner, P. (2006). The AMI meeting corpus: A pre-announcement. In S. Renals & S. Bengio (Eds.), Machine learning for multimodal interaction, Second International Workshop, MLMI 2005, Edinburgh, UK, July, 2005, revised selected papers, vol 3869 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 28-39). Springer-Verlag. ISBN 3-540-32549-2
6. Carletta, J., Evert, S., Heid, U., Kilgour, J., Robertson, J., & Voormann, H. (2003). The NITE XML toolkit: Flexible annotation for multi-modal language data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35(3), 353-363
7. Carletta, J., Isard, A., Isard, S., Kowtko, J., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Anderson, A. (1997). The reliability of a dialogue structure coding scheme. Computational Linguistics, 23(1), 13-31
8. Chen, L., Rose, R. T., Parrill, F., Han, X., Tu, J., Huang, Z., Harper, M., Quek, F., McNeill, D., Tuttle, R., & Huang, T. (2006). VACE multimodal meeting corpus. In S. Renais & S. Bengio (Eds.), Machine learning for multimodal interaction, Second International Workshop, MLMI 2005, Edinburgh, UK, July, 2005, revised selected papers, vol 3869 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 40-51). Springer-Verlag. ISBN 3-540-32549-2
9. Clark, H. H. & Carlson, T. B. (1992). Hearers and speech acts. In H. H. Clark (Ed.), Arenas of Language Use (pp. 205-247). University of Chicago Press and CSLI
10. Clark, A., & Popescu-Belis, A. (2004). Multi-level dialogue act tags. In Proceedings of the 5th SIGdial Work-shop on Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 163-170). Cambridge, MA
11. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46
12. Dhillon, R., Bhagat, S., Carvey, H., & Shriberg, E. (2004). Meeting recorder project: Dialogue act labeling guide. Technical report TR-04-002, International Computer Science Institute (ICSI), Berkeley, CA, USA
13. Garofolo, J. S., Laprun, C. D., Michel, M., Stanford, V. M., & Tabassi, E. (2004) The NIST meeting room pilot corpus. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC) (pp. 1411-1414). Lisbon, Portugal
14. Goffman, E. (1981). Footing. In Goffman, E., (Ed.), Forms of talk (pp. 124-159). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press
15. Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press
16. Hirschberg, J., & Nakatani, C. (1996). A prosodic analysis of discourse segments in direction-giving monologues. In In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) (pp 286-293). Santa Cruz, California
17. Janin, A., Ang, J., Bhagat, S., Dhillon, R., Edwards, J., Macias-Guarasa, J., Morgan, N., Peskin, B., Shriberg, E., Stolcke, A., Wooters, C., & Wrede, B. (2004). The ICSI meeting project: Resources and research. In Proceedings of the NIST ICASSP Meeting Recognition Workshop. Montreal, Canada
18. Jovanovic, N., & op den Akker, R. (2004). Towards automatic addressee identification in multi-party dialogues. In Proceedings of the 5th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 89-92). Cambridge, MA
19. Jovanovic, N., op den Akker, R., & Nijholt, A. (2006). Addressee identification in face-to-face meetings. In Proceeding of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL) (pp. 169-176). Trento, Italy
20. Jurafsky, D., Shriberg, L., & Biasca, D. (1997). Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL Shallow-Discourse-Function Annotation Coders Manual, Draft 13. Technical report 97-02, University of Colorado, The Institute of Cognitive Science, Boulder, CO
21. Katzenmaier, M., Stiefelhagen, R., & Schultz, T. (2004). Identifying the addressee in human-human-robot interactions based on head pose and speech. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI) (pp. 144-151). State College, PA
22. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA
23. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411-433
24. Manning, C., & Schutze, H. (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
25. Moore, D. (2002). The IDIAP smart meeting room. Technical report IDIAP-COM-07, IDIAP, Martigny, Switzerland
26. Otsuka, K., Takemae, Y., Yamato, J., & Murase, H. (2005). A probabilistic inference of multiparty-conversation structure based on Markov-switching models of gaze patterns, head directions, and utterances. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI) (pp. 191-198). Trento, Italy
27. Passonneau, R. (2004). Computing reliability for coreference annotation. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC) (pp. 1503-1506). Lisbon, Portugal
28. Passonneau, R. & Litman, D. (1997). Discourse segmentation by human and automated means. Computational Linguistics, 23(1), 103-139
29. Reidsma, D., Hofs, D., & Jovanovic, N. (2005). A presentation of a set of new annotation tools based on the NXT API. In Proceedings of Measuring Behavior (pp. 512-513). Wageningen, The Netherlands
30. Shriberg, E., Dhillon, R., Bhagat, S., Ang, J., & Carvey, H. (2004). The ICSI meeting recorder dialog act (MRDA) corpus. In Proceedings of the 5th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 97-100). Boston, USA
31. Traum, D. (2004). Issues in multi-party dialogues. In F. Dignum (Ed.), Advances in agent communication (pp. 201-211). Springer-Verlag LNCS
32. van Turnhout, K., Terken, J., Bakx, I., & Eggen, B. (2005). Identifying the intended addressee in mixed human-human and human-computer interaction from non-verbal features. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI) (pp.175-182). Trento, Italy