Structure of Spanish scientific collaboration in library and information sciences (Scopus 1999-2007).;Estructura de la colaboración científica española en Biblioteconomía y Documentación (Scopus 1999-2007)

Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecologia

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 105-123

  Vargas Quesada, Benjamín ^a   Minguillo, David ^b   Chinchilla Rodríguez, Zaida ^c   De Moya Anegón, Félix ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUTO DE HISTORIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Co authorship; Collaboration networks; Global centrality; Library and information sciences; Scientific collaboration; Social network analysis; Spain

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867791041     PISSN: 01200976     EISSN: 25389866     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. BARABASI, A.L., et al. 2002. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 311, no. 3-4, p. 590-614.
2. BATAGELJ, V., and MRVAR, A. 2010. Pajek 1.26: package for large network analysis [en línea] [citado marzo 12, 2010]. Disponible en: http://pajek.imfm.si
3. BILGIC, M. et al. 2006. D-Dupe 2.0: a novel tool for interactive data deduplication and integration. [en línea]. citado marzo 12, 2010] Disponible en: http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/linqs/ddupe/index.htm.
4. BORGATTI, S.P., EVERETT, M.G., and FREEMAN, L.C. 2002. UCINET 6 for Windows: software for social networks analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
5. CANO, V. 1999. Bibliometric overview of library and information science research in Spain. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 50, no. 8, p. 675-680.
6. DELGADO LÓPEZ-CÓZAR, E. 2002. La investigación en Biblioteconomía y Documentación. Gijón: Trea
7. ELSEVIER 2005. Scopus. [en línea] Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005 [citado marzo 12, 2010] Disponible en: http://www.scopus.com
8. FREEMAN, L.C. 1977. A set of measures of centrality based on betweeness. Sociometry, vol. 40, no. 1, p. 35-41.
9. FREEMAN, L.C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Social Networks, vol. 1, no. 3, p. 215-239.
10. GLÄNZEL, W., and SCHUBERT, A. 2004. Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In: MOED, H., GLÄNZEL, W. and SCHMOCH, U., eds. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. GRANOVETTER, M.S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 78, no. 6, p. 1360-1380.
12. HOU, H.; KRETSCHMER, H., and LIU, Z. 2008. The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics. Scientometrics, vol. 75, no. 2, p. 189-202.
13. JÄRVELIN, K., and VAKKARI, P. 1993. The evolution of library and information science 1965-1985: a content analysis of journal articles. Information Processing and Management, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 129-144.
14. KAMADA, T. and KAWAI, S. 1989. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, vol. 31, no. 1, p. 7-15.
15. KRETSCHMER, H. 2004. Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the Web. Scientometrics, vol. 60, no. 3, p. 409-420.
16. KRETSCHMER, H., and AGUILLO, I. F. 2004. Visibility of collaboration on the Web. Scientometrics, vol. 61, no. 3, p. 405-426.
17. MOYA-ANEGON, F. de, et al. 2007. Coverage analysis of Scopus: a journal metric approach. Scientometrics, vol. 73, no. 1, p. 53-78.
18. NEWMAN, M. 2004. Who is the best connected scientist?: a study of scientific coauthorship networks. In: Ben-Naim, E.; Frauenfelder, H. and Toroczkai Z. (eds.). Complex networks. Part III Information Networks & Social Networks. Berlin: Springer, vol. 650, p. 337-370
19. ORTEGA, L.L., y AGUILLO, I. F. 2007. La web académica española en el contexto del espacio europeo de educación superior: estudio exploratorio. El Profesional de la Información, vol. 16, no. 5, p. 417-425.
20. OTTE, E. and ROUSSEAU, R. 2002. Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, vol. 28, no. 6, p. 441-453.
21. SCImago RESEARCH GROUP. 2005. Producción española con visibilidad internacional (ISI-WOS) en Biblioteconomía y Documentación (I). El Profesional de la Información, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 459-461.
22. SCImago RESEARCH GROUP. 2006. Producción española con visibilidad internacional (ISI-WOS) en Biblioteconomía y Documentación (II).El Profesional de la Información, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 34-36.
23. SCImago RESEARCH GROUP. 2007. SJR - SCImago Journal y Country Rank. [en línea]. Madrid: SCImago, 2007. [citado marzo 12, 2010] Disponible en: http://www.scimagojr.com
24. SCOTT, J. 2000. Social network analysis: a handbook. Los Angeles: Sage.
25. VARGAS-QUESADA, B. and MOYA-ANEGÓN, F. 2007. Visualizing the structure of science. Berlin: Springer.
26. WASSERMAN, S. and FAUST, K. 1998. Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. WATT, R. J.C. 2004. Concordance, text analysis and concordance software.
28. WHITE, H.D. and MCCAIN, K.W. 1998. Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 49, no. 4, p. 327-355.
29. ZHU, W., CHEN, C. and ALLEN, B. 2008. Analyzing the propagation of influence and concept evolution in enterprise social networks through centrality and latent semantic analysis. Berlin: Springer.