Visibility of collaboration on the Web

Scientometrics

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 405-426

  Kretschmer, Hildrun ^a   Aguillo, Isidro F ^b  

^a ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b la Tecnologia y la Innovacion   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 6344238733     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045118.68430.fd     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BALABAN, A. T., KLEIN, D. J. (2002), Co-authorship, rational Erdös numbers, and resistance distances in graphs, Scientometrics, 55 : 59-70.
2. BASU, A., AGGARWAL, R. (2001), International collaboration in science in India and its impact on international performance, Scientometrics, 52 : 379-394.
3. BATAGELJ, V., FERLIGOJ, A., DOREIAN, P. (1992), Direct and indirect methods for structural equivalence, Social Networks, 14 : 63-90.
4. BEAVER, D. DEB., ROSEN, R. (1978), Studies in scientific collaboration. Part III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 3 : 231-245.
5. BORGMAN, C. L., FURNER, J. (2002), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. In: B. CRONIN (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 36, Medford, NJ: Information Today,pp. 3-72.
6. BRAUN, T., GLÄNZEL, W., SCHUBERT, A. (2001), Publication and cooperation patterns of the authors of neuroscience journals. Scientometrics, 51 : 499-510.
7. DAVIS, M., WILSON, C. S. (2002), Elite researchers in ophthalmology: Aspects of publishing strategies, collaboration and multi-disciplinarity. Scientometrics, 52 : 395-410.
8. GLÄNZEL, W. (2002), Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50 : 461-473.
9. GENEST, C., THIBAULT, C. (2001), Investigating the concentration within a research community using joint publications and co-authorship via intermediaries. Scientometrics, 51 : 429-440.
10. HAVEMANN, F. (2001), Collaboration behaviour of Berlin life science researchers in the last two decades of the twentieth century as reflected in the Science Citation Index, Scientometrics, 52 : 435-444.
11. HERRING, S. C. (2002), Computer-mediated communication on the Internet. In: CRONIN, B. (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 36, Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc., pp. 109-168.
12. INGWERSEN, P. (1998), The calculation of Web Impact Factors. Journal of Documentation, 54 (2) : 236-243.
13. KLING, R., MCKIM, G. (2000), Not just a matter of time: field differences in the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (14) : 1306-1320.
14. KRETSCHMER, H., LIANG, L., KUNDRA, R. (2001), Foundation of a global interdisciplinary research network (COLLNET) with Berlin as the virtual center, Scientometrics, 52 : 531-538.
15. KRETSCHMER, H., THELWALL, M. (2003), The development of information professionals: The European perspective- The way from librametry to webometrics. In: A. AMUDHAVALLI (Ed.), Proceedings of the MALA Platinum Jubilee Celebrations, Seminar on Information Professionals for the Digital Era, Madras, India, January 29-30, 2003, EFEX: Chennai, pp. 13-25.
16. KRETSCHMER, H. (2003), Author productivity and Erdos distances in co-authorship and in Web networks. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Beijing, August 25-28, 2003 (forthcoming).
17. KUNDRA, R., TOMOV, D. (2001), Collaboration patterns in Indian and Bulgarian epidemiology of neoplasms in Medline for 1966-1999.
18. NEWMAN, M. (2001), The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 98 : 404-409.
19. OTTE, E., ROUSSEAU, R. (2002), Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28 : 443-455.
20. PRICE, D. J. DE SOLLA (1963), Little Science, Big Science, New York: Columbia University Press.
21. SCHUBERT, A. (2002), The Web of Scientometrics. A statistical overview of the first 50 volumes of the journal. Scientometrics, 53 : 3-20.
22. TERVEEN, L. G., HILL, W. C. (1998), Evaluating Emergent Collaboration on the Web, In: Proceedings of CSCW 1998 Seattle WA, ACM Press, pp. 355-362.
23. THELWALL, M. (2003), What is the link doing here? Beginning a fine-grained process of identifying reasons for academic hyperlink creation. Information Research, 8.
24. VAUGHAN, L., SHAW, D. (2003), Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (14) : 1313-1322.
25. WAGNER-DÖBLER, R. (2001), Continuity and discontinuity of collaboration behaviour since 1800- from a bibliometric point of view, Scientometrics, 52 : 503-518.
26. WASSERMAN, S., FAUST, K. (1994), Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. WILKINSON, D., HARRIES, G., THELWALL, M., PRICE, L. (2003), Motivation for academic web site interlinking: evidence for the web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication. Journal of Information Science, 29 : 59-66.