Assessment of electricity generation technologies based on ghg emission reduction potential and costs

Transformations in Business and Economics

Volumn 11, Issue 2 A, 2012, Pages 333-343

  Streimikiene, Dalia ^a   Balezentiene, Ligita ^b  

^a VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

^b VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Costs; Electricity generation technologies; GHG emission reduction potential; Interval TOPSIS; Life cycle assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867757812     PISSN: 16484460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baležentis, A., Baležentis, T., Brauers, W.K.M. (2012b), "Personnel selection based on computing with words and fuzzy MULTIMOORA", Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 39, No 9, pp.7961-7967.
2. Baležentis, A., Baležentis, T., Misiünas, A. (2012a), "An integrated assessment of Lithuanian economic sectors based on financial ratios and fuzzy MCDM methods", Technological and Economic Development of Economy, V ol. 18,No l,pp.34-53.
3. Ekvall, T. (1999), "Key methodological issues for life cycle inventory analysis of paper recycling", Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 7, No 4, pp.281-294.
4. EU Framework 6 (2007), European Sustainable Electricity, Comprehensive Analysis of Future European demand and Generation of European Electricity and its Security of Supply, EUSUSTEL, Final technical report.
5. EUR-lex (2011), Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions, Energy Efficiency Plan 2011, available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52011DC0109:EN:HTML: NOT, referred on 06/10/2011.
6. EUR-lex (2011), Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions, A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050, available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do? uri=CELEX:52011DC0112:EN:NOT, referred on 06/10/2011%.
7. Farrell, A.E., Plevin, R.J., Turner, B.T., Jones, A.D., O'Hare, M., Kammen, D.M. (2006), "Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals", Science, Vol. 311, No 5760, pp.506-508.
8. Fouladgar, M.M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Lashgari, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. (2012b), "Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and COPRAS under fuzzy environment", International journal of strategic property management, Vol. 16, No 1, pp.85-104.
9. Fouladgar, M.M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Yakhchali, S.H., Ghasempourabadi, M.H. (2012a), "Project Portfolio Selection Using Fuzzy AHP and VIKOR Techniques", Transformations in Business & Economics, Vol. 11, No 1 (25), pp.213-231.
10. Fritsche, U.R., Lim, S.S. (2006), Comparison of GHG emissions and abatement costs of nuclear and alternative energy options from a life cycle perspective, Oko-Institut.
11. Gluch, P., Baumann, H. (2004), "The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making", Building and Environment, Vol. 39, Issue 5, pp.571-580.
12. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K. (1981), Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, Springer, Verlag, Berlin.
13. ICF International (2009), GHG impact of the economic stimulus package, Preliminary Findings, Summary Report.
14. Jahanshahloo, G.R., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Izadikhah, M. (2006), "An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data", Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 175, No 2, pp.1375-1384.
15. 2 emissions", Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 25, No 3, pp.273-285.
16. PSI (2003), Integrated Assessment of Sustainable Energy Systems in China -The China Energy Technology Program (CETP) - A Framework for Decision Support in the Electric Sector of Shandong Province.
17. Rhode, S. (2005), "Engineering economic analysis of biomass IGCC with carbon capture and storage", Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 29, No 6, pp.440-450.
18. Streimikiene, D. (2005), "Assessment of energy technologies based on carbon price development", available at, http://www.feemproject. NetplanetsplastoreScientific%20PublicationsStreimikiene-Bangalore%20paper.pdf., referred on 06/10/2011.
19. Streimikiene, D. (2010), "Comparative assessment of future power generation technologies based on carbon price development", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 14, Issue 4, pp. 1283-1292.
20. Weiser, D. (2008), A guide to life-cycle GHG emissions from electric supply technologies, Vienna, IAEA.
21. Wrisberg, H., Udo, A., de Haes, U., Triebswetter, P., Clif, R. (2002), Analytical tools for a environmental design and management in a systems perspective, Ecoejficiency in Industry and Science, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
22. Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. (2011), "Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview", Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 17, No 2, pp.397-42.