Native jewelweed, but not other native species, displays post-invasion trait divergence

Oikos

Volumn 121, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1849-1859

  Dostál, Petr ^a,b   Weiser, Martin ^c   Koubek, Tomáš ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^c CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COEXISTENCE; CONSPECIFIC; DICOTYLEDON; DIVERGENCE; FITNESS; GERMINATION; INVASIVE SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; PHENOLOGY; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; SHADE TOLERANCE;

GALEOPSIS SPECIOSA; IMPATIENS; IMPATIENS CAPENSIS; IMPATIENS NOLI-TANGERE; IMPATIENS PARVIFLORA;

EID: 84867745599     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.20333.x     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Aphalo P. J. and Ballaré C. L. 1995. On the importance of information-acquiring systems in plant-plant interactions. - Funct. Ecol. 9: 5-14.
2. Bischoff A. and Müller-Schärer H. 2010. Testing population differentiation in plant species - how important are environmental maternal effects. - Oikos 119: 445-454.
3. Cadotte M. W. et al. 2008. Evolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105: 17012-17017.
4. Cahill J. F. et al. 2008. Does phylogenetic relatedness influence the strength of competition among vascular plants? - Persp. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 10: 41-50.
5. Callaway R. M. et al. 2005. Natural selection for resistance to the allelopathic effects of invasive plants. - J. Ecol. 93: 576-583.
6. Carlton J. T. et al. 1999. Historical extinctions in the sea. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 30: 515-538.
7. Carroll S. P. et al. 2007. Evolution on ecological time-scales. - Funct. Ecol. 21: 387-393.
8. Chapin F. S. 1980. The mineral nutrition of wild plants. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 233-260.
9. Chesson P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 31: 343-366.
10. Chmura D. and Sierka E. 2007. The invasibility of deciduous forest communities after disturbance: a case study of Carex brizoides and Impatiens parviflora invasion. - For. Ecol. Manage. 242: 487-495.
11. Coombe D. E. 1956. Biological flora of British Isles: Impatiens parviflora DC. - J. Ecol. 44: 701-714.
12. D'Antonio C. M. 2000. Fire, plant invasions and global change. - In: Mooney H. A. and Hobbs R. J. (eds), Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, pp. 65-93.
13. Dayan T. and Simberloff D. 2005. Ecological and community-wide character displacement: the next generation. - Ecol. Lett. 8: 875-894.
14. Donohue K. et al. 2000. Evidence of adaptive divergence in plasticity: density- and site-dependent selection on shade-avoidance responses in Impatiens capensis. - Evolution 54: 1956-1968.
15. Donohue K. et al. 2007. Diversification of phytochrome contributions to germination as a function of seed-maturation environment. - New Phytol. 177: 367-379.
16. Dostál P. 2011. Plant competitive interactions and invasiveness: searching for the effects of phylogenetic relatedness and origin on competition intensity. - Am. Nat. 177: 655-667.
17. Ellstrand N. C. and Schierenbeck K. A. 2000. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97: 7043-7050.
18. Franklin K. A. 2008. Shade avoidance. - New Phytol. 179: 930-944.
19. Gaudet C. L. and Keddy P. A. 1988. A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits. - Nature 334: 242-243.
20. Godefroid S. and Koedam N. 2010. Comparative ecology and coexistence of introduced and native congeneric forest herbs: Impatiens parviflora and I. noli-tangere. - Plant Ecol. Evol. 143: 119-127.
21. Godoy O. et al. 2011. Forests are not immune to plant invasions: phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation allow Prunella vulgaris to colonize a temperate evergreen rainforest. - Biol. Invas. 13: 1615-1625.
22. Goergen E. M. et al. 2011. Native perennial grasses show evolutionary response to Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass) invasion. - PLoS One 6: e18145.
23. Goldberg D. E. and Fleetwood L. 1987. Competitive effect and response in four annual plants. - J. Ecol. 75: 1131-1143.
24. Goldberg D. E. et al. 1999. Empirical approaches to quantifying interaction intensity: competition and facilitation along productivity gradients. - Ecology 80: 1118-1131.
25. Graae B. J. et al. 2004. The importance of recruitment limitation in forest plant species colonization: a seed sowing experiment. - Flora 199: 263-270.
26. Grubb P. J. 1977. The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. - Biol. Rev. 52: 107-145.
27. Hatcher P. E. 2003. Biological flora of British Isles: Impatiens noli-tangere L. - J. Ecol. 91: 147-167.
28. Hejda M. et al. 2009. Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. - J. Ecol. 97: 393-403.
29. Hoagland D. R. and Arnon D. I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. - Calif. Agric. Exp. Station 347: 1-32.
30. Lambdon P. W. et al. 2008. Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. - Preslia 80: 101-149.
31. Lau J. A. 2006. Evolutionary response of native plants to novel community members. - Evolution 60: 56-63.
32. Lavergne S. and Molofsky J. 2007. Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104: 3883-3888.
33. Leger E. A. 2008. The adaptive value of remnant native plants in invaded communities: an example from the Great Basin. - Ecol. Appl. 18: 1226-1235.
34. Levine J. M. et al. 2003. Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. - Proc. R. Soc. B 270: 775-781.
35. Littell R. C. et al. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. - SAS Inst.
36. Lodge D. M. 1993. Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 133-137.
37. MacDougall A. S. et al. 2009. Plant invasions and the niche. - J. Ecol. 97: 609-615.
38. MacNeil C. et al.2001 Coexistence among native and introduced freshwater amphipods (Crustacea); habitat utilization patterns in littoral habitats. - Arch. Hydrobiol. 151: 591-607.
39. Maron J. L. et al. 2004. Rapid evolution of an invasive plant. - Ecol. Monogr. 74: 261-280.
40. McGoey B. V. and Stinchcombe J. R. 2009. Interspecific competition alters natural selection on shade avoidance phenotypes in Impatiens capensis. - New Phytol. 183: 880-891.
41. Mealor B. A. and Hild A. L. 2007. Post-invasion evolution of native plant populations: a test of biological resilience. - Oikos 116: 1493-1500.
42. Mooney H. A. and Cleland E. E. 2001. The evolutionary impact of invasive species. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98: 5446-5451.
43. Orrock J. L. and Christopher C. C. 2010. Density of intraspecific competitors determines the occurrence and benefits of acce lerated germination. - Am. J. Bot. 97: 694-699.
44. Peacor S. D. et al. 2006. Phenotypic plasticity opposes species invasions by altering fitness surface. - PLoS Biol. 4: 2112-2120.
45. Perglová I. et al. 2009. Differences in germination and seedling establishment of alien and native Impatiens species. - Preslia 81: 357-375.
46. Porter S. D. and Savignano D. 1990. An invasion of polygyne fire ants decimates native ants and disrupts arthropod community. - Ecology 71: 2095-2106.
47. Rathcke B. and Lacey E. P. 1985. Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 16: 179-214.
48. Rodda G. H. et al. 1977. The disappearance of Guam's wildlife. New insights for herpetology, evolutionary ecology, and conservation. - BioScience 47: 565-574.
49. Rowe C. L. J. and Leger E. A. 2011. Competitive seedlings and inherited traits: a test of rapid evolution of Elymus multisetus (big squirreltail) in response to cheatgrass invasion. - Evol. Appl. 4: 485-498.
50. Schluter D. and McPhail J. D. 1992. Ecological character displacement and speciation in sticklebacks. - Am. Nat. 140: 85-108.
51. Skálová H. and Pyšek P. 2009. Germination and establishment of invasive and native Impatiens species in species-specific microsites. - Neobiota 8: 101-109.
52. Slavík B. 1997. Impatiens parviflora. - In: Slaví k B. et al. (eds), Květena České republiky [Flora of the Czech Republic]. Academia, Praha, pp. 234-236.
53. Solarz S. L. and Newman R. M. 2001. Variation in host plant preference and performance by the milfoil weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz, exposed to native and exotic watermilfoils. - Oecologia 126: 66-75.
54. Stinson K. A. et al. 2006. Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms. - PLoS Biol. 4: 727-731.
55. Strauss S. Y. et al. 2006. Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities? - Ecol. Lett. 9: 357-374.
56. Thompson K. et al. 1997. The soil seed bank of northwest Europe: methodology, density and longevity. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
57. van Kleunen M. and Fischer M. 2001. Adaptive evolution of plastic foraging responses in a clonal plant. - Ecology 82: 3309-3319.
58. Verdú M. and Traveset A. 2005. Early emergence enhances plant fitness: a phylogenetically controlled meta-analysis. - Ecology 86: 1385-1394.
59. Vitousek P. M. et al. 1987. Biological invasion by Myrica faya alters ecosystem development in Hawaii. - Science 238: 802-804.
60. Zavaleta E. 2000. Valuing ecosystem services lost to Tamarix invasion in the United States. - In: Mooney H. A. and Hobbs R. J. (eds), Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, pp. 261-300.