-
1
-
-
0001839754
-
-
Harlow L. L.Mulaik S. A.Steiger J. H., ed., Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
-
Abelson R. P.What if there were no significance tests?. Harlow L. L.Mulaik S. A.Steiger J. H., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1997:117-141.
-
(1997)
What If There were No Significance Tests?
, pp. 117-141
-
-
Abelson, R.P.1
-
2
-
-
0003505498
-
-
2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.;, Washington, DC: Author
-
Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. 2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Washington, DC: Author; 2001:.
-
(2001)
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association
-
-
-
3
-
-
0003505498
-
-
2009). Washington, DC: Author
-
Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. 2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Washington, DC: Author; 2009:.
-
(2009)
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association
-
-
-
4
-
-
30544447613
-
Researchers misunderstand confidence intervals and standard error bars
-
Belia S.,Fidler F.,Williams J.,Cumming G.Researchers misunderstand confidence intervals and standard error bars.Psychological Methods. 2005;10:389-396.
-
(2005)
Psychological Methods
, vol.10
, pp. 389-396
-
-
Belia, S.1
Fidler, F.2
Williams, J.3
Cumming, G.4
-
5
-
-
84946647285
-
Some difficulties of interpretation encountered in the application of the chi-square test
-
Berkson J.Some difficulties of interpretation encountered in the application of the chi-square test.Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1938;33:526-536.
-
(1938)
Journal of the American Statistical Association
, vol.33
, pp. 526-536
-
-
Berkson, J.1
-
6
-
-
0001064264
-
Mathematical versus scientific significance
-
Boring E. G.Mathematical versus scientific significance.Psychological Bulletin. 1919;16:335-338.
-
(1919)
Psychological Bulletin
, vol.16
, pp. 335-338
-
-
Boring, E.G.1
-
8
-
-
0031829312
-
A précis of "Statistical significance: Rationale, validity and utility"
-
Chow S. L.A précis of "Statistical significance: Rationale, validity and utility.".Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1998;21:169-194.
-
(1998)
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
, vol.21
, pp. 169-194
-
-
Chow, S.L.1
-
10
-
-
0039802908
-
The earth is round (p < .05)
-
Cohen J.The earth is round (p < .05).American Psychologist. 1994;49:997-1003.
-
(1994)
American Psychologist
, vol.49
, pp. 997-1003
-
-
Cohen, J.1
-
11
-
-
0000358366
-
On the logic and purpose of significance testing
-
Cortina J. M.,Dunlap W. P.On the logic and purpose of significance testing.Psychological Methods. 1997;2:161-172.
-
(1997)
Psychological Methods
, vol.2
, pp. 161-172
-
-
Cortina, J.M.1
Dunlap, W.P.2
-
12
-
-
83555178803
-
Confidence intervals permit, but do not guarantee, better inference than statistical significance testing
-
Retrieved from
-
CoulsonM.HealeyM.FidlerF.CummingG. (2010). Confidence intervals permit, but do not guarantee, better inference than statistical significance testing. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 26. Retrieved from http://www.frontiersin.org/quantitative_psychology_and_measurement/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00026/abstract.
-
(2010)
Frontiers in Psychology
, vol.1
, pp. 26
-
-
Coulson, M.1
Healey, M.2
Fidler, F.3
Cumming, G.4
-
13
-
-
84993734294
-
Replication and p intervals: p values predict the future only vaguely, but confidence intervals do much better
-
Cumming G.Replication and p intervals: p values predict the future only vaguely, but confidence intervals do much better.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2008;3:286-200.
-
(2008)
Perspectives on Psychological Science
, vol.3
, pp. 286-200
-
-
Cumming, G.1
-
14
-
-
67649550108
-
Confidence intervals: Better answers to better questions
-
Cumming G.,Fidler F.Confidence intervals: Better answers to better questions.Journal of Psychology. 2009;217:15-26.
-
(2009)
Journal of Psychology
, vol.217
, pp. 15-26
-
-
Cumming, G.1
Fidler, F.2
-
15
-
-
34247129800
-
Statistical reform in psychology: Is anything changing?
-
Cumming G.,Fidler F.,Leonard M.,Kalinowski P.,Christiansen A.,Kleinig A.,. . Wilson S.Statistical reform in psychology: Is anything changing?.Psychological Science. 2007;18:230-232.
-
(2007)
Psychological Science
, vol.18
, pp. 230-232
-
-
Cumming, G.1
Fidler, F.2
Leonard, M.3
Kalinowski, P.4
Christiansen, A.5
Kleinig, A.6
Wilson, S.7
-
16
-
-
14844300794
-
Inference by eye: Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data
-
Cumming G.,Finch S.Inference by eye: Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data.American Psychologist. 2005;60:170-180.
-
(2005)
American Psychologist
, vol.60
, pp. 170-180
-
-
Cumming, G.1
Finch, S.2
-
17
-
-
13544271270
-
Replication and researchers' understanding of confidence intervals and standard error bars
-
Cumming G.,Williams J.,Fidler F.Replication and researchers' understanding of confidence intervals and standard error bars.Understanding Statistics. 2004;3:299-311.
-
(2004)
Understanding Statistics
, vol.3
, pp. 299-311
-
-
Cumming, G.1
Williams, J.2
Fidler, F.3
-
18
-
-
0000854691
-
Why scientists value p values
-
Dixon P.Why scientists value p values.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1998;5:390-396.
-
(1998)
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
, vol.5
, pp. 390-396
-
-
Dixon, P.1
-
19
-
-
67649515771
-
Why figures with error bars should replace p values: Some conceptual arguments and empirical demonstrations
-
Fidler F.,Loftus G. R.Why figures with error bars should replace p values: Some conceptual arguments and empirical demonstrations.Journal of Psychology. 2009;217:27-37.
-
(2009)
Journal of Psychology
, vol.217
, pp. 27-37
-
-
Fidler, F.1
Loftus, G.R.2
-
20
-
-
1642296555
-
Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals, but can't make them think: Statistical reform lessons from medicine
-
Fidler F.,Thomason N.,Cumming G.,Finch S.,Leeman J.Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals, but can't make them think: Statistical reform lessons from medicine.Psychological Science. 2004;12:119-126.
-
(2004)
Psychological Science
, vol.12
, pp. 119-126
-
-
Fidler, F.1
Thomason, N.2
Cumming, G.3
Finch, S.4
Leeman, J.5
-
21
-
-
0032396987
-
Surrogates for theories
-
Gigerenzer G.Surrogates for theories.Theory & Psychology. 1998;8:195-204.
-
(1998)
Theory & Psychology
, vol.8
, pp. 195-204
-
-
Gigerenzer, G.1
-
22
-
-
0347351016
-
Significance tests have their place
-
Harris R. J.Significance tests have their place.Psychological Science. 1997;8:8-11.
-
(1997)
Psychological Science
, vol.8
, pp. 8-11
-
-
Harris, R.J.1
-
26
-
-
77954029057
-
What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis
-
Kruschke J. K.What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2010;14:293-300.
-
(2010)
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
, vol.14
, pp. 293-300
-
-
Kruschke, J.K.1
-
27
-
-
84948101990
-
Subjective p intervals: Researchers underestimate the variability of p values over replication
-
Lai J.,Fidler F.,Cumming G.Subjective p intervals: Researchers underestimate the variability of p values over replication.Methodology. :.
-
Methodology
-
-
Lai, J.1
Fidler, F.2
Cumming, G.3
-
28
-
-
0017816556
-
Theoretical risks and tabular asterisk: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology
-
Meehl P. E.Theoretical risks and tabular asterisk: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1978;46:806-834.
-
(1978)
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
, vol.46
, pp. 806-834
-
-
Meehl, P.E.1
-
29
-
-
74849092982
-
What is the probability of replicating a statistically significant effect?
-
Miller J.What is the probability of replicating a statistically significant effect?.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2009;16:617-640.
-
(2009)
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
, vol.16
, pp. 617-640
-
-
Miller, J.1
-
30
-
-
0004786871
-
-
Harlow L. L.Mulaik S. A.Steiger J. H., ed., Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
-
Mulaik S.,Raju N.,Harshman R.What if there were no significance tests?. Harlow L. L.Mulaik S. A.Steiger J. H., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1997:65-115.
-
(1997)
What If There were No Significance Tests?
, pp. 65-115
-
-
Mulaik, S.1
Raju, N.2
Harshman, R.3
-
31
-
-
0000426690
-
Interpretation of significance levels and effect sizes by psychological researchers
-
Nelson N.,Rosenthal R.,Rosnow R. L.Interpretation of significance levels and effect sizes by psychological researchers.American Psychologist. 1986;41:1299-1301.
-
(1986)
American Psychologist
, vol.41
, pp. 1299-1301
-
-
Nelson, N.1
Rosenthal, R.2
Rosnow, R.L.3
-
33
-
-
0035751897
-
Interpretation of significance levels by psychological researchers: The .05 cliff effect may be overstated
-
Poitevineau J.,Lecoutre B.Interpretation of significance levels by psychological researchers: The .05 cliff effect may be overstated.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2001;8:847-850.
-
(2001)
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
, vol.8
, pp. 847-850
-
-
Poitevineau, J.1
Lecoutre, B.2
-
34
-
-
0002718625
-
The interpretation of levels of significance by psychological researchers
-
Rosenthal R.,Gaito J.The interpretation of levels of significance by psychological researchers.Journal of Psychology. 1963;55:33-38.
-
(1963)
Journal of Psychology
, vol.55
, pp. 33-38
-
-
Rosenthal, R.1
Gaito, J.2
-
35
-
-
12944305674
-
Relational and arelational confidence intervals: A comment on Fidler, Thomason, Cumming, Finch, and Leeman (2004)
-
Rouder J. N.,Morey R. D.Relational and arelational confidence intervals: A comment on Fidler, Thomason, Cumming, Finch, and Leeman (2004).Psychological Science. 2005;16:77-79.
-
(2005)
Psychological Science
, vol.16
, pp. 77-79
-
-
Rouder, J.N.1
Morey, R.D.2
-
36
-
-
0000724985
-
Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers
-
Schmidt F. L.Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers.Psychological Methods. 1996;1:115-129.
-
(1996)
Psychological Methods
, vol.1
, pp. 115-129
-
-
Schmidt, F.L.1
-
38
-
-
0035751681
-
Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: An integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests
-
Tryon W. W.Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: An integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests.Psychological Methods. 2001;6:371-386.
-
(2001)
Psychological Methods
, vol.6
, pp. 371-386
-
-
Tryon, W.W.1
-
39
-
-
0001653457
-
Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations
-
Wilkinson L.Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.American Psychologist. 1999;54:594-604.
-
(1999)
American Psychologist
, vol.54
, pp. 594-604
-
-
Wilkinson, L.1
|