Resilience of science teaching philosophies and practice in early career primary teaching graduates

Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 103-112

  Bartholomew, Rex ^a   Anderson, Dayle ^a   Moeed, Azra ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Fun; Hands on science; Interest; Kindergarten education; Learning; Motivation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867683080     PISSN: 13058215     EISSN: 13058223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2012.824a     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Appleton, K. (2006). Science pedagogical content knowledge and elementary school teachers. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice (pp. 31-54). Mahwah, NJ: Association for Science Teachers and Laurence Erlbaum.
2. Bull, A., Gilbert, J., Barwick, H., Hipkins, R., & Baker, R. (2010). Inspired by science. A paper commissioned by the Royal Society and the Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor. Wellington. New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
3. Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263-272.
4. Conner, L. (2008). Teacher Education for the Future Project: Special issue. Pacific Asian Education, 20(1), 4-7.
5. Conner, L. (2009). Initial teacher education programmes in transition: Tensions and possibilities. Curriculum Matters, 5, 121-137.
6. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.) (2005). Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and be Able to Do: Jossey-Bass.
7. Education Review Office. (2002). Science now: Science education for students in years 1 to 8. Wellington: Education Review Office.
8. Education Review Office. (2004). The quality of teaching in years 4 and 8: Science. Retrieved from http://www.ero.govt.nz/ERO/Publishing.nsf/Print/The%20Quality%20of%20Teaching%20in%20Years%204%20and%208:%20Science
9. Glaesser, J., Gott, R., & Roberts, R. (2009). The roles of substantive and procedural understanding in openended science investigations: using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to compare two different tasks. Research in Science Education, 39, 595-624.
10. Gluckman, P. (2011). Looking ahead: Science education for the twenty-first century. A report to the Prime Minister from the Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor. Office of the Prime Minister's Science Advisory Committee. Auckland
11. Gott, R., & Roberts, R. (2008). Concepts of evidence and their role in open-ended practical investigations and scientific literacy; background to published papers. The School of Education, 1990). Durham University.
12. Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. London: Sage.
13. Grossman, P. L. (The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Harlen, W. (1999). Effective teaching of science: A review of research. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
15. Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education. 45(2), 169-204.
16. Lewthwaite, B. (2000). Implementing science in the New Zealand curriculum: How teachers see the problems. In G. Haisman (Ed.), Exploring issues in science education: Papers from a research seminar on science education in primary schools (pp. 11-22). Wellington: Ministry of Education.
17. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
18. McGee,C., Jones, A., Cowie, B., Hill, M., Miller, T., Harlow, A., & Mackenzie, K. (2003). Curriculum stocktake: National school sampling study. Teachers' experiences in curriculum implementation: English, languages, science and social studies. Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/curriculum/5827.
19. Ministry of Education. (1993). Science in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
20. Ministry of Education. (2007). New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
21. Ministry of Education. (2009a). Mathematics Standards for years 1-8. Wellington: Learning Media.
22. Ministry of Education. (2009b). Reading and Writing Standards for years 1-8. Wellington: Learning Media.
23. Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (1996). Primary science: Past and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 27, 99-147.
24. Osborne, J., Ratcliffe, M., Collins, S., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What "ideas-about-science"should be Taught in school science? A Delphi Study of the Expert Community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720.
25. Ratcliffe, M., & Millar, R. (2009). Teaching for understanding of science in context: Evidence from the pilot trials of the Twenty First Century Science courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 945-959.
26. Roberts, R. (2004). Using different types of practical within a problem-solving model of science. School Science Review, 85 (312), 113-119.
27. Roberts, R. (2009). Can teaching about evidence encourage a creative approach in open-ended investigations? School Science Review, (332), 31-38.
28. Roberts, R., Gott, R., & Glaesser, J. (2009). Students' approaches to open-ended science investigation: the importance of substantive and procedural understanding. Research Papers in Education, (iFirst Article), 1-31.
29. Russell, T., Qualter, A., & McGuin, L. (1995). Reflections on the implementation of national curriculum science policy for the 5-14 age range: Findings and interpretations from a national evaluation study in England. International Journal of Science Education 17(4), 481-92.
30. Sharp, J., Hopkin, R., James, S., Peacock, G., Kelly, L., Davies, D. & Bowker, R. (2009). Teacher preparation and the national primary science curriculum: a twentieth-anniversary perspective. Research Papers in Education, 24 (3), 247-263.
31. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
32. Tobin, K. G. (1993). The Practice of constructivism in science education (Vol. Volume 1993, Part 2): Routledge
33. Tolley, A. (2009). National standards to benefit children and parents. Retrieved from http://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/national-standards-benefit-children-and-parents