Direct and indirect transgenerational effects alter plant-herbivore interactions

Evolutionary Ecology

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1469-1480

  terHorst, Casey P ^a   Lau, Jennifer A ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diffuse evolution; Invasive species; Maternal effects; Non additive interactions; Rapid evolution; Resistance

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; HERB; INVASIVE SPECIES; LEAF; LEGUME; MATERNAL EFFECT; PARENT-OFFSPRING INTERACTION; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; THEORETICAL STUDY; TRANSPLANTATION;

HEXAPODA; LOTUS WRANGELIANUS; MEDICAGO; MEDICAGO POLYMORPHA;

EID: 84867675054     PISSN: 02697653     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10682-012-9560-8     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abrams PA (1992) Predators that benefit prey and prey that harm predators: unusual effects of interacting foraging adaptation. Am Nat 140: 573-600.
2. Agrawal AA, Laforsch C, Tollrian R (1999) Transgenerational induction of defences in plants and animals. Nature 401: 60-63.
3. Bassar RD, Marshall MC, Lopez-Sepulcre A, Zondona E, Auer SK, Travis J, Pringle CM, Flecker AS, Thomas SA, Fraser DF, Reznick DN (2010) Local adaptation in Trinidadian guppies alters ecosystem processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 3616-3621.
4. 2. Glob Chang Biol 4: 687-691.
5. Conner JK (2003) Artificial selection: a powerful tool for ecologists. Ecology 84: 1650-1660.
6. de Haan RL, Barnes DK (1998) Inheritance of pod type, stem color, and dwarf growth habit in Medicago polymorpha. Crop Sci 38: 1558-1561.
7. Ellner SP, Geber MA, Hairston NG (2011) Does rapid evolution matter? Measuring the rate of contemporary evolution and its impacts on ecological dynamics. Ecol Lett 14: 603-614.
8. 2 environment on seed quality and subsequent seedling performance in Bromus rubens. Oecologia 114: 202-208.
9. 2 and offspring nutrient environment on initial growth and photosynthesis in an annual grass. Int J Plant Sci 162: 617-623.
10. Irwin RE (2006) The consequences of direct versus indirect species interactions to selection on traits: pollination and nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata. Am Nat 167: 315-328.
11. Janzen DH (1980) When is it coevolution? Evolution 34: 611-612.
12. Johnson MTJ, Stinchcombe JR (2007) An emerging synthesis between community ecology and evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 250-257.
13. Lau JA (2008) Beyond the ecological: biological invasions alter natural selection on a native plant species. Ecology 89: 1023-1031.
14. Lau JA, Strauss SY (2005) Insect herbivores drive important indirect effects of exotic plants on native communities. Ecology 86: 2990-2997.
15. 2. Oecologia 158: 141-150.
16. Meyer JR, Ellner SP, Hairston NG, Jones LE, Yoshida T (2006) Prey evolution on the time-scale of predator-prey dynamics revealed by allele-specific quantitative PCR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 10690-10695.
17. Miller TE (1994) Direct and indirect species interactions in an early old-field plant community. Am Nat 143: 1007-1025.
18. Miller TE, terHorst C (forthcoming) Indirect effects in communities and ecosystems. In: Gibson D (ed) Oxford Bibliographies Online: Ecology. Oxford University Press, New York.
19. Miller TE, Travis J (1996) The evolutionary role of indirect effects in communities. Ecology 77: 1329-1335.
20. Platenkamp GAJ, Shaw RG (1993) Environmental and genetic maternal effects on seed characters in Nemophila menziesii. Evolution 47: 540-555.
21. Reale D, McAdam AG, Boutin S, Berteaux D (2003) Genetic and plastic responses of a northern mammal to climate change. Proc R Soc Lond B 270: 591-596.
22. Roach DA, Wulff RD (1987) Maternal effects in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18: 209-235.
23. Rossiter MC (1996) Incidence and consequences of inherited environmental effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27: 451-476.
24. Schoener TW (2011) The newest synthesis: understanding the interplay of evolutionary and ecological dynamics. Science 331: 426-429.
25. Slobodkin LB (1961) Growth and regulation of animal populations. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.
26. Stone L, Roberts A (1991) Conditions for a species to gain advantage from the presence of competitors. Ecology 72: 1964-1972.
27. Strauss SY, Irwin RE (2004) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant-animal interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35: 435-466.
28. Strauss SY, Lau JA, Schoener TW, Tiffin P (2008) Evolution in ecological field experiments: implications for effect size. Ecol Lett 11: 199-207.
29. terHorst CP (2010) Evolution in response to direct and indirect ecological effects in pitcher plant inquiline communities. Am Nat 176: 675-685.
30. terHorst CP (2011) Experimental evolution of protozoan traits in response to interspecific competition. J Evol Biol 24: 36-46.
31. terHorst CP, Miller TE, Levitan DR (2010) Evolution of prey in ecological time reduces the effect size of predators in experimental microcosms. Ecology 91: 629-636.
32. Thompson JN (1998) Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends Ecol Evol 13: 329-332.
33. Walsh MR, Reznick DN (2010) Influence of the indirect effects of guppies on life-history evolution in Rivulus hartii. Evolution 64: 1583-1593.
34. Wootton JT (1994) The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 25: 443-466.
35. Yoshida T, Jones LE, Ellner SP, Fussmann GF, Hairston NG (2003) Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator-prey system. Nature 424: 303-306.
36. Yoshida T, Ellner SP, Jones LE, Bohannan BJM, Lenski RE, Hairston NG (2007) Cryptic population dynamics: rapid evolution masks trophic interactions. PLoS Biol 5: 1868-1879.
37. Youngson NA, Whitelaw E (2008) Transgenerational epigenetic effects. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 9: 233-257.