Dual-aspect monism à la Pauli and Jung

Journal of Consciousness Studies

Volumn 19, Issue 9-10, 2012, Pages 96-120

  Atmanspacher, Harald ^a,b  

^a Institute for Frontier Areas of Psychology   (Germany)

^b Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Collegium Helveticum   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867667977     PISSN: 13558250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Aerts, D., Durt, T., Grib, A., Van Bogaert, B. & Zapatrin, A. (1993) Quantum structures in macroscopical reality, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 32, pp. 489-498.
2. Aerts, D. & Aerts, S. (1994) Applications of quantum statistics in psychological studies of decision processes, Foundations of Science, 1, pp. 85-97.
3. Aspect, A., Dalibard, J. &Roger, G. (1982) Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using time-varying analyzers, Physical Review Letters, 49, pp. 1804-1807.
4. Atmanspacher, H. (2011) Quantum approaches to consciousness, in Zalta, E.N. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, [Online], http://plato.stanford.edu/ entries/qt-consciousness/
5. Atmanspacher, H., Primas, H. & Wertenschlag-Birkhäuser, E. (eds.) (1995) Der Pauli-Jung-Dialog und seine Bedeutung für die moderne Wissenschaft, Berlin: Springer.
6. Atmanspacher, H. & Kronz, F. (1999) Relative onticity, in Atmanspacher, H., Amann, A. & Müller-Herold, U. (eds.) On Quanta, Mind, and Matter: Hans Primas in Context, pp. 273-294, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
7. Atmanspacher, H., Römer, H. & Walach, H. (2002) Weak quantum theory: Complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond, Foundations of Physics, 32, pp. 379-406.
8. Atmanspacher, H. & Primas, H. (2003) Epistemic and ontic quantum realities, in Castell, L. & Ischebeck, O. (eds.) Time, Quantum, and Information, pp. 301-321, Berlin: Springer.
9. Atmanspacher, H., Filk, T. & Römer, H. (2004) Quantum Zeno features of bistable perception, Biological Cybernetics, 90, pp. 33-40.
10. Atmanspacher, H., Filk, T. & Römer, H. (2006) Weak quantum theory: Formal framework and selected applications, in Adenier, G., Khrennikov, A. & Nieuwenhuizen, T.M. (eds.) Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations-3, pp. 34-46, New York: American Institute of Physics.
11. Atmanspacher, H. & Primas, H. (2006) Pauli's ideas on mind and matter in the context of contemporary science, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 13 (3), pp. 5-50.
12. Atmanspacher, H. & beim Graben, P. (2007) Contextual emergence of mental states from neurodynamics, Chaos and Complexity Letters, 2, pp. 151-168.
13. Atmanspacher, H. &Primas, H. (eds.) (2009) Recasting Reality, Berlin: Springer.
14. Atmanspacher, H. & Filk, T. (2010) A proposed test of temporal nonlocality in bistable perception, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, pp. 314-321.
15. Bell, J.S. (1964) On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox, Physics, 1, pp. 195-200.
16. Bernays, P. (1948) Über die Ausdehnung des Begriffes der Komplementarität auf die Philosophie, Synthese, VII, pp. 66-70.
17. Bitbol, M. (1998) L'Aveuglante proximité du Réel, Paris: Flammarion.
18. Bohm, D. (1980) Wholeness and the Implicate Order, London: Routledge.
19. Bohm, D. (1990) Anew theory of the relationship of mind and matter, Philosophical Psychology, 3, pp. 271-286.
20. Bohm, D. & Hiley, B. (1993) The Undivided Universe, London: Routledge.
21. Bohr, N. (1928) The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory, Nature (Supplement), 121, pp. 580-590.
22. Bohr, N. (1935) Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Physical Review, 48, pp. 696-702.
23. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. (1935) Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Physical Review, 47, pp. 777-780.
24. d'Espagnat, B. (1999) Concepts of reality: Primas' nonstandard realism, in Atmanspacher, H., Amann, A. & Müller-Herold, U. (eds.) On Quanta, Mind, and Matter: Hans Primas in Context, pp. 249-272, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
25. d'Espagnat, B. (2006) On Physics and Philosophy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Fach, W. (2011) Phenomenological aspects of complementarity and entanglement in exceptional human experiences, Axiomathes, 21, pp. 233-247.
27. Favrholdt, D. (1999) Niels Bohr Collected Works. Volume 10: Complementarity Beyond Physics (1928-1962), Amsterdam: Elsevier.
28. Fell, J. (2004) Identifying neural correlates of consciousness: The state space approach, Consciousness and Cognition, 13, pp. 709-729.
29. Filk, T. & von Müller, A. (2007) Quantum physics and consciousness: The quest for a common conceptual foundation, Mind and Matter, 7, pp. 59-80.
30. beim Graben, P. & Atmanspacher, H. (2009) Extending the philosophical significance of the idea of complementarity, in Atmanspacher, H. & Primas, H. (eds.) Recasting Reality, pp. 99-113, Berlin: Springer.
31. Heisenberg, W. (1936) Prinzipielle Fragen der modernen Physik, in Neuere Fortschritte in den exakten Wissenschaften, pp. 91-102, Leipzig: Franz Deuticke.
32. Hepp, K. (1990) On Listing's Law, Communications in Mathematical Physics, 132, pp. 285-292.
33. Hiley, B. (2001) Non-commutative geometry, the Bohm interpretation and the mind-matter relationship, in Dubois, D. (ed.) Computing Anticipatory Systems-CASYS 2000, pp. 77-88, Berlin: Springer.
34. Hiley, B. & Pylkkänen, P. (1996) Representation and interpretation in quantum physics, in Peterson, D.M. (ed.) Alternative Representations, pp. 180-197, Exeter: Intellect Books.
35. James, W. (1890) The Principles of Psychology, Volume One, New York: Holt.
36. Jammer, M. (1974) The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, New York: Wiley.
37. Jung, C.G. (1969) On the nature of the psyche, in The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche: CollectedWorks, Vol. 8, pp. 159-236, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Jung, C.G. (1970) Mysterium Coniunctionis, in Collected Works, Vol. 14, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Jung, C.G. & Pauli, W. (1952) Naturerklärung und Psyche, Zürich: Rascher.
40. Kalckar, J. (1985) Niels Bohr Collected Works. Volume 6: Foundations of Quantum Physics I (1926-1932), Amsterdam: North-Holland.
41. Kalckar, J. (1996) Niels Bohr Collected Works. Volume 7: Foundations of Quantum Physics II (1933-1958), Amsterdam: Elsevier.
42. Kapur, S. (2003) Psychosis as a state of abherrant salience: A framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia, American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, pp. 13-23.
43. Kelly, E.W. (2007) Psychophysiological influence, in Kelly, E.F., Kelly, E.W. et al. (eds.) Irreducible Mind, pp. 117-239, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
44. Meier, C.A. (1975) Psychosomatik in Jungscher Sicht, inMeier, C.A. (ed.) Experiment und Symbol, pp. 138-156, Olten: Walter.
45. Meier, C.A. (ed.) (1992) Wolfgang Pauli und C.G. Jung. Ein Briefwechsel 1932-1958, Berlin: Springer.
46. Meyenn, K. von (ed.) (1985) Wolfgang Pauli. Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel, Band II: 1930-1939, Berlin: Springer.
47. Meyenn, K. von (ed.) (1993) Wolfgang Pauli. Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel, Band III: 1940-1949, Berlin: Springer.
48. Meyenn, K. von (ed.) (1996) Wolfgang Pauli. Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel, Band IV, Teil I: 1950-1952, Berlin: Springer.
49. Meyenn, K. von (ed.) (1999) Wolfgang Pauli. Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel, Band IV, Teil II: 1953-1954, Berlin: Springer.
50. Meyenn, K. von (ed.) (2001) Wolfgang Pauli. Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel, Band IV, Teil III: 1955-1956, Berlin: Springer.
51. Pauli, W. (1948) Moderne Beispiele zur Hintergrundsphysik, in Meier, C.A. (ed.) Wolfgang Pauli und C.G. Jung. Ein Briefwechsel, pp. 176-192, Berlin: Springer.
52. Pauli, W. (1950) Die philosophische Bedeutung der Idee der Komplementarität, Experientia, 6, pp. 72-81.
53. English translation in Enz, C.P. & von Meyenn, K. (eds.) (1994) Wolfgang Pauli: Writings on Physics and Philosophy, pp. 35-42, Berlin: Springer.
54. Pauli, W. (1952) Der Einfluss archetypischer Vorstellungen auf die Bildung naturwissenschaftlicher Theorien bei Kepler, in Jung, C.G. & Pauli, W. (eds.) Naturerklärung und Psyche, pp. 109-194, Zürich: Rascher.
55. Pauli, W. (1957) Phänomen und physikalische Realität, Dialectica, 11, pp. 36-48.
56. English translation in Enz, C.P. & von Meyenn, K. (eds.) (1994) Wolfgang Pauli: Writings on Physics and Philosophy, pp. 127-135, Berlin: Springer.
57. Primas, H. (2003) Time-entanglement between mind and matter, Mind and Matter, 1, pp. 81-119.
58. Primas, H. (2007) Non-Boolean descriptions of mind-matter systems, Mind and Matter, 5, pp. 7-44.
59. Primas, H. (2009) Complementarity of mind and matter, in Atmanspacher, H. & Primas, H. (eds.) Recasting Reality, pp. 171-209, Berlin: Springer.
60. Putnam, H. (1987) The Many Faces of Realism, LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
61. Pylkkänen, P. (2007) Mind, Matter, and the Implicate Order, section 3, Berlin: Springer.
62. Quine, W, V.O. (1969) Ontological relativity, in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, pp. 26-68. New York: Columbia University Press.
63. Roesler, C. (2010) Analytische Psychologie heute, Freiburg: Karger.
64. Russell, B. (1921) The Analysis of Mind, London: George Allen & Unwin.
65. Russell, B. (1948) Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits, London: George Allen & Unwin.
66. Scheibe, E. (1973) The Logical Analysis of Quantum Mechanics, pp. 82-88, Oxford: Pergamon.
67. Seager, W. (2009) A new idea of reality: Pauli on the unity of mind and matter, in Atmanspacher, H. & Primas, H. (eds.) Recasting Reality, pp. 83-97, Berlin: Springer.
68. Silberstein, M. (2009) Why neutral monism is superior to panpsychism, Mind and Matter, 7, pp. 239-248.
69. Stubenberg, L. (2010) Neutral monism, in Zalta, E.N. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, [Online], http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/neutral-monism/
70. van Gelder, T. (1998) The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, pp. 615-661.
71. van Os, J. (2009) A salience dysregulation syndrome, British Journal of Psychiatry, 194, pp. 101-103.
72. Velmans, M. (1991) Consciousness from a first person perspective, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, pp. 702-726.
73. Velmans, M. (2009a) Understanding Consciousness, second edition, London: Routledge/Psychology Press.
74. Velmans, M. (2009b) Psychophysical nature, in Atmanspacher, H. & Primas, H. (eds.) Recasting Reality, pp. 115-134, Berlin: Springer.
75. Velmans, M. (2012) Reflexive monism: Psychophysical relations between mind, matter, and consciousness, Journal of Consciousness Studies. 19 (9-10).
76. Zwirn, H. (2000) Les Limits de la Conaissance, Paris: Odile Jacob.