Design-of-experiment strategy for the formulation of laccase biocatalysts and their application to degrade bisphenol A

New Biotechnology

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 96-103

  Demarche, Philippe ^a   Junghanns, Charles ^a   Mazy, Nicolas ^a   Agathos, Spiros N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A; CONTINUOUS PROCESS; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL BIOTECHNOLOGY; GLUTARALDEHYDES; HYDRAULIC RESIDENCE TIME; IMMOBILIZATION CONDITIONS; IMMOBILIZATION PARAMETERS; IMMOBILIZED BIOCATALYSTS; IMMOBILIZING ENZYMES; INDUSTRIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY; LACCASES; MEMBRANE REACTOR; MESOPOROUS SILICA PARTICLES; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSIONS; OPTIMIZED CONDITIONS; PROCESS INTENSIFICATION; PROCESSING TIME; REACTOR VOLUME; RESIDUAL ACTIVITY; STRATEGIC INTEREST; WORKING VOLUME;

ADSORPTION; ALDEHYDES; BIOREACTORS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; ENZYMES; OPTIMIZATION;

BIOCATALYSTS;

4,4' ISOPROPYLIDENEDIPHENOL; LACCASE;

ARTICLE; BIOCATALYSIS; CORIOLOPSIS POLYZONA; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME IMMOBILIZATION; ENZYME STABILITY; FUNGUS; MEMBRANE REACTOR; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

BENZHYDRYL COMPOUNDS; BIOCATALYSIS; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOREACTORS; ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION; ENZYMES, IMMOBILIZED; LACCASE; LINEAR MODELS; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; PHENOLS; POROSITY; SILICON DIOXIDE;

CORIOLOPSIS POLYZONA;

EID: 84867650169     PISSN: 18716784     EISSN: 18764347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2012.05.023     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Cao L., et al. Immobilised enzymes: carrier-bound or carrier-free?. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2003, 14:387-394.
2. Tufvesson P.R., et al. Guidelines and cost analysis for catalyst production in biocatalytic processes. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2010, 15:266-274.
3. Torres-Salas P., et al. Immobilized biocatalysts: novel approaches and tools for binding enzymes to supports. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23:5275-5282.
4. Baş D., Boyaci{dotless} İ.H. Modeling and optimization. I. Usability of response surface methodology. J. Food Eng. 2007, 78:836-845.
5. Yasin Y. Optimization of immobilization conditions of Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase on olive pomace powder using response surface methodology. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2012, 1:39-44.
6. Aybastier O., Demir C. Optimization of immobilization conditions of Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase on styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer using response surface methodology. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2010, 63:170-178.
7. Chang S.W., et al. Studies of optimum conditions for covalent immobilization of Candida rugosa lipase on poly(γ-glutamic acid) by RSM. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:2800-2805.
8. Ebrahimi B., et al. Optimization and evaluation of acetylcholine esterase immobilization on ceramic packing using response surface methodology. Process Biochem. 2010, 45:81-87.
9. Hung Y.-J., et al. Immobilization of Neocallimastix patriciarum xylanase on artificial oil bodies and statistical optimization of enzyme activity. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:8662-8666.
10. Dwevedi A., Kayastha A.M. Optimal immobilization of β-galactosidase from Pea (PsBGAL) onto Sephadex and chitosan beads using response surface methodology and its applications. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:2667-2675.
11. Demarche, P. et al. Harnessing the power of enzymes for environmental stewardship. Biotechnol. Adv. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.05.013.
12. Kolpin D.W., et al. Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999-2000: a national reconnaissance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:1202-1211.
13. Cabana H., et al. Elimination of endocrine disrupting chemicals nonylphenol and bisphenol A and personal care product ingredient triclosan using enzyme preparation from the white rot fungus Coriolopsis polyzona. Chemosphere 2007, 67:770-778.
14. McIlvaine T.C. A buffer solution for colorimetric comparison. J. Biol. Chem. 1921, 49:183-186.
15. Junghanns C., et al. Biochemical and molecular genetic characterisation of a novel laccase produced by the aquatic ascomycete Phoma sp. UHH 5-1-03. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84:1095-1105.
16. Xu F., et al. A study of a series of recombinant fungal laccases and bilirubin oxidase that exhibit significant differences in redox potential, substrate specificity, and stability. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Protein Struct. Mol. Enzymol. 1996, 1292:303-311.
17. Ispas C., et al. Enzyme-functionalized mesoporous silica for bioanalytical applications. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 393:543-554.
18. Taboada-Puig R., et al. Combined cross-linked enzyme aggregates from versatile peroxidase and glucose oxidase: production, partial characterization and application for the elimination of endocrine disruptors. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:6593-6599.
19. Johannes C., Majcherczyk A. Laccase activity tests and laccase inhibitors. J. Biotechnol. 2000, 78:193-199.
20. Cabana H., et al. Immobilization of laccase from the white rot fungus Coriolopsis polyzona and use of the immobilized biocatalyst for the continuous elimination of endocrine disrupting chemicals. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:3447-3458.
21. Robles A., et al. Characterisation of laccase activity produced by the hyphomycete Chalara (syn, Thielaviopsis) paradoxa CH32. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2002, 31:516-522.
22. López-Gallego F., et al. Enzyme stabilization by glutaraldehyde crosslinking of adsorbed proteins on aminated supports. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 119:70-75.
23. Cao L. Carrier-bound Immobilized Enzymes: Principles, Applications and Design 2005, Wiley-VCH.
24. Brash J.L., Horbett T.A. Proteins at interfaces: an overview. Proteins at Interfaces II, ACS Symposium Series 1995, Vol. 602. American Chemical Society, pp. 1-23.
25. Kondo A., Urabe T. Relationship between molecular states (conformation and orientation) and activities of α-amylase adsorbed on ultrafine silica particles. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1995, 43:801-807.
26. Singh Arora D., Kumar Sharma R. Ligninolytic fungal laccases and their biotechnological applications. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 160:1760-1788.
27. Xu F. Oxidation of phenols, anilines, and benzenethiols by fungal laccases: correlation between activity and redox potentials as well as halide inhibition. Biochemistry 1996, 35:7608-7614.
28. Trovaslet M., et al. Potential of a Pycnoporus sanguineus laccase in bioremediation of wastewater and kinetic activation in the presence of an anthraquinonic acid dye. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007, 41:368-376.
29. Migneault I., et al. Glutaraldehyde: behavior in aqueous solution, reaction with proteins, and application to enzyme crosslinking. Biotechniques 2004, 37:790-796. 798-802.
30. Monsan P. Optimization of glutaraldehyde activation of a support for enzyme immobilization. J. Mol. Catal. 1978, 3:371-384.
31. Hommes G., et al. Production of a robust nanobiocatalyst for municipal wastewater treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 115:8-15.
32. Zimmermann Y.-S., et al. Sorption-assisted surface conjugation: a way to stabilize laccase enzyme. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 92:169-178.
33. Derringer G., Suich R. Simultaneous-optimization of several response variables. J. Qual. Technol. 1980, 12:214-219.
34. Cabana H., et al. Utilization of cross-linked laccase aggregates in a perfusion basket reactor for the continuous elimination of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 102:1582-1592.
35. Rodgers C.J., et al. Designer laccases: a vogue for high-potential fungal enzymes?. Trends Biotechnol. 2010, 28:63-72.