Soft song is a reliable signal of aggressive intent in song sparrows

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Volumn 66, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1503-1509

  Templeton, Christopher N ^a,b   Akçay, Çaǧlar ^a,c   Campbell, S Elizabeth ^a   Beecher, Michael D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^c Fuller Evolutionary Biology Program   (United States)

Author keywords

Aggression; Bird song; Honest signaling; Song sparrow; Territoriality

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; DISPLAY BEHAVIOR; HONEST SIGNALING; SONG; SONGBIRD; TERRITORIALITY; VOCALIZATION;

EID: 84867636920     PISSN: 03405443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-012-1405-5     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Akçay Ç, Tom M, Holmes D, Campbell SE, Beecher MD (2011) Sing softly and carry a big stick: Soft song as an aggressive signal in song sparrows. Anim Behav 82: 377-382.
2. Anderson RC, Nowicki S, Searcy WA (2007) Soft song in song sparrows: Response of males and females to an enigmatic signal. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61: 1267-1274.
3. Anderson RC, Searcy WA, Hughes M, Nowicki S (2012) The receiver-dependent cost of soft song: A signal of aggressive intent in songbirds. Anim Behav 83: 1443-1448.
4. Anderson RC, Searcy WA, Peters S, Nowicki S (2008) Soft song in song sparrows: Acoustic structure and implications for signal function. Ethology 114: 662-676.
5. Arcese P, Sogge MK, Marr AB, Patten MA (2002) Song sparrow (Melospiza melodia). The Birds of North America Online database: http://bna. birds. cornell. edu/bna/species/704. Accessed 14 Oct 2011.
6. Ballentine B, Searcy WA, Nowicki S (2008) Reliable aggressive signalling in swamp sparrows. Anim Behav 75: 693-703.
7. Beecher MD (2008) Function and mechanisms of song learning in song sparrows. Adv Stud Behav 38: 167-225.
8. Brumm H (2009) Song amplitude and body size in birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63: 1157-1165.
9. Brumm H, Ritschard M (2011) Song amplitude affects territorial aggression of male receivers in chaffinches. Behav Ecol 22: 310-316.
10. Brumm H, Todt D (2004) Male-male vocal interactions and the adjustment of song amplitude in a territorial bird. Anim Behav 67: 281-286.
11. Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (2008) Bird song: biological themes and variations, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD (1979) Roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement. Behaviour 69: 145-170.
13. Dabelsteen T, McGregor PK, Lampe HM, Langmore NE, Holland J (1998) Quiet song in song birds: An overlooked phenomenon. Bioacoustics 9: 89-105.
14. Dabelsteen T, Pedersen SB (1990) Song and information about aggressive responses of blackbirds, Turdus merula: Evidence from interactive playback experiments with territory owners. Anim Behav 40: 1158-1168.
15. Davies NB, Halliday TR (1978) Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo. Nature 274: 683-685.
16. Gil D, Gahr M (2002) The honesty of bird song: Multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 133-141.
17. Grafen A (1990) Biological signals as handicaps. J Theor Biol 144: 517-546.
18. Hof D, Hazlett N (2010) Low-amplitude song predicts attack in a North American wood warbler. Anim Behav 80: 821-828.
19. Krebs J, Ashcroft R, Webber M (1978) Song repertoires and territory defence in great tit. Nature 271: 539-542.
20. Lack D (1965) The life of the robin. Witherby, London.
21. Lampe HM, Balsby TJS, Espmark YO, Dabelsteen T (2010) Does twitter song amplitude signal male arousal in redwings (Turdus iliacus)? Behaviour 147: 353-365.
22. Maynard Smith J (1974) Theory of games and evolution of animal conflicts. J Theor Biol 47: 209-221.
23. Maynard Smith J (1979) Game theory and the evolution of behavior. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 205: 475-488.
24. Maynard Smith J, Harper D (2003) Animal signals. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
25. McDonald MV (1989) Function of song in Scott's seaside sparrow, Ammodramus maritimus peninsulae. Anim Behav 38: 468-485.
26. Molles LE, Vehrencamp SL (2001) Songbird cheaters pay a retaliation cost: Evidence for auditory conventional signals. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 268: 2013-2019.
27. Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC (2007) Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: A practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 82: 591-605.
28. Nice MM (1943) Studies in the life history of the song sparrow. II The behavior of the song sparrow and other passerine birds Trans Linn Soc NY 6: 1-329.
29. Nowicki S, Searcy WA, Hughes M (1998) The territory defense function of song in song sparrows: A test with the speaker occupation design. Behaviour 135: 615-628.
30. Peters S, Searcy WA, Beecher MD, Nowicki S (2000) Geographic variation in the organization of song sparrow repertoires. Auk 117: 936-942.
31. Podos J, Peters S, Rudnicky T, Marler P, Nowicki S (1992) The organization of song repertoires in song sparrows: Themes and variations. Ethology 90: 89-106.
32. Reichard DG, Rice RJ, Vanderbilt CC, Ketterson ED (2011) Deciphering information encoded in birdsong: Male songbirds with fertile mates respond most strongly to complex, low-amplitude songs used in courtship. Am Nat 178: 478-487.
33. Rek P, Osiejuk TS (2011) Nonpasserine bird produces soft calls and pays retaliation cost. Behav Ecol 22: 657-662.
34. Ritschard M, van Oers K, Naguib M, Brumm H (2012) Song amplitude of rival males modulates the territorial behaviour of great tits during the fertile period of their mates. Ethology 118: 197-202.
35. Rohwer S, Rohwer FC (1978) Status signaling in harris sparrows: Experimental deceptions achieved. Anim Behav 26: 1012-1016.
36. Searcy WA, Anderson RC, Nowicki S (2006) Bird song as a signal of aggressive intent. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60: 234-241.
37. Searcy WA, Beecher MD (2009) Song as an aggressive signal in songbirds. Anim Behav 78: 1281-1292.
38. Searcy WA, Nowicki S (2005) The evolution of animal communication: reliability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
39. Searcy WA, Podos J, Nowicki S, Peters S (1995) Discrimination of song types and variants in song sparrows. Anim Behav 49: 1219-1226.
40. Stoddard PK, Beecher MD, Willis MS (1988) Response of territorial male song sparrows to song types and variations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22: 125-130.
41. Templeton CN, Campbell SE, Beecher MD (2012) Territorial song sparrows tolerate juveniles during the early song-learning phase. Behav Ecol 23: 916-923.
42. Tibbetts EA, Dale J (2004) A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp. Nature 432: 218-222.
43. Titus RC (1998) Short-range and long-range songs: Use of two acoustically distinct song classes by dark-eyed juncos. Auk 115: 386-393.
44. Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53: 205-214.
45. Zahavi A (1977) The cost of honesty (further remarks on handicap principle). J Theor Biol 67: 603-605.