Deciphering Information Encoded in Birdsong: Male Songbirds with Fertile Mates Respond Most Strongly to Complex, Low-Amplitude Songs Used in Courtship

American Naturalist

Volumn 178, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 478-487

  Reichard, Dustin G ^a   Rice, Rebecca J ^a   Vanderbilt, Carla C ^b   Ketterson, Ellen D ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STETSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dark eyed junco; Sexual selection; Soft song; Song function; Territoriality

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC DATA; AMPLITUDE; CONSPECIFIC; COURTSHIP; MALE BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL SELECTION; SIGNAL; SONG; SONGBIRD; TERRITORIALITY;

ACOUSTICS; AGGRESSION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RECORDING; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SONGBIRD; SOUND DETECTION; TERRITORIALITY; UNITED STATES; VOCALIZATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ACOUSTICS; AGGRESSION; ANIMALS; FEMALE; MALE; PASSERIFORMES; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; TAPE RECORDING; TERRITORIALITY; VIRGINIA; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

JUNCO HYEMALIS; PASSERI;

EID: 80053251322     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/661901     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Anderson, R. C., S. Nowicki, and W. A. Searcy. 2007. Soft song in song sparrows: response of males and females to an enigmatic signal. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61:1267-1274
2. Anderson, R. C., W. A. Searcy, S. Peters, and S. Nowicki. 2008. Soft song in song sparrows: acoustic structure and implications for signal function. Ethology 114:662-676
3. Aquiloni, L., M. Buric, and F. Gherardi. 2008. Crayfish females eavesdrop on fighting males before choosing the dominant mate. Current Biology 18:R462-R463.
4. Ballentine, B., W. A. Searcy, and S. Nowicki. 2008. Reliable aggressive signalling in swamp sparrows. Animal Behaviour 75:693-703
5. Balsby, T. J. S. 2000. The function of song in whitethroats Sylvia communis. Bioacoustics 11:17-30
6. Balsby, T. J. S., and T. Dabelsteen. 2002. Female behaviour affects male courtship in whitethroats, Sylvia communis: an interactive experiment using visual and acoustic cues. Animal Behaviour 63: 251-257
7. Balsby, T. J. S. 2003. Male singing behaviour and female presence in the territory in whitethroats Sylvia communis. Acta Ethologica 5:81-88
8. Balsby, T. J. S. 2005. Simulated courtship interactions elicit neighbour intrusions in the whitethroat, Sylvia communis. Animal Behaviour 69:161-168
9. Balsby, T. J. S., T. Dabelsteen, and S. B. Pedersen. 2003. Degradation of whitethroat vocalisations: implications for song flight and communication network activities. Behaviour 140:695-719
10. Beebee, M. D. 2004. The functions of multiple singing modes: experimental tests in yellow warblers, Dendroica petechia. Animal Behaviour 67:1089-1097
11. Behr, O., and O. von Helversen. 2004. Bat serenades: complex courtship songs of the sac-winged bat (Saccopteryx bilineata). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 56:106-115
12. Birkhead, T. R., and A. P. Møller. 1992. Sperm competition in birds: evolutionary causes and consequences. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
13. Byers, B. E., and D. E. Kroodsma. 2009. Female mate choice and songbird song repertoires. Animal Behaviour 77:13-22
14. Cardoso, G. C., J. W. Atwell, E. D. Ketterson, and T. D. Price. 2009. Song types, song performance, and the use of repertoires in darkeyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). Behavioral Ecology 20:901-907
15. Collins, S. A., S. R. de Kort, J. Perez-Tris, and J. L. Telleria. 2009. Migration strategy and divergent sexual selection on bird song. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276:585-590
16. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
17. Dabelsteen, T. 2005. Public, private or anonymous? facilitating and countering eavesdropping. Pages 38-62 in P. K. McGregor, ed. Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Dabelsteen, T., and S. B. Pedersen. 1988. Song parts adapted to function both at long and short ranges may communicate information about the species to female blackbirds Turdus merula. Ornis Scandinavica 19:195-198
19. Dabelsteen, T. 1990. Song and information about aggressive responses of blackbirds, Turdus merula: evidence from interactive playback experiments with territory owners. Animal Behaviour 40:1158-1168
20. Dabelsteen, T., O. N. Larsen, and S. B. Pedersen. 1993. Habitatinduced degradation of sound signals: quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal-to-noise ratio. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93:2206-2220
21. Dabelsteen, T., P. K. McGregor, H. M. Lampe, N. E. Langmore, and J. Holland. 1998. Quiet song in song birds: an overlooked phenomenon. Bioacoustics 9:89-105
22. Doutrelant, C., and P. K. McGregor. 2000. Eavesdropping and mate choice in female fighting fish. Behaviour 137:1655-1669
23. Enstrom, D. A., E. D. Ketterson, and V. Nolan. 1997. Testosterone and mate choice in the dark-eyed junco. Animal Behaviour 54: 1135-1146
24. Fitzpatrick, M. J., and D. A. Gray. 2001. Divergence between the courtship songs of the field crickets Gryllus texensis and Gryllus rubens (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Ethology 107:1075-1085
25. Gray, D. A. 2005. Does courtship behavior contribute to species-level reproductive isolation in field crickets? Behavioral Ecology 16:201-206
26. Hof, D., and N. Hazlett. 2010. Low-amplitude song predicts attack in a North American wood warbler. Animal Behaviour 80:821-828
27. Jang, Y., A. Bockhorst, and H. C. Gerhardt. 2007. Reproductive isolation in the wood cricket Gryllus vernalis (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Ethology 113:87-96
28. Ketterson, E. D., V. Nolan, L. Wolf, and C. Ziegenfus. 1992. Testosterone and avian life histories: effects of experimentally elevated testosterone on behavior and correlates of fitness in the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis). American Naturalist 140:980-999
29. McGlothlin, J. W., J. M. Jawor, and E. D. Ketterson. 2007. Natural variation in a testosterone-mediated trade-off between mating effort and parental effort. American Naturalist 170:864-875
30. McGregor, P. K., ed. 2005. Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
31. Mennill, D. J., and L. M. Ratcliffe. 2004. Do male black-capped chickadees eavesdrop on song contests? a multi-speaker playback experiment. Behaviour 141:125-139
32. Mennill, D. J., L. M. Ratcliffe, and P. T. Boag. 2002. Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds. Science 296:873-873
33. Naguib, M., and D. Todt. 1997. Effects of dyadic vocal interactions on other conspecific receivers in nightingales. Animal Behaviour 54:1535-1543
34. Naguib, M., V. Amrhein, and H. P. Kunc. 2004. Effects of territorial intrusions on eavesdropping neighbors: communication networks in nightingales. Behavioral Ecology 15:1011-1015
35. Newman, M. M., P. J. Yeh, and T. D. Price. 2006. Reduced territorial responses in dark-eyed juncos following population establishment in a climatically mild environment. Animal Behaviour 71:893-899
36. Newman, M. M. 2008. Song variation in a recently founded population of the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis). Ethology 114:164-173
37. Nolan, V., Jr., E. D. Ketterson, D. A. Cristol, C. M. Rogers, E. D. Clotfelter, R. C. Titus, S. J. Schoech, and E. Snajdr. 2002. Darkeyed junco (Junco hyemalis). Pages 1-44 in A. Poole, ed. The birds of North America. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY.
38. Otter, K., P. K. McGregor, A. M. R. Terry, F. R. L. Burford, T. M. Peake, and T. Dabelsteen. 1999. Do female great tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? a field study using interactive song playback. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 266:1305-1309
39. Peake, T. M., G. Matessi, P. K. McGregor, and T. Dabelsteen. 2005. Song type matching, song type switching and eavesdropping in male great tits. Animal Behaviour 69:1063-1068
40. Price, T. 2008. Speciation in birds. 1st ed. Roberts, Greenwood Village, CO.
41. Rantala, M. J., and R. Kortet. 2003. Courtship song and immune function in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79:503-510
42. Rebar, D., N. W. Bailey, and M. Zuk. 2009. Courtship song's role during female mate choice in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Behavioral Ecology 20:1307-1314
43. Rek, P., and T. S. Osiejuk. 2011. Nonpasserine bird produces soft calls and pays retaliation cost. Behavioral Ecology 22:657-662
44. Robinson, D. J., and M. J. Hall. 2002. Sound signalling in Orthoptera. Pages 151-278 in P. Evans, ed. Advances in insect physiology. Vol 29. Academic Press, London.
45. Roemer, H., A. Lang, and M. Hartbauer. 2010. The signaller's dilemma: a cost-benefit analysis of public and private communication. PLoS ONE 5:e13325.
46. Searcy, W., and S. Nowicki. 2005. The evolution of animal communication: reliability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
47. Searcy, W. A., and M. Andersson. 1986. Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17: 507-533
48. Searcy, W. A., and M. D. Beecher. 2009. Song as an aggressive signal in songbirds. Animal Behaviour 78:1281-1292
49. Searcy, W. A., R. C. Anderson, and S. Nowicki. 2006. Bird song as a signal of aggressive intent. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 60:234-241
50. Stoltz, J. A., and M. C. B. Andrade. 2010. Female's courtship threshold allows intruding males to mate with reduced effort. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277:585-592
51. Temeles, E. J. 1994. The role of neighbors in territorial systems: when are they "dear enemies"? Animal Behaviour 47:339-350
52. Titus, R. C. 1998. Short-range and long-range songs: use of two acoustically distinct song classes by dark-eyed juncos. Auk 115: 386-393
53. Tregenza, T., L. W. Simmons, N. Wedell, and M. Zuk. 2006. Female preference for male courtship song and its role as a signal of immune function and condition. Animal Behaviour 72:809-818
54. Wagner, W. E., and M. G. Reiser. 2000. The importance of calling song and courtship song in female mate choice in the variable field cricket. Animal Behaviour 59:1219-1226
55. Wiley, R. H., and D. G. Richards. 1982. Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. Pages 131-181 in D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds. Acoustic communication in birds. Academic Press, New York.
56. Zuk, M., and G. R. Kolluru. 1998. Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. Quarterly Review of Biology 73:415-438
57. Zuk, M., and L. W. Simmons. 1997. Reproductive strategies of the crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Pages 89-109 in J. C. Choe and B. J. Crespi, eds. Mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
58. Zuk, M., D. Rebar, and S. P. Scott. 2008. Courtship song is more variable than calling song in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Animal Behaviour 76:1065-1071.