Large-scale density-based screening for pea weevil resistance in advanced backcross lines derived from cultivated field pea (Pisum sativum) and Pisum fulvum

Crop and Pasture Science

Volumn 63, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 612-618

  Aryamanesh, N ^a   Byrne, O ^a,b   Hardie, D C ^a,b   Khan, T ^a,b   Siddique, K H M ^a   Yan, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

caesium chloride; interspecific hybridisation; introgression; Pisum sativum; wild pea relatives.

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; BIOASSAY; CULTIVAR; HARVESTING; HYBRIDIZATION; INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT; LEGUME; PEST RESISTANCE; PESTICIDE APPLICATION; PLANT BREEDING; WILD POPULATION;

EID: 84867629075     PISSN: 18360947     EISSN: 18365795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/CP12225     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Birks PR (1965) 'Pea weevil\-a new insect of peas in South Australia.' (Department of Agriculture, South Australia: Adelaide, S. Aust.)
2. Brindley TA (1933) Some notes on the biology of the pea weevil Bruchus pisorum L. (Coleoptera, Bruchidae) at Moscow, Idaho. Journal of Economic Entomology 26, 1058-1062.
3. Byrne OM, Hardie DC, Khan TN, Speijers J, Yan G (2008) Genetic analysis of pod and seed resistance to pea weevil in a Pisum sativum x P. fulvum interspecific cross. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 854-862. doi:10.1071/AR07353
4. Chen HM, Liu CA, George Kuo C, Chien CM, Sun HC, Huang CC, Lin YC, Ku HM (2007) Development of a molecular marker for a bruchid (Callosobruchus chinensis L.) resistance gene in mungbean. Euphytica 157, 113-122. doi:10.1007/s10681- 007-9400-z (Pubitemid 47338851)
5. Clement SL, Hardie DC, Elberson LR (2002) Variation among accessions of Pisumfulvum for resistance to pea weevil. Crop Science 42, 2167-2173. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2002.2167 (Pubitemid 35326260)
6. Clement SL, McPhee KE, Elberson LR, Evans MA (2009) Pea weevil, Bruchus pisorum L. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), resistance in Pisum sativum x Pisum fulvum interspecific crosses. Plant Breeding 128, 478-485. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523. 2008.01603.x
7. Cousin R (1997) Peas (Pisum sativum L.). Field Crops Research 53, 111-130. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290 (97) 00026-9 (Pubitemid 27307418)
8. Davies DR (1995) Peas Pisum sativum (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae). In 'Evolution of crop plants'. 2nd edn (Eds J Smartt, NW Simmonds) pp. 294-296. (Longman Scientific & Technical: Singapore)
9. Dixon PL, Knowlton AD (1994) Post-harvest recovery ofRhagoletis mendax Curran (Diptera: tephritidae) from low bush blueberry fruit. Canadian Entomologist 126, 121-123. doi:10.4039/Ent126121-1 (Pubitemid 2062528)
10. FAO (2010) FAOSTAT Database. (FAO: Rome) Available at: http://faostat. fao.org
11. Fatunla T, Badaru K (1983) Inheritance of resistance to cow-pea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus, Fabr.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 423-426. doi:10.1017/S0021859600037758
12. Fernandez GCJ, Talekar NS (1990) Genetics and breeding for bruchid resistance in Asiatic Vigna species. In 'Bruchids and legumes: economics, ecology and coevolution.' (Eds K Fujii, AMR Gatehouse, CD Johnson, R Mitchell, T Yoshida) pp. 209-217. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)
13. Girsch L, Cate PC, Weinhappel M (1999) A new method for determining the infestation of field beans (Vicia faba) and peas (Pisum sativum) with bean beetle (Bruchus rufimanus) and pea beetle (Bruchus pisorum), respectively. Seed Science and Technology 27, 377-383. (Pubitemid 29375243)
14. Hardie DC (1992) Resistance to the pea weevil in Pisum species. PhD Thesis, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
15. Hardie DC, Baker GJ, Marshall DR (1995) Field screening of Pisum accessions to evaluate their susceptibility to the pea weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Euphytica 84, 155-161. doi:10.1007/BF01677954
16. Hardie DC, Clement SL (2001) Development of bioassays to evaluate wild pea germplasm for resistance to pea weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Crop Protection 20, 517-522. doi:10.1016/S0261-2194 (01) 00018-7
17. Marzo F, Aguirre A, Castiella MV, Alonso R (1997) Fertilization effects of phosphorus and sulfur on chemcial composition of seeds ofPisum sativum L. and relative infestation by Bruchus pisorum L. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 45, 1829-1833. doi:10.1021/jf9701345 (Pubitemid 127485631)
18. Michael PJ, Hardie DC, Mangano P, Quinn TP, Pritchard IA (1990) The effectiveness of chemicals against the pea weevil, Bruchus pisorum (L.) and the native budworm, Helicoverpa punctigera Wallengren, on field peas, Pisum sativum L. in Western Australia. In 'Proceedings of the National Pea Weevil Workshop'. Melbourne, Vic. (Ed. MA Smith) pp. 51-56. (Victorian Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs: Melbourne)
19. Michael PJ, Hardie DC, Mangano PG (1993) Insect and mite control. In 'Growing field peas'. (Ed. J Carpenter) pp. 65-77. (Western Australian Department of Agriculture: South Perth, W. Aust.)
20. Newman LJ (1932) 'The pea weevil.' (Department of Agriculture, Western Australia: South Perth, W. Aust.)
21. Pajni HR, Sood S (1975) Effect of peapollen feeding on maturation and copulation in the beetle, Bruchus pisorum L. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 13, 202-203.
22. Pesho GR, Muehlbauer FJ, Harberts WH (1977) Resistance of pea introductions to the pea weevil. Journal of Economic Entomology 70, 30-33.
23. Rajendran S (2005) Detection of insect infestation in stored foods. In 'Advances in food and nutrition research.' (Ed. LT Steve) pp. 163-232. (Academic Press: Waltham, MA)
24. Siddique AB, Wright D (2003) Effects of different drying time and temperature on moisture percentage and seed quality (viability and vigour) of pea seeds (Pisum sativum L.). Asian Journal of Plant Science 2, 978-982. doi:10.3923/ajps.2003.978.982
25. Sommerfield KG (1989) Detection of larval pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum) (Linnaeus) infestations in imported peas. New Zealand Entomologist 12, 81-83. doi:10.1080/00779962.1989.9722573
26. Somta P, Ammaranan C, Ooi P, Srinives P (2007) Inheritance of seed resistance to bruchids in cultivated mungbean (Vigna radiata, L. Wilczek). Euphytica 155, 47-55. doi:10.1007/s10681-006-9299-9 (Pubitemid 46535997)
27. Souframanien J, Gupta S, Gopalakrishna T (2010) Identification of quantitative trait loci for bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) resistance in black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Euphytica 176, 349-356. doi:10.1007/s10681-010-0210-3
28. White NDG (1957) The practicability of flotation as a means for detecting infestation in wheat. Down to Earth, Summer Issue.
29. Young ND, Kumar L, Menancio-Hautea D, Danesh D, Talekar NS, Shanmugasundarum S, Kim D-H (1992) RFLP mapping of a major bruchid resistance gene in mungbean (Vigna radiata, L. Wilczek). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 84, 839-844. doi:10.1007/BF00227394