Pea weevil, Bruchus pisorum L. (Coleóptera: Bruchidae), resistance in Pisum sativum X Pisum fulvum interspecific crosses

Plant Breeding

Volumn 128, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 478-485

  Clement, S L ^a   Mcphee, K E ^a   Elberson, L R ^a   Evans, M A ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bruchids; Host, plant resistance; Insect resistance; Pisum fulvum; Pisum interspecific hybridization; Wild peas

Indexed keywords

BRUCHINAE; BRUCHUS PISORUM; COLEOPTERA; HEXAPODA; PISUM; PISUM FULVUM; PISUM SATIVUM;

EID: 70350460079     PISSN: 01799541     EISSN: 14390523     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2008.01603.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ben-Ze'ev, N., and D. Zohary, 1973: Species relationships in the genus Pisum L. Isr. J. Botany 22, 73-91.
2. Berdnikov, V. A., Y. A. Trusov, V. S. Bogdanova, O. E. Kosterin, S. M. Rozov, S. V. Nedel'Kina, and Y. N. Nikulina, 1992: The neoplastic pod gene (Np) may be a factor for resistance to the pest Bruchus pisorum L. Pisum Genet. 24, 37-39.
3. Birch, A. N. E., M. S. J. Simmonds, and W. M. Blaney, 1989: Chemical interactions between bruchids and legumes. In: C.H. Stirton, and J. L. Zaruccchi (eds), Advances in Legume Biology. Mongr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 29, 781-809.
4. Bragg, D. E., and J. W. Burns, 2000: Control of insects on traditional and semi-leafless spring dry peas, 1999. Arthrop. Manag. Tests 25, 285.
5. Brindley, T. A., 1933: Some notes on the biology of the pea weevil, Bruchus pisorum (L.) (Coleóptera: Bruchidae) at Moscow, Idaho. J. Econ. Entomol. 26, 1058-1062.
6. Brindley, T. A., 1934: A study of the biology and control of the pea weevil, Bruchus pisorum (L.) (Coleóptera: Bruchidae) in the Palouse area of Idaho and Washington. PhD Diss., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA, USA.
7. Byrne, O., N. Galwey, and D. Hardie, 2002: Searching for molecular markers for resistance to pea weevil. In: J. A. McComb (ed.), Proceedings of the 12th Australasian Plant Breeding Conference, Perth, Australia, 15-20 September 2002, 362-366. Australasian Plant Breeding Association, Inc., Perth.
8. Byrne, O. M., D. C.Hardie, T. Khan, and G. Yan, (2008): Genetic analysis of pod and seed resistance to pea weevil in a Pisum sativum x P.Julvum interspecific cross. Aust. J. Agrie. Res. 59, 854-862.
9. Clement, S. L., 1992: On the function of pea flower feeding by Bruchus pisorum. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 63, 115-121.
10. Clement, S. L., N. El-Din Sharaf El-Din, S. Weigand, and S. S. Lateef, 1994: Research achievements in plant resistance to insect pests of cool season food legumes. In: F. J. Muehlbauer, and W. J. Kaiser (eds), Expanding the Production and the Use of Cool Season Food Legumes, 290-304. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
11. Clement, S. L., M. Cristofaro, S. E. Cowgill, and S. Weigand, 1999: Germplasm resources, insect resistance, and grain legume improvement. In: S. L. Clement, and S. S. Quisenberry (eds), Global Plant Genetic Resources for Insect-Resistant Crops, 131-148. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
12. Clement, S. L., J. A. Wightman, D. C.Hardie, P. Bailey, G. Baker, and G. McDonald, 2000: Opportunities for integrated management of insect pests of grain legume. In: R. Knight (ed.), Linking Research and Marketing Opportunities for Pulses in the 21st Century, 467-480. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
13. Clement, S. L., D. C.Hardie, and L. R. Elberson, 2002: Variation among accessions of Pisum Julvum for resistance to pea weevil. Crop Sci. 42, 2167-2173.
14. Conicella, C., and A. Errico, 1990: Karyotype variations in Pisum sativum ect. abyssinicum. Caryologia 43, 87-97.
15. Doss, R. P., J. E. Oliver, W. M. Proebsting, S. W. Potter, S.-R. Kuy, S. L. Clement, R. T. Williamson, J. R. Carney, and E. D. DeVilbiss, 2000: Bruchins: insect-derived plant regulators that stimulate neoplasm formation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 97, 6218-6223.
16. Errico, A., C. Conicella, T. De Martino, R. Ercolan, and L. M. Monti, 1996: Chromosome reconstructions in Pisum sativum through interspecific hybridization with P. Julvum. J. Genet. Breed. 50, 309-313. (Pubitemid 27515310)
17. Fatunla, T., and K. Badaru, 1983: Resistance of cowpea pods to Callosobruchus maculates Fabr. J. Agrie. Sci. 100, 205-209.
18. Fery, R. L., and F. P. Cuthbert, Jr, 1979: Measurement of pod-wall resistance to the cowpea curculio in the southernpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) WaIp.). HortScience 14, 29-30.
19. Fondevilla, S., T. L. W. Carver, M. T. Moreno, and D. Rubiales, 2007a: Identification and characterization of sources of resistance to Erysiphe pisi in Pisum spp. Plant Breed. 126, 113-119. (Pubitemid 46457420)
20. Fondevilla, S., A. M. Torres, M. T. Moreno, and D. Rubiales, 2007b: Identification of a new gene for resistance to powdery mildew in Pisum Julvum, a wild relative of pea. Breed. Sci. 57, 181-184.
21. Gantner, R., M. Stjepanovic, S. Popovic, and Z. Greger, 2008: Resistance of field pea genotypes (Pisum sativum L.) to the occurrence of pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum L.) in seed. In: M. Pospíšil (ed.), Proceedings of the 43rd Croatian and 3rd International Symposium on Agriculture, 322-325, Opatija, Croatia.
22. Hardie, D. C., 1990: Pea weevil, Bruchus pisorum (L.), resistance in peas. In: A. M. Smith (ed.), Proceedings of the National Pea Weevil Workshop. Melbourne, Australia. 9-10 May 1990, 72-79. Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Melbourne.
23. Hardie, D. C., and S. L. Clement, 2001: Development of bioassays to evaluate wild pea germplasm for resistance to pea weevil (Coleóptera: Bruchidae). Crop Prot. 20, 517-522.
24. Hardie, D. C., G. J. Baker, and D. R. Marshall, 1995: Field screening of Pisum accessions to evaluate their susceptibility to the pea weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Euphytica 84, 155-161.
25. Hardie, D. C., H. Collie, S. L. Clement, and L. R. Elberson, 1999: Field evaluations of wild peas against pea weevil. Arthrop. Manag. Tests 24, 433-435.
26. Hoey, B. K., K. R. Crowe, V. M. Jones, and N. O. Polans, 1996: A phylogenetic analysis of Pisum based on morphological characters, and allozyme and RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92, 92-100.
27. Home, J., and P. Bailey, 1991: Bruchus pisorum L. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) control by knockdown pyrethroid in field peas. Crop Prot. 10, 53-56.
28. Jackai, L. E. N., S. Nokoe, B. O. Tayo, and P. Koona, 2001: Influences on pod wall and seed defenses against the brown cowpea coreid bug, Clavigralla tomentosicollis Stál. (Hem., Coreidae), in wild and cultivated Vigna species. J. Appl. Entomol. 125, 277-286.
29. Kaiser, W. J., B. C. Hellier, R. M. Hannan, and F. J. Muehlbauer, 1997: Growing techniques and conservation of wild perennial Cicer species in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Int. Chickpea Pigeonpea Newsl. 4, 7-8.
30. Marzo, F., A. Aguirre, M. V. Castiella, and R. Alonso, 1997: Fertilization effects of phosphorus and sulfur on chemical composition of seeds of Pisum sativum L. and relative infestation by Bruchus pisorum L. J. Agrie. Food. Chem. 45, 1829-1833. (Pubitemid 127485631)
31. Meichenheimer, R. D., and F. J. Muehlbauer, 1982: Growth and developmental stages of Alaska peas. Exp. Agrie. 18, 17-27.
32. Messina, F. J., 1984: Influence of cowpea pod maturity on the opposition choices and larval survival of a bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Entomol. Exp. Applic. 35, 241-248.
33. Michael, P. J., D. C. Hardie, G. P. Mangano, T. P. Quinn, and I. A. Pritchard, 1990: The effectiveness of chemicals against the pea weevil, Bruchus pisorum (L.), and native budworm, Helicoverpa punctigera Wallengren, on field peas, Pisum sativum, in Western Australia. In: A. M. Smith (ed.), Proceedings of the National Pea Weevil Workshop, Melbourne, Australia, 9-10 May 1990, 41-50. Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Melbourne.
34. Morton, R. L., H. E. Schroeder, K. S. Bateman, M. J. Chrispeels, E. Armstrong, and T. J. V. Higgins, 2000: Bean ot-amylase inhibitor 1 in transgenic peas (Pisum sativum) provides complete protection from pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum) under field conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97, 3820-3825.
35. Muehlbauer, F. J., W. J. Kaiser, and C. J. Simon, 1994: Potential for wild species in cool season food legume breeding. In: F. J. Muehlbauer, and W. J. Kaiser (eds), Expanding the Production and the Use of Cool Season Food Legumes, 531-539. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
36. O'Keeffe, L. E., H. W. Homan, and D. J. Schotzko, 1992: Pea Weevil and Its Control. Idaho Current Information Serial 885. Cooperative Extension System, University of Idaho, Moscow.
37. Ochatt, S. J., A. Benabdelmouna, P. Marget, G. Aubert, F. Moussy, C. Pontecaille, and L. Jacas, 2004: Overcoming hybridization barriers between pea and some of its wild relatives. Euphytica 137, 353-359.
38. Pesho, G. R., F. J. Muehlbauer, and W. H. Harberts, 1977: Resistance of pea introductions to the pea weevil. J. Econ. Entomol. 70, 30-33.
39. Pesho, G. R., and R. J. Van Houten, 1982: Pollen and sexual maturation of the pea weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 75, 439-443.
40. Pintureau, B., M. Gerding, and E. Cisternas, 1999: Description of three new species of Trichogrammatidae (Hymenoptera) from Chile. Can. Entomol. 131, 53-63.
41. Poole, R. W., 1974: An Introduction to Quantitative Ecology. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
42. Prescott, V. E., P. M. Campbell, A. Moore, J. Mattes, M. E. Rothenberg, P. S. Foster, T. J. V. Higgins, and S. P. Hogan, 2005: Transgenic expression of bean ot-amylase inhibitor in peas results in altered structure and immunogenicity. J. Agrie. Food. Chem. 53, 9023-9030.
43. Rusoke, D. G., and T. Fatunla, 1987: Inheritance of pod and seed resistance to the cow-pea seed beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus Fabr.). J. Agrie. Sci., Camb. 108, 655-660.
44. SAS Institute, Inc., 2003: SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 9.1. SAS Institute. Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
45. Schroeder, H. E., S. Gollasch, A. Moore, L. M. Tabe, S. Craig, D. C. Hardie, M. J. Chrispeels, D. Spencer, and T. J. V. Higgins, 1995: Bean ot-amylase inhibitor confers resistance to the pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum) in transgenic peas (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Physiol. 107, 1233-1239.
46. Simmonds, M. S. J., W. M. Blaney, and A. N. E. Birch, 1989: Legume seeds: the defense of a wild and cultivated species of Phaseolus against attack by bruchid beetles. Ann. Bot. 63, 177-184.
47. Smith, A. M., 1990a: Pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum L.) and crop-loss implications for management. In: K. Fujii, A. M. R. Gatehouse, C. D. Johnson, R. Mitchell, and T. Yoshida (eds), Bruchids and Legumes: Economics, Ecology and Coevolution, 105-114. Kluwer Academic, The Netherlands.
48. Smith, A. M. (ed.), 1990b: Proceedings of the National Pea Weevil Workshop, Melbourne, Australia, 9-10 May 1990. Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Melbourne.
49. Sousa-Majer, M. J., N. C. Turner, D. C. Hardie, R. L. Morton, B. Lamont, and T. J. V. Higgins, 2004: Response to water deficit and high temperature of transgenic peas (Pisum sativum L.) containing a seed-specific ot-amylase inhibitor and subsequent effects on pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum L.) survival. J. Exp. Bot. 55, 497-505.
50. Sousa-Majer, M. J., D. C. Hardie, N. C. Turner, and T. J. V. Higgins, 2007: Bean ot-amylase inhibitors in transgenic peas inhibit development of pea weevil larvae. J. Econ. Entomol. 100, 1416-1422.
51. Southwood, T. R. E., 1978: Ecological Methods. Chapman and Hill, London, UK.
52. Trichilo, P. J., and T. F. Leigh, 1985: The use of life tables to assess varietal resistance of cotton to spider mites. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 39, 27-33.
53. Vershinin, A. V., T. R. Allnutt, M. R. Knox, M. J. Ambrose, and T. H. N. Ellis, 2003: Transposable elements reveal the impact of introgression, rather than transposition, in Pisum diversity, evolution, and domestication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 2067-2075.
54. Zalucki, M. P., A. R. Clarke, and S. B. Malcolm, 2002: Ecology and behavior of first instar larval Lepidoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47, 361-393.
55. Zohary, D., 1973: The origin of cultivated cereals and pulses in the Near East. In: J. Wahrman, and K. R. Lewis (eds), Chromosomes Today, Vol. 4, 307-320. Wiley, New York, USA.