Genetic analysis of pod and seed resistance to pea weevil in a Pisum sativum x P. fulvum interspecific cross

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Volumn 59, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 854-862

  Byrne, O M ^a   Hardie, D C ^b   Khan, T N ^b   Speijers, J ^b   Yan, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Antibiosis; Bruchus pisorum; Interspecific hybridisation; Trigenic inheritance

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; BEETLE; CULTIVAR; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HERITABILITY; HYBRIDIZATION; INJURY; INTROGRESSION; LEGUME; MODELING; PEST RESISTANCE; TESTING METHOD;

BRUCHUS PISORUM; PISUM FULVUM; PISUM SATIVUM;

EID: 50449106462     PISSN: 00049409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/AR07353     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ACTA(1966) Biology and control of the pea weevil in Lotein, Hupeh, China. Acta Entomologica Sinica 15, 288-293.
2. Adjadi O, Singh BB, Singh SR (1985) Inheritance of bruchid resistance in cowpea. Crop Science 25, 740-742.
3. Ben-Ze'ev N, Zohary D (1973) Species relationships in the genus Pisum L. Israel Journal of Botany 22, 73-91.
4. Birks PR (1965) Pea weevil - a new insect of peas in South Australia. Journal of Agriculture, 156-160.
5. Brindley TA (1933) Some notes on the biology of the pea weevil Bruchus pisorum L. (Coleoptera, Bruchidae) at Moscow, Idaho. Journal of Economic Entomology 26, 1058-1062.
6. Brindley TA, Chamberlin JC, Schopp R (1956) The pea weevil and methods for its control. U.S. Department of Agriculture - Farmers' Bulletin No. 1971. pp. 1-24.
7. Byrne OMT (2005) Incorporation of pea weevil resistance from wild pea (Pisum fulvum) into cultivated field pea (Pisum sativum). PhD Thesis, The University of Western Australia, WA, Australia.
8. Clement SL, Hardie DC, Elberson LR (2002) Variation among accessions of Pisum fulvum for resistance to pea weevil. Crop Science 42, 2167-2173.
9. Dodds KS, Matthews P (1966) Neoplastic pod in the pea. Journal of Heredity 57, 83-88.
10. Doss RP, Oliver JE, Proebsting WM, Potter SW, Kuy S, Clement SL, Williamson RT, Carney JR, DeVilbiss ED (2000) Bruchins: insect-derived plant regulators that stimulate neoplasm formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 6218-6223. doi: 10.1073/pnas.110054697
11. Errico A, Conicella C, De Martino T, Ercolano R, Monti LM (1996) Chromosome reconstructions in Pisum sativum through interspecific hybridisation with P. fulvum. Journal of Genetics & Breeding 50, 309-313.
12. Falconer (1981) 'Introduction to quantitative genetics.' (Longman Group Limited: New York)
13. Fondevilla S, Torres AM, Moreno MT, Rubiales D (2007) Identification of a new gene for resistance to powdery mildew in Pisum fulvum, a wild relative of pea. Breeding Science 57, 181-184. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.57.181
14. Hardie DC (1992) Resistance to the pea weevil in Pisum species. PhD Thesis, The University of Adelaide, SA, Australia.
15. Hardie DC, Baker GJ, Marshall DR (1995) Field screening of Pisum accessions to evaluate their susceptibility to the pea weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Euphytica 84, 155-161. doi: 10.1007/BF01677954
16. Hardie DC, Clement SL (2001) Development of bioassays to evaluate wild pea germplasm for resistance to pea weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Crop Protection 20, 517-522. doi: 10.1016/S0261-2194(01)00018-7
17. Hoey BK, Crowe KR, Jones VM, Polans NO (1996) A phylogenetic analysis of Pisum based on morphological characters, and allozyme and RAPD markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92, 92-100. doi: 10.1007/BF00222957
18. Kornegay JL, Cardona C (1991) Inheritance of resistance to Acanthoscelides obtectus in a wild common bean accession crossed to commercial bean cultivars. Euphytica 52, 103-111.
19. Lawrence MJ, Jinks JL (1973) Quantitative genetics. In 'Practical genetics'. (Ed. PM Sheppard) pp. 86-129. (Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK)
20. Marzo F, Aguirre A, Castiella MV, Alonso R (1997) Fertilization effects of phosphorus and sulfur on chemical composition of seeds of Pisum sativum L. and relative infestation by Bruchus pisorum L. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 45, 1829-1833. doi: 10.1021/jf9701345
21. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) 'Generalized linear models.' (Chapman and Hall: London)
22. Muehlbauer FJ, Kaiser WJ (1994) Using host plant resistance to manage biotic stresses in cool season legumes. In 'Expanding the production and use of cool season food legumes'. (Eds FJ Muehlbauer, WJ Kaiser) pp. 233-246. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)
23. Newman LJ (1932) The pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum, Linn). Journal of Agriculture, Western Australia, 297-300.
24. Nuttal VW, Lyall LH (1964) Inheritance of neoplastic pods in pea. Journal of Heredity 55, 184-186.
25. Nyquist WE (1991) Estimation of heritability and prediction of selection response in plant populations. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 103, 235-322.
26. Ochatt SJ, Benabdelmouna A, Marget P, Aubert G, Moussy F, Pontecaille C, Jacas L (2004) Overcoming hybridisation barriers between pea and some of its wild relatives. Euphytica 137, 353-359. doi: 10.1023/B: EUPH.0000040476.57938.81
27. Parlevliet JE (1992) Selecting components of partial resistance. In 'Plant breeding in the 1990s'. (Eds HT Stalker, JP Murphy) pp. 281-302. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)
28. Pesho GR, Muehlbauer FJ, Harberts WH (1977) Resistance of pea introductions to the pea weevil. Journal of Economic Entomology 70, 30-33.
29. Pintureau B, Gerding M, Cisternas E (1999) Description of three new species of Trichogrammatidae (Hymenoptera) from Chile. Canadian Entomologist 131, 53-63.
30. 4 seed generation of two reciprocal crosses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 34, 697-705. doi: 10.1071/AR9830697
31. Redden RJ, McGuire J (1983) The genetic evaluation of bruchid resistance in seed of cowpea. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 34, 707-715. doi: 10.1071/AR9830707
32. Reyes-Valdés MH (2000) A model for marker-based selection in gene introgression breeding programs. Crop Science 40, 91-98.
33. Robinson RA (1996) Techniques. In 'Return to resistance'. (Ed. RA Robinson) pp. 277-303. (agAccess: Davis, CA)
34. Rusoke DG, Fatunla T (1987) Inheritance of pod and seed resistance to the cow-pea seed beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus Fabr.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108, 655-660.
35. Simmonds MSJ, Blaney WM, Birch ANE (1989) Legume seeds: the defence of a wild and cultivated species of Phaseolus against attack by bruchid beetles. Annals of Botany 63, 177-184.
36. Skaife SH (1918) Pea and bean weevils. Bulletin of the Department of Agriculture, Union of South Africa. pp. 1-32.
37. Smartt J (1984) Evolution of grain legumes. I. Mediterranean pulses. Experimental Agriculture 20, 275-296.
38. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1980) 'Statistical methods.' (The Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA)
39. Tanksley SD, Young ND, Paterson AH, Bonierbale MW (1989) RFLP mapping in plant breeding: new tools for an old science. Bio/Technology 7, 257-264. doi: 10.1038/nbt0389-257
40. Wright S (1968) 'Genetic and biometric foundations.' (The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL)
41. Wroth JM (1998) Possible role for wild genotypes of Pisum spp. to enhance ascochyta blight resistance in pea. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38, 469-479. doi: 10.1071/EA98024
42. Xu H, Qiang S, Han Z, Guo J, Huang Z et al. (2006) The status and causes of alien species invasion in China. Biodiversity and Conservation 15, 2893-2904. doi: 10.1007/s10531-005-2575-5