Does CT-Based navigation improve the long-term survival in ceramic-on-ceramic THA?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 470, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3054-3059

  Sugano, Nobuhiko ^a   Takao, Masaki ^a   Sakai, Takashi ^a   Nishii, Takashi ^a   Miki, Hidenobu ^b  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b OSAKA NATIONAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM PROSTHESIS; ADULT; AGE; AGED; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; BONE EROSION; CEMENTLESS PROSTHESIS; CERAMIC ON CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT; FEMUR HEAD PROSTHESIS; FOLLOW UP; GENDER; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; OSTEOLYSIS; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS BEARING BREAKAGE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; PROSTHESIS SURVIVAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WEIGHT BEARING;

EID: 84867580065     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2378-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Barrack RL, Burak C, Skinner HB. Concerns about ceramics in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:73-79.
2. Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:2456-2463.
3. Callaghan JJ, Dysart SH, Savory CG. The uncemented porouscoated anatomic total hip prosthesis: two-year results of a prospective consecutive series. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:337-346.
4. Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, Zurakowski D, Rubash HE, FreibergAA,MalchauH. The JohnCharnleyAward.Risk factors for cupmalpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:319-329.
5. DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell M, Simon DA, Morgan F, Moody JE, Nikou C, Colgan BD, Aston CA, Labarca RS, Kischell E, Kanade T. The Otto Aufranc Award. Image-guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:8-22.
6. EnghCA,GlassmanAH, SuthersKE. The case for porous-coated hip implants: the femoral side. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;261:63-81.
7. Furmanski J, Anderson M, Bal S, Greenwald AS, Halley D, Penenberg B, Ries M, Pruitt L. Clinical fracture of cross-linked UHMWPE acetabular liners. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5572-5582.
8. Haaker RG, Tiedjen K, Ottersbach A, Rubenthaler F, Stockheim M, Stiehl JB. Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:151-159.
9. Kalteis T, Handel M, Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Grifka J Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:163-167.
10. Kwon MS, Kuskowski M, Mulhall KJ, Macaulay W, Brown TE, Saleh KJ. Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:34-38.
11. Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Webb J, Nargol AV. The effect of component size and orientation on the concentrations of metal ions after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1143-1151.
12. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:217-220.
13. Merle d'Aubigné R, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954; 36:451-475.
14. Miki H, Yamanashi W, Nishii T, Sato Y, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N. Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:946-952.
15. Murphy SB, Ecker TM, Tannast M. THA performed using conventional and navigated tissue-preserving techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:160-167.
16. Najarian BC, Kilgore JE, Markel DC. Evaluation of component positioning in primary total hip arthroplasty using an imageless navigation device compared with traditional methods. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:15-21.
17. Nogler M, Kessler O, Prassl A, Donnelly B, Streicher R, Sledge JB, Krismer M. Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:159-163.
18. Parratte S, Argenson JN. Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:494-499.
19. Shon WY, Baldini T, Peterson MG, Wright TM, Salvati EA Impingement in total hip arthroplasty a study of retrieved acetabular components. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:427-435.
20. Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Yoshikawa H, Sato Y, Tamura S Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:455-460.
21. Sugano N, Sasama T, Sato Y, Nakajima Y, Nishii T, Yonenobu K, Tamura S, Ochi T. Accuracy evaluation of surface-based registration methods in a computer navigation system for hip surgery performed through a posterolateral approach. Comput Aided Surg. 2001;6:195-203.
22. Wixson RL, MacDonald MA. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimal posterior approach using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(suppl 3):51-56.
23. Wroblewski BM, Siney PD, Fleming PA. Effect of reduced diameter neck stem on incidence of radiographic cup loosening and revisions in Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:10-14.
24. Zicat B, Engh CA, Gokcen E. Patterns of osteolysis around total hip components inserted with and without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:432-439