Listen to each other: How the building of norms in an elementary science classroom fosters participation and argumentation

Learning in the Disciplines: ICLS 2010 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 1103-1110

  Ryu, Suna ^a   Sandoval, William A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELEMENTARY SCIENCE; ONE NORMS; PARTICIPATION RATE; POSITIVE POTENTIAL; SCIENCE CLASSROOM;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84867560750     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Andriessen, J. (2006). Arguing to learn. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 443-459). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and Methodlogical Challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
3. Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Saloman (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considertations (pp. 188-228). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
4. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1990). Communities of learning and thinking, or a contex by any other name Human Development, 21, 108-216.
5. Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in Classroom Mathematical Practices. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1/2), 113-163.
6. Cobb, P., & Whitenack, J. W. (1996). A method for conducting longitudinal analyses of classroom video recordings and transcripts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30(3), 213-228.
7. Cornelius, L. L. (2008). Student Participation in Desciplinary Discourses: When the Teacher Takes a Step Back, Who Takes a Step Forward? Paper presented at the International Conferences of the Learning Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands.
8. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994). Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5.
10. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
11. Duschl, R. A. (2008). Science education in 3 part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic and social goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268-291
12. Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds.). (2008). Argumentation in science education: perspectives from classroom-based research. Dordrecht: Springer.
13. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933.
14. Erickson, F. (1992). Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millroy & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 201-225): Academic Press
15. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant Structures, Scientific Discourse, and Student Engagement in Fourth Grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 431-473.
16. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
17. Miller, D. C., & Salkind, N. J. (2002). Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement (6 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications.
18. NRC. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19. Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating Scientific Discourse: Findings From Language Minority Classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(1), 61-94.
20. Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2008). Interpersonal influences on collaborative argument during scientific inquiry Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association
21. van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Henkemans, F. S., Blair, J. A., Johnson, R. H., Krabbe, E. C. W., et al. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory:A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
22. van Zee, E., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Using Questioning to Guide Student Thinking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(2), 227-269.
23. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
24. Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Ing, M. (2006). Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behaviour in peer-directed groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 63-120
25. Yackel, E., Rasmussen, C., & King, K. (2000). Social and sociomathematical norms in an advanced undergraduate mathematics course. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(3), 275-287.