Online dating recommender systems: The split-complex number approach

RSWeb'12 - Proceedings of the 4th ACM RecSys Workshop on Recommender Systems and the Social Web

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 37-44

  Kunegis, Jérôme ^a   Gröner, Gerd ^a   Gottron, Thomas ^a  

^a University of Koblenz   (Germany)

Author keywords

Online dating; Recommender system; Split complex numbers

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX NUMBER; MODELING APPROACH; NUMBER SYSTEM; ONLINE DATING; POTENTIAL PARTNERS; RECOMMENDATION METHODS; SPLIT-COMPLEX NUMBERS;

NUMBERING SYSTEMS; RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS; WEBSITES;

ONLINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84867459318     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2365934.2365942     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. S. Bull, J. Greer, G. McCalla, L. Kettel, and J. Bowes. User modelling in I-Help: What, why, when and how. In Proc. Int. Conf. on User Modeling, pages 117{126, 2001.
2. X. Cai, M. Bain, A. Krzywicki, W. Wobcke, Y. Kim, P. Compton, and A. Mahidadia. Reciprocal and heterogeneous link prediction in social networks. In Proc. Pacific-Asia Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 193{204, 2012.
3. W. K. Clifford. Preliminary sketch of quaternions. Proc. London Math. Soc., 4(1):381{395, 1873.
4. J. Cockle. On certain functions resembling quaternions, and on a new imaginary in algebra. Philos. Mag., 33(3):435{439, 1848.
5. A. Fiore and J. Donath. Homophily in online dating: When do you like someone like yourself? In Proc. Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1371{1374, 2005.
6. J. Greer, G. McGalla, J. Collins, V. Kumar, P. Meagher, and J. Vassileva. Supporting peer help and collaboration in distributed workplace environments. Int. J. of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9:159{177, 1998.
7. J. Hucks. Hyperbolic complex structures in physics. J. Math. Phys., 34(12):5986{6008, 1993.
8. J. Kunegis, E. W. De Luca, and S. Albayrak. The link prediction problem in bipartite networks. In Proc. Int. Conf. in Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems, pages 380{389, 2010.
9. J. Kunegis, D. Fay, and C. Bauckhage. Network growth and the spectral evolution model. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 739{748, 2010.
10. J. Kunegis and A. Lommatzsch. Learning spectral graph transformations for link prediction. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, pages 561{568, 2009.
11. J. Kunegis, A. Lommatzsch, and C. Bauckhage. The Slashdot Zoo: Mining a social network with negative edges. In Proc. Int. World Wide Web Conf., pages 741{750, 2009.
12. J. Malinowski, T. Keim, O. Wendt, and T. Weitzel. Matching people and jobs: A bilateral recommendation approach. In Proc. Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences, volume 6, pages 137c{137c, 2006.
13. A. Mirzal and M. Furukawa. Eigenvectors for clustering: Unipartite, bipartite, and directed graph cases. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Electronics and Information Engineering, pages 303{309, 2010.
14. D. Oard and J. Kim. Implicit feedback for recommender systems. In Proc. AAAI Workshop on Recommender Systems, pages 81{83, 1998.
15. L. Pizzato, T. Chung, T. Rej, I. Koprinska, K. Yacef, and J. Kay. Learning User Preferences in Online Dating. Technical Report 656, University of Syndey, 2010.
16. L. Pizzato, T. Rej, T. Chung, I. Koprinska, and J. Kay. RECON: A reciprocal recommender for online dating. In Proc. Conf. on Recommender Systems, pages 207{214, 2010.
17. B. Rosenfeld. Geometry of Lie Groups. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.
18. G. Sobczyk. The hyperbolic number plane. The College Math. J., 26:268{280, 1995.
19. L. Terveen and D. McDonald. Social matching: A framework and research agenda. ACM Trans. on Computer-Human Interaction, 12(3):401{434, 2005.