Strictly positive-definite spike train kernels for point-process divergences

Neural Computation

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 2223-2250

  Park, Il Memming ^a   Seth, Sohan ^a   Rao, Murali ^b   Pŕincipe, Jośe C ^a  

^a J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; NERVE CELL; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBABILITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TIME;

ACTION POTENTIALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBABILITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84867441577     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/NECO_a_00309     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Albright, T. D. (1984). Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 52(6), 1106-1130.
2. Berg, C., Christensen, J. P. R., & Ressel, P. (1984). Harmonic analysis on semigroups: Theory of positive definite and related functions. NewYork: Springer-Verlag.
3. Britten, K.H., Newsome,W. T., Shadlen,M. N., Celebrini, S.,& Movshon, J. A. (1996). A relationship between behavioral choice and the visual responses of neurons in macaque MT. Visual Neuroscience, 13(1), 87-100.
4. Christmann, A., & Steinwart, I. (2010). Universal kernels on non-standard input spaces. In J. Lafferty, C.K.I. Williams, J. Shawe-Taylor, R. Zemel, & A. Culotta (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 23 (pp. 406-414). Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
5. Churchland, M.M., Yu, B.M., Cunningham, J. P., Sugrue, L.P., Cohen,M. R.,Corrado, G. S., et al. (2010). Stimulus onset quenches neural variability: A widespread cortical phenomenon. Nature Neuroscience, 13(3), 369-378.
6. Daley, D. J., & Vere-Jones, D. (1988). An introduction to the theory of point processes. New York: Springer.
7. Dayan, P., & Abbott, L. F. (2001). Theoretical neuroscience: Computational and mathematical modeling of neural systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Deweese, M. R.,Wehr, M., & Zador, A. M. (2003). Binary spiking in auditory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(21), 7940-7949.
9. Diks, C., & Panchenko, V. (2007). Nonparametric tests for serial independence based on quadratic forms. Statistica Sinica, 17, 81-98.
10. Eichhorn, J., Tolias, A., Zien, A., Kuss, M., Rasmussen, C. E.,Weston, J., et al. (2004). Prediction on spike data using kernel algorithms. In S. Thrün, L. Soul, & B. Schölkopf (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 16 (pp. 1367-1374). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Fisher, N. K., & Banerjee, A. (2010). A novel kernel for learning a neuronmodel from spike train data. In J. Lafferty, C.K.I. Williams, J. Shawe-Taylor, R. Zemel, & A. Culotta (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 23 (pp. 595-603). Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
12. Gardner, D. (2004). Neurodatabase.org: networking the microelectrode. Nature Neuroscience, 7(5), 486-487.
13. Gretton, A., Borgwardt, K., Rasch, M., Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. (2007). A kernel method for the two-sample-problem. In B. Schölkopf, J. Platt,& T.Hoffman (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 19 (pp. 513-520). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Gretton, A., Fukumizu, K., Harchaoui, Z., & Sriperumbudur, B. (2009). A fast, consistent kernel two-sample test. In Y. Bengio, D. Schuurmans, J. Lafferty, C.K.I. Williams, & A. Culotta (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 22. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
15. Houghton, C. (2009). Studying spike trains using a van Rossum metric with a synapse-like filter. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 26(1), 149-155.
16. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1959). Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 148, 574-591.
17. Jacobs, A., Grzywacz, N., & Nirenberg, S. (2006). Decoding the parallel pathways of the retina. In Society for Neuroscience. Program No. 47.10/G1.
18. Johansson, R. S., & Birznieks, I. (2004). First spikes in ensembles of human tactile afferents code complex spatial fingertip events. Nature Neuroscience, 7(2), 170-177.
19. Kang, K., & Amari, S. (2008). Discrimination with spike times and ISI distributions. Neural Computation, 20(6), 1411-1426.
20. Li, L., Park, I.M., Seth, S., Choi, J., Francis, J. T., Sanchez, J.C., et al. (2011).Anadaptive decoder from spike trains to micro-stimulationusing kernel least-mean-square (KLMS) algorithm. In Proceedings, IEEE Machine Learning for Signal Processing, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
21. Mcfadden, J. A. (1965). The entropy of a point process. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 13(4), 988-994.
22. Naud, R., Gerhard, F., Mensi, S.,& Gerstner, W. (2011). Improved similarity measures for small sets of spike trains. Neural Computation, 23(12), 3016-3069.
23. Nawrot, M. P. P., Boucsein, C., Molina, V. R., Riehle, A., Aertsen, A., & Rotter, S. (2008). Measurement of variability dynamics in cortical spike trains. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 169(2), 374-390.
24. Paiva, A. R. C., Park, I.,& Pŕincipe, J. C. (2007). Innovating signal processing for spike train data. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
25. Paiva, A. R. C., Park, I., & Pŕincipe, J. C. (2009). A reproducing kernel Hilbert space framework for spike trains. Neural Computation, 21(2), 424-449.
26. Paiva, A. R. C., Park, I., & Pŕincipe, J. C. (2010). A comparison of binless spike train measures. Neural Computing and Applications, 19, 405-419.
27. Park, I., & Pŕincipe, J. C. (2010). Quantification of inter-trial non-stationarity in spike trains from periodically stimulated neural cultures. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (pp. 5442-5445). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
28. Pekalska, E., & Duin, R. P. W. (2005). The dissimilarity representation for pattern recognition. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing.
29. Perkel, D. H., Gerstein, G. L., & Moore, G. P. (1967). Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes. I. The single spike train. Biophysical Journal, 7(4), 391-418.
30. Pinkus, A. (2004). Strictly Hermitian positive definite functions. Journal d'Analyse Math́ematique, 94(1), 293-318.
31. Rao, M., Seth, S., Xu, J., Chen, Y., Tagare, H., & Pŕincipe, J. C. (2011). A test of independence based on a generalized correlation function. Signal Processing, 91(1), 15-27.
32. Reinagel, P., & Reid, R. C. (2002). Precise firing events are conserved across neurons. Journal of Neuroscience, 22(16), 6837-6841.
33. Ŕenyi, A. (1964). On an extremal property of the Poisson process. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 16(1), 129-133.
34. Schaback, R., & Wendland, H. (2001). Multivariate approximation and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Schölkopf, B. (1997). Support vector learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Berlin Technical University.
36. Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. J. (2002). Learning with kernels: Support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Schölkopf, B., Smola, A., & Müller, K. R. (1998). Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural Computation, 10(5), 1299-1319.
38. Schrauwen, B., & Campenhout, J. (2007). Linking non-binned spike train kernels to several existing spike train metrics. Neurocomputing, 70(7-9), 1247-1253.
39. Seth, S., Park, I., Brockmeier, A., Semework, M., Choi, J., Francis, J., et al. (2010). A novel family of non-parametric cumulative based divergences for point processes. In J. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, J. Shawe-Taylor, R. Zemel, & A. Culotta (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 23 (pp. 2119-2127). Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
40. Seth, S., Rao, M., Park, I. M., & Pŕincipe, J. C. (2010). A unified framework for quadratic measures of independence. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 59, 3624-3635.
41. Shpigelman, L., Singer, Y., Paz, R., & Vaadia, E. (2005). Spikernels: Predicting arm movements by embedding population spike rate patterns in inner-product spaces. Neural Computation, 17(3), 671-690.
42. Smola, A., Gretton, A., Song, L., & Schölkopf, B. (2007). A Hilbert space embedding for distributions. In ALT '07: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory (pp. 13-31). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
43. Song, L., Boots, B., Siddiqi, S., Gordon, G., & Smola, A. (2010). Hilbert space embeddings of Hidden Markov models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. Madison, WI: Omnipress.
44. Sriperumbudur, B., Fukumizu, K., Gretton, A., Lanckriet, G., & Schölkopf, B. (2009). Kernel choice and classifiability for RKHS embeddings of probability distributions. In Y. Bengio, D. Schuurmans, J. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, & A. Culotta (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 22 (pp. 1750-1758). Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
45. Sriperumbudur, B., Fukumizu, K., & Lanckriet, G. (2010). On the relation between universality, characteristic kernels and RKHS embedding of measures. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9, 773-780.
46. Sriperumbudur, B. K., Gretton, A., Fukumizu, K., Lanckriet, G., & Schölkopf, B. (2008). Injective Hilbert space embeddings of probability measures. In Proc. of the 21st Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory. Madison, WI: Curran Associates.
47. Tiesinga, P., Fellous, J.-M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2008). Regulation of spike timing in visual cortical circuits. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 97-107.
48. Vanrossum, M. C.W. (2001).Anovel spike distance. NeuralComputation, 13, 751-763.
49. Victor, J. D. (2002). Binless strategies for estimation of information from neural data. Physical Review E, 66(5), 051903.
50. Victor, J. D., & Purpura, K. P. (1997). Metric-space analysis of spike trains: Theory, algorithms and application. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 8(2), 127-164.