A reproducing kernel Hilbert space framework for spike train signal processing

Neural Computation

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 424-449

  Paiva, António R C ^a   Park, Il ^a   Príncipe, José C ^a  

^a J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LETTER; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TIME;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ALGORITHMS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEURONS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 67650298942     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2008.09-07-614     Document Type: Letter

References (43)

1. Aronszajn, N. (1950). Theory of reproducing kernels. Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 68(3), 337-404.
2. Berg, C., Christensen, J. P. R., & Ressel, P. (1984). Harmonic analysis on semigroups: Theory of positive definite and related functions. NewYork: Springer-Verlag.
3. Bohte, S. M., Kok, J. N., & Poutré, H. L. (2002). Error-backpropagation in temporally encoded networks of spiking neurons. Neurocomp., 48(1-4), 17-37.
4. Brown, E. N., Kass, R. E., & Mitra, P. P. (2004). Multiple neural spike train data analysis: State-of-the-art and future challenges. Nature Neurosci., 7, 456-461.
5. Carnell, A., & Richardson, D. (2005). Linear algebra for time series of spikes. In Proc. European Symp. onArtificial Neural Networks (pp. 363-368). Evere, Belgium: D-side.
6. Chi, Z., & Margoliash, D. (2001). Temporal precision and temporal drift in brain and behavior of zebra finch song. Neuron, 32, 899-910.
7. Chi, Z., Wu, W., Haga, Z., Hatsopoulos, N. G., & Margoliash, D. (2007). Template-based spike pattern identification with linear convolution and dynamic time warping. J. Neurophysiol., 97, 1221-1235.
8. Cox, D. R., & Isham, V. (1980). Point processes. London: Chapman and Hall.
9. Dayan, P., & Abbott, L. F. (2001). Theoretical neuroscience: Computational and mathematical modeling of neural systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Diggle, P., & Marron, J. S. (1988). Equivalence of smoothing parameter selectors in density and intensity estimation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 83(403), 793-800.
11. Harville, D. A. (1997). Matrix algebra from a statistician's perspective. New York: Springer.
12. Kailath, T. (1971). RKHS approach to detection and estimation problems-Part I: Deterministic signals in gaussian noise. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 17(5), 530-549.
13. Kailath, T., & Duttweiler, D. L. (1972). An RKHS approach to detection and estimation problems-Part III: Generalized innovations representations and a likelihood-ratio formula. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 18(6), 730-745.
14. Kass, R. E., & Ventura, V. (2001). A spike-train probability model. Neural Comp., 13(8), 1713-1720.
15. Kass, R. E., Ventura, V., & Cai, C. (2003). Statistical smoothing of neuronal data. Network: Comp. Neural Sys., 14, 5-15.
16. Kass, R. E., Ventura, V., & Brown, E. N. (2005). Statistical issues in the analysis of neuronal data. J. Neurophysiol., 94, 8-25.
17. Lowen, S. B., & Teich, M. C. (2005). Fractal-based point processes. Hoboken, NJ:Wiley.
18. Maass, W., & Bishop, C. M. (Eds.). (1998). Pulsed neural networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Maass, W., Natschläger, T., & Markram, H. (2002). Real-time computing without stable states: A new framework for neural computation based on perturbations. Neural Comp., 14(11), 2531-2560.
20. Mardia, K. V., & Jupp, P. E. (2000). Directional statistics. Hoboken, NJ:Wiley.
21. Moore, E. H. (1916). On properly positive Hermitian matrices. Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 23, 59.
22. Ng, A. Y., Jordan, M. I., & Weiss, Y. (2001). On spectral clustering: Analysis and an algorithm. In T. G. Dietterich, S. Becker, & Z. Ghahramani (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 14. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Paiva, A. R. C., Park, I., & Príncipe, J. C. (2008). Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces for spike train analysis. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP-2008. Las Vegas, NV: IEEE.
24. Paiva, A. R. C., Park, I., & Príncipe, J. C. (forthcoming). Optimization in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces of spike trains. In W. A. Chaovalitwongse, P. Pardalos, & P. Xanthopoulos (Eds.), Computational neuroscience. NewYork: Springer.
25. Paiva, A. R. C., Rao, S., Park, I., & Príncipe, J. C. (2007). Spectral clustering of synchronous spike trains. In Proc. of the IEEE Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks, IJCNN-2007. Orlando, FL: IEEE.
26. Paiva, A. R. C., Xu, J.-W., & Príncipe, J. C. (2006). Kernel principal components are maximum entropy projections. In Proc. of the Sixth Int. Conf. on Independent Component Analysis and Blind Source Separation, ICA-2006 (pp. 846-853). Berlin: Springer.
27. Parzen, E. (1959). Statistical inference on time series by Hilbert space methods (Tech. Rep. 23). Stanford, CA: Applied Mathematics and Statistics Laboratory, Stanford University.
28. Parzen, E. (1962). On the estimation of a probability density function and the mode. Annals Math. Stat., 33(2), 1065-1076.
29. Perkel, D. H., Gerstein, G. L., & Moore, G. P. (1967). Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes. II. Simultaneous spike trains. Biophys. J., 7(4), 419-440.
30. Príncipe, J. C., Xu, D., & Fisher, J. W. (2000). Information theoretic learning. In S. Haykin (Ed.), Unsupervised adaptive filtering (Vol. 2, pp. 265-319). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
31. Reiss, R.-D. (1993). A course on point processes. NewYork: Springer-Verlag.
32. Richmond, B. J., Optican, L. M., & Spitzer, H. (1990). Temporal encoding of two-dimensional patterns by single units in primate primary visual cortex. I. Stimulus-response relations. J. Neurophysiol., 64(2), 351-369.
33. Schölkopf, B., Burges, C. J. C., & Smola, A. J. (Eds.). (1999). Advances in kernel methods: support vector learning. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
34. Schölkopf, B., Smola, A., & Müller, K.-R. (1998). Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural Comp., 10(5), 1299-1319.
35. Schrauwen, B., & Campenhout, J. V. (2007). Linking non-binned spike train kernels to several existing spike train distances. Neurocomp., 70(7-8), 1247-1253.
36. Schreiber, S., Fellous, J.M., Whitmer, D., Tiesinga, P., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2003). A new correlation-basedmeasure of spike timing reliability. Neurocomp., 52-54, 925-931.
37. Snyder, D. L. (1975). Random point process in time and space. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
38. Truccolo, W., Eden, U. T., Fellows, M. R., Donoghue, J. P., & Brown, E. N. (2005). A point process framework for relating neural spiking activity to spiking history, neural ensemble, and extrinsic covariate effects. J. Neurophysiol., 93, 1074-1089.
39. van Rossum, M. C. W. (2001). A novel spike distance. Neural Comp., 13(4), 751-764.
40. Vapnik, V. N. (1995). The nature of statistical learning theory. NewYork: Springer.
41. Victor, J. D. (2005). Spike train metrics. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 15(5), 585-592.
42. Victor, J. D., & Purpura, K. P. (1997). Metric-space analysis of spike trains: Theory, algorithms, & application. Network: Comp. Neural Sys., 8, 127-164.
43. Wahba, G. (1990). Spline models for observational data. Philadelphia: SIAM.