Use of magnetic resonance imaging in detection of breast cancer recurrence: A systematic review

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 3035-3041

  Quinn, Edel Marie ^a   Coveney, Andrew Peter ^a   Redmond, Henry Paul ^a  

^a Department of Medicine National University of Ireland Cork   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SURGERY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TUMOR BIOPSY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84867401993     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2341-3     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:1296-316.
2. National Collaborating Centre for Cancer. Early and locally advanced breast cancer: diagnosis and treatment. Cardiff, Wales: National Collaborating Centre for Cancer; 2009.
3. Kimura M, Yanagita Y, Fujisawa T, Koida T. Study of timecourse changes in annual recurrence rates for breast cancer: data analysis of 2, 209 patients for 10 years post-surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;106:407-11.
4. Mendelson EB. Evaluation of the postoperative breast. Radiol Clin North Am. 1992;30:107-38.
5. Lewis-Jones HG, Whitehouse GH, Leinster SJ. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of local recurrent breast carcinoma. Clin Radiol. 1991;43:197-204.
6. Preda L, Villa G, Rizzo S, et al. Magnetic resonance mammography in the evaluation of recurrence at the prior lumpectomy site after conservative surgery and radiotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8:R53.
7. Belli P, Costantini M, Romani M, Marano P, Pastore G. Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer recurrence. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002;73:223-35.
8. Kerslake RW, Fox JN, Carleton PJ, et al. Dynamic contrastenhanced and fat suppressed magnetic resonance imaging in suspected recurrent carcinoma of the breast: preliminary experience. Br J Radiol. 1994;67:1158-68.
9. Viehweg P, Heinig A, Lampe D, Buchmann J, Heywang-Kobrunner SH. Retrospective analysis for evaluation of the value of contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with breast conservative therapy. MAGMA. 1998;7:141-52.
10. Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):563-71.
11. Houssami N, Hayes D. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:290-302.
12. Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180-7.
13. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:25.
14. Cohen EK, Leonhardt CM, Shumak RS, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in potential postsurgical recurrence of breast cancer: pitfalls and limitations. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1996;47:171-6.
15. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Shapeero LG, et al. Assessment of breast cancer recurrence with contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging: preliminary results in 26 patients. Radiology. 1993;177:473-8.
16. Goerres GW, Michel SC, Fehr MK, et al. Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET. Eur Radiol. 2003;12:1635-44.
17. Kramer S, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hagedorn K, Bautz W, Lang N. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of local recurrences in breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 1998;18:2159-62.
18. Mumtaz H, Davidson T, Hall-Craggs MA, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and conventional triple assessment in locally recurrent breast cancer. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1147-51.
19. Rieber A, Merkle E, Zeitler H, et al. Value of MR mammography in the detection and exclusion of recurrent breast carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;21:780-4.
20. Dao TH, Rahmouni A, Campana F, Laurfent M, Asselain B, Fourquet A. Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the irradiated breast: differentiation with dynamic gadolinium enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 1993;187:751-5.
21. Ball C, Sackett D, Phillips B, et al. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations. 1998. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://www.cebm.net/ levels-of-evidence.asp.
22. Drew PJ, Kerin MJ, Turnbull LW, et al. Routine screening for local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5:265-70.
23. Daly CP, Jaeger B, Sill DS. Variable appearances of fat necrosis on breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:1374-80.
24. Ganau S, Tortjada L, Escribano F, Andreu X, Sentis M. The great mimicker: fat necrosis of the breast-magnetic resonance mammography approach. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2009;38:189-97.
25. Li J, Dershaw DD, Lee CF, Joo S, Morris EA. Breast MRI after conservation therapy: usual findings in routine follow-up examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:799-807.
26. Ojeda-Fournier H, Olson LK, Rochelle M, Hodgens BD, Tong E, Yashar CM. Accelerated partial breast irradiation and posttreatment imaging evaluation. Radiographics. 2011;31:1701-16.
27. Cilotti A, Iacconi C, Marini C, et al. Contrast-enahnced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications. Radiol Med. 2007;112:272-86.
28. Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, Uchida Y. Dynamic contrastenhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;103:269-81.
29. Fiaschetti V, Pistolese CA, Perretta T, et al. 3-5 BI-RADs microcalcifications: correlation between MRI and histological findings. ISRN Oncol. 2011;2011:643890.
30. Peters NH, van Esser S, van den Bosch MA, et al. Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET-Randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:879-86.
31. American College of Radiology. Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 1998.