Genetically engineered Escherichia coli FBR5: Part I. Comparison of high cell density bioreactors for enhanced ethanol production from xylose

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1167-1178

  Qureshi, N ^a   Dien, B S ^a   Liu, S ^a   Saha, B C ^a   Hector, R ^a   Cotta, M A ^a   Hughes, S ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL UTILIZATION RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell recycle membrane reactor; Escherichia coli FBR5; Ethanol; Productivity; Xylose

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM ALGINATE GELS; CELL RECYCLE; CONTINUOUS REACTORS; CONTINUOUS STIRRED TANKS; ETHANOL CONCENTRATIONS; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; FREE CELLS; HIGH CELL DENSITY; MEMBRANE REACTOR; PACKED BED REACTOR; REACTOR SYSTEMS;

BATCH REACTORS; BIOREACTORS; CELLS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ETHANOL; GENETIC ENGINEERING; MEMBRANES; PACKED BEDS; PRODUCTIVITY; XYLOSE;

CYTOLOGY;

ALCOHOL; XYLOSE;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FERMENTATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY;

BIOMASS; BIOREACTORS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; XYLOSE;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 84867396421     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.1585     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Renewable Fuels Association. 2012. Available at http://www.ethanolrfa.org/pages/statistics. Accessed on January 19, 2012.
2. Qureshi N, Saha BC, Hector RE, Dien B, Hughes SR, Liu S, Bowman MJ, Sarath G, Cotta MA. Production of butanol (a biofuel) from agricultural residues: Part II-use of corn stover and switchgrass hydrolysates. Biomass Bioenergy 2010; 34: 566-571.
3. http://www.indexmundi.com/commodities/?commodity=corn&months=12 (accessed Jan 30, 2012).
4. Krishnan MS, Blanco M, Shattuck CK, Nghiem NP, Davison BH. Ethanol production from glucose and xylose by immobilized Zymomonas mobilis CP4(pZB5). Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2000; 84-86: 525-541.
5. Ingram LO, Convay T, Clark DP, Sewell GW, Preston JF. Genetic engineering for ethanol production in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987; 53: 2420-2425.
6. Ingram LO, Marr AG. Effect of temperature, pressure, pH, and osmotic stress on growth. In: Escherichia coli and Salmonella. In: Neidhardt FC, editor. Vol. 2. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 1996: 1570-1578.
7. Beall DS, Ohta K, Ingram LO. Parametric studies of ethanol production from xylose and other sugars by recombinant Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1991; 38: 296-303.
8. Ho NWY, Chen Z, Brainard AP. Genetically engineered Saccharomyces yeast capable of effective cofermentation of glucose and xylose. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998; 64: 1852-1859.
9. Dien BS, Cotta MA, Jeffries TW. Bacteria engineered for fuel ethanol production: current status. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003; 63: 258-266.
10. Dien BS, Nichols NN, O'Bryan PJ, Bothast RJ. Development of new ethanologenic Escherichia coli strains for fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2000; 84: 181-196.
11. Qureshi N, Annous BA, Ezeji TC, Karcher P, Maddox IS. Biofilm reactors for industrial bioconversion processes: employing potential of enhanced reaction rates. Microb Cell Fact. 2005; 4: 1-21.
12. Mehaia MA, Cheryan M. Immobilization of Lactobacillus bulgaricus in a hollow-fiber bioreactor for production of lactic acid from acid whey permeate. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1987; 14: 21-27.
13. Ohleyer E, Blanch HW, Wilke C. Continuous production of lactic acid in a cell recycle reactor. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1985; 11: 317-332.
14. Mehaia MA, Cheryan M. Lactic acid from acid whey permeate in a membrane recycle bioreactor. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1986; 8: 289-292.
15. Cheryan M, Mehaia MA. A high-performance membrane bioreactor for continuous fermentation of lactose to ethanol. Biotechnol Lett. 1983; 5: 519-524.
16. Cheryan M, Mehaia MA. Ethanol production in a membrane recycle bioreactor: conversion of glucose using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Process Biochem. 1984; 19: 204-208.
17. Afschar AS, Biebl H, Schaller K, Schugerl K. Production of acetone and butanol by Clostridium acetobutylicum in continuous culture with cell recycle. Appl Microb Biotechnol. 1985; 22: 394-398.
18. Pierrot P, Fick M, Engasser JM. Continuous acetone-butanol fermentation with high productivity by cell ultrafiltration and recycling. Biotechnol Lett. 1986; 8: 253-256.
19. Kierstan M, Bucke C. Immobilization of microbial cells, subcellular organelles and enzymes in calcium alginate gels. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1977; 19: 387-398.
20. Lawford HG, Rousseau JD, Mohagheghi A, McMillan JD. Continuous culture studies of xylose-fermenting Zymomonas mobilis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1998; 70-72: 353-367.
21. Qureshi N, Dien B, Nichols NN, Saha BC, Cotta MA. Genetically engineered Escherichia coli for ethanol production from xylose: substrate and product inhibition and kinetic parameters. Trans IChemE, Part C (Food Bioproducts Process). 2006; 84: 114-122.
22. Lawford HG, Rousseau JD. Loss of ethanologenicity in Escherichia coli B recombinants pLOI297 and KO11 during growth in the absence of antibiotics. Biotechnol Lett. 1995; 17: 751-756.
23. Chamy R, Nunez MJ, Lema JM. Product inhibition of fermentation of xylose to ethanol by free and immobilized Pichia stipitis. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1994; 16: 622-626.
24. Mehaia MA, Cheryan M. Ethanol production in a hollow fiber bioreactor using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microb Biotechnol. 1984; 20: 100-104.
25. Sreenath HK, Jeffries TW. Batch and membrane-assisted cell recycling in ethanol production by Candida shehatae. Biotechnol Lett. 1987; 9: 293-298.
26. Qureshi N, Maddox IS. A mathematical model of a fluidized bed reactor for the continuous production of solvents by immobilized Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 1990; 48: 369-378.
27. Dien BS, Bothast RJ. A primer for lignocellulose biochemical conversion to fuel ethanol. In: Ingledew WM, editor. The Alcohol Textbook. Nottingham, UK: Nottingham University Press, 2009.
28. Ingledew WM. Continuous fermentation in the fuel alcohol industry: how does the technology affect yeast. In: Jacques KA, Lyons TP, Kelsall DR, editors. The Alcohol Textbook, 4th ed. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press; 2003: 135-143.
29. Lawford HG, Rousseau JD. Factors contributing to the loss of ethanologenicity of Escherichia coli B recombinants pLOI297 and KO11. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1996; 57-58: 293-305.
30. Dien BS, Hespell RB, Wyckoff HA, Bothast RJ. Fermentation of hexose and pentose sugars using a novel ethanologenic Escherichia coli strain. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1998; 23: 366-371.
31. Lynd LR, van Zyl WH, Mcbride JE, Laser M. Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005; 16: 577-583.
32. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Galbe M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Liden G, Zacchi G. Bio-ethanol-the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. Trends Biotechnol. 2006; 24: 549-546.
33. Saha BC, Cotta MA. Continuous ethanol production from wheat straw hydrolysate by recombinant ethanologenic Escherichia coli strain FBR5. Appl Microb Biotechnol. 2011; 90: 477-487.