Cueing effects of target location probability and repetition

Vision Research

Volumn 73, Issue , 2012, Pages 23-29

  Kabata, Takashi ^a   Matsumoto, Eriko ^a  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cueing effects; Intertrial effects; Probability; Repetition; Statistical learning; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FACILITATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY CUEING EFFECT; RESPONSE TIME; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867389843     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Biederman I. Perceiving real-world scenes. Science 1972, 177:77-80.
2. Brascamp J.W., Pels E., Kristjánsson A. Priming of pop-out on multiple time scales during visual search. Vision Research 2011, 51:1972-1978.
3. Campana G., Casco C. Repetition effects of features and spatial position: Evidence for dissociable mechanisms. Spatial Vision 2009, 22:325-338.
4. Chun M.M. Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:170-178.
5. Chun M.M., Jiang Y. Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology 1998, 36:28-71.
6. Druker M., Anderson B. Spatial probability aids visual stimulus discrimination. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2010, 4. fnhum.2010.00063.
7. Fecteau J.H., Korjoukov I., Roelfsema P.R. Location and color biases have different influences on selective attention. Vision Research 2009, 49:996-1005.
8. Friesen C.K., Kingstone A. The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1998, 5:490-495.
9. Geng J.J., Behrmann M. Probability cuing of target location facilitates visual search implicitly in normal participants and patients with hemispatial neglect. Psychological Science 2002, 13:520-525.
10. Geng J.J., Behrmann M. Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics 2005, 67:1252-1268.
11. Geng J.J., Eger E., Ruff C.C., Kristjánsson A., Rotshtein P., Driver J. On-line attentional selection from competing stimuli in opposite visual fields: Effects on human visual cortex and control processes. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 96:2601-2612.
12. Geyer T., Müller H.J., Krummenacher J. Cross-trial priming of element positions in visual pop-out search is dependent on stimulus arrangement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:788-797.
13. Girshick A.R., Landy M.S., Simoncelli E.P. Cardinal rules: Visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics. Nature Neuroscience 2011, 14:926-932.
14. Hillstrom A.P. Repetition effects in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics 2000, 62:800-817.
15. Hoffmann J., Kunde W. Location-specific target expectancies in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:1127-1141.
16. Ishibashi K., Kita S., Wolfe J.M. The effects of local prevalence and explicit expectations on search termination times. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 2012, 74:115-123.
17. Kristjánsson A. " I know what you did on the last trial" - A selective review of research on priming in visual search. Frontiers in Bioscience 2008, 13:1171-1181.
18. Kristjánsson A., Mackeben M., Nakayama K. Rapid, object-based learning in the deployment of transient attention. Perception 2001, 30:1375-1387.
19. Kristjánsson Arni., Nakayama K. A primitive memory system for the deployment of transient attention. Perception and Psychophysics 2003, 65:711-724.
20. Liu C.L., Chiau H.Y., Tseng P., Hung D.L., Tzeng O.J., Muggleton N.G., et al. The antisaccade cost is modulated by contextual experience of location probability. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 103:1438-1447.
21. Maljkovic V., Nakayama K. Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception and Psychophysics 1996, 58:977-991.
22. Miller J. Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1988, 14:453-471.
23. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1980, 32:3-25.
24. Rabbitt P., Cumming G., Vyas S. Modulation of selective attention by sequential effects in visual search tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1979, 31:305-317.
25. Sayim B., Grubert A., Herzog M.H., Krummenacher J. Display probability modulates attentional capture by onset distractors. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(3):1-8. (article no. 10).
26. Shaw M.L., Shaw P. Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1977, 3:201-211.
27. Shore D.I., Klein R.M. On the manifestations of memory in visual search. Spatial Vision 2000, 14:59-75.
28. Walthew C., Gilchrist I.D. Target location probability effects in visual search: An effect of sequential dependencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:1294-1301.
29. Wolfe J.M., Van Wert M.J. Varying target prevalence reveals two dissociable decision criteria in visual search. Current Biology 2010, 20:121-124.
30. Yokoyama T., Ishibashi K., Hongoh Y., Kita S. Attentional capture by change in direct gaze. Perception 2011, 40:785-797.