Do political attitudes affect consumer choice? Evidence from a large-scale field study with genetically modified bread in Switzerland

Sustainability

Volumn 3, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1555-1572

  Aerni, Philipp ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Conditioned feelings; Field study; Freedom of choice; GM food; Mental construal; Political preference; Revealed consumer behavior

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867366994     PISSN: 20711050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su3091555     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. ISAAA. Global status of commercialized biotech/gm crops: 2010 report. In Proceedings of ISAAA; Cornell University: Ithaka, NY, USA, 2010.
2. Miller, H. Auf Wiedersehen, agbiotech. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 974-975.
3. Gaskell, G. Europeans and Biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and Trends; A report to the European Commission's Directorate General for Research: Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
4. Herring, R.J. Opposition to transgenic technologies: Ideology, interests and collective action frames. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9, 58-63.
5. Aerni, P.; Bernauer, T. Stakeholder attitudes towards GMOs in the Philippines, Mexico and South Africa: The issue of public trust. World Dev. 2006, 34, 557-575.
6. Bonfadelli, H.; Dahinden, U. Gentechnologie in der öffentlichen Kontroverse. Eine Sozialwissenschaftliche Analyse; Seismo Verlag: Zürich, Switzerland, 2002.
7. Siegrist, M. Perception of gene technology, and food risks: Result of a survey in Switzerland. J. Risk Res. 2003, 6, 45-60.
8. Einsele, A. The gap between science and perception: The case of plant biotechnology in Europe. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2007, 107, 1-11.
9. Bonfadelli, H.; Meier, W.A. Grüne Gentechnologie im öffentlichen Diskurs. Interessen, Konflikte und Argumente. UVK: Konstanz, Germany, 2010.
10. Aerni, P. What is sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence of diverging views in Switzerland and New Zealand. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 1872-1882.
11. Dispute Settlement Panel Report (DSP). European communitiesMeasures affecting the approval and marketing of biotech products. In Proceeding of the Dispute DS291, Geneva, Switzerland, 27-31 March 2006. Available online: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds291_e.htm (accessed on 20 September 2011).
12. Lichtenstein, S.; Slovic, P. The Construction of Preference; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2006.
13. Nelkin, D. Selling Science; W.H. Freeman & Company: New York, NY, USA, 1995.
14. Finucane, M.; Satterfield, T. Risk as narrative value: A theoretical framework for facilitating the biotechnology debate. Int. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 7, 128-146.
15. Pronin, E. How we see ourselves and how we see others. Science 2008, 320, 177-180.
16. Tavris, C.; Aronson, E. Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts; Harcourt Inc: Orlando, FL, USA, 2007.
17. Zajonc, R.B. Feeling and thinking. Preferences need no inferences. Am. Psychol. 1980, 35, 151-175.
18. Hammerl, H. I like it, but only when I'm not sure why: Evaluative conditioning and the awareness issue. Conscious Cogn. 2000, 8, 37-40.
19. Jones, C.R.; Fazio, R.H.; Olson, M.A. Implicit misattribution as a mechanism underlying evaluative conditioning. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2009, 96, 933-948.
20. Eurobarometer. Social Values, Science and Technology; The Commission of the European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2005.
21. Connor, M.; Siegrist, M. Factors influencing people's acceptance of gene technology: The role of knowledge, health expectations, naturalness, and social trust. Sci. Commun. 2010, 32, 514-538.
22. Kahneman, D.; Ritov, I.; Schkade, D. Economic preferences or attitude expressions? An analysis of dollar responses to public issues. J. Risk Uncertain. 1999, 9, 5-38.
23. Fazio, R.H.; Zanna, M.P. Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1981, 14, 161-202.
24. Foster-Zigerli, J. Bio Trotzt Billig. News and Trends in Biomarkt 2005/2006; Biosuisse: Zürich, Switzerland, 2006. Available online: http://www.bio-zh-sh.ch/Newsarchiv/ZuercherBauer/2006/Wo13.pdf (accessed on 20 September 2011)
25. Avnet, T.; Higgins, E.T. How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. J. Market. Res. 2006, 43, 1-10.
26. Cesario, J.; Grant, H.; Higgins, E.T. Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from "feeling right". J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2004, 86, 388-404.
27. Ariely, D.; Norton, M.I. Conceptual consumption. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2009, 60, 475-499.
28. Carlsson, F.; Fryblom, P.; Lagerkvist, C.J. Consumer benefits of labels and bans on GMO food-Choice experiment with Swedish consumers. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2007, 89, 153-161.
29. Scatasta, S.; Wesseler, J.; Hobbs, J. Differentiating the consumer benefits from labelling of GM food products. Agric. Econ. 2007, 37, 237-242.
30. Gruere, G. P.; Carter, C. A.; Farzin, Y. H. Explaining international differences in genetically modified food labeling policies. Rev. Int. Econ. 2009, 17, 393-408.
31. Kirchhoff, S.; Zago, A. A simple model of voluntary vs. mandatory labelling of GMOs. In Proceedings of the Istituto Nazionale di Economia Agraria (INEA), Rome, Italy, 14 May, 2001. Available online: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/20540/1/sp01ki04.pdf (accessed on 20 September 2011)
32. Panksepp, J. Affective consciousness: Core emotional feelings in animals and humans. Conscious. Cogn.2005, 14, 30-80.
33. Maia, T.V. Fear conditioning and social groups: Statistics, not genetics. Cogn. Sci. 2009, 33, 1232-1251.
34. Stahl, C.; Unkelbach, C.; Corneille, O. On the respective contributions of awareness of US valence and US identity in attitude formation through evaluative conditioning. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2009, 97, 404-420.
35. Kerlinger, F.N. Liberalism and Conservatism: The Nature and Structure of Social Attitudes; Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1984.
36. Feldman, S. Values, ideologies, and structure of political attitudes. In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology; Sears, D.O., Huddy, L., Jervis, R., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
37. Sears, D.; Lau, R.; Tyler, T.; Harris, A., Jr. Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidental voting. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 1980, 74, 670-684.
38. Lewis-Beck, M.; Stegmaier, M. Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 2000, 3, 183-219.
39. Jost, J.T. The end of the end of ideology. Am. Psychol. 2006, 61, 651-670.
40. Knight, K. Transformations of the concept of ideology in the twentieth century. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 2006, 100, 619-626.
41. Jost, J.T.; Federico, C.M.; Napier, J.L. Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2009, 60, 307-337.
42. Crano, W.D.; Prislin, R. Attitudes and persuasion. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2006, 57, 345-374.
43. Jost, J.T.; Glaser, J.; Kruglanski, A.W.; Sulloway, F. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychol. Bull. 2003, 129, 339-375.
44. Pyszczynski, T.; Greenberg, J.; Solomon, S. A dual process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: An extension of terror management theory. Psychol. Rev. 1999, 106, 835-845.
45. Converse, P.E. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Ideology and Discontent; Apter, D., Ed.; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1964.
46. Appiah, A. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers; W.W. Norton & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2007.
47. Frankfurter, H. On Bullshit; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2005.
48. Sennett, R. The Fall of Public Man; W.W. Norton & Company: New York, NY, USA, 1976.
49. Beck, U. Living your own life in a runaway world: Individualization, globalization and politics. In On the Edge: Living with Global Capitalism; Hutton, W., Giddens, A., Eds.; Jonathan Cape: London, UK, 2000.
50. Petty, R.E.; Cacioppo, J.T. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1986.
51. Slovic, P.; Finucane, M.L.; Peters, E.; MacGregor, D.G. The Affect Heuristic. In Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment; Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., Kahneman, D., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2002, pp. 397-420.
52. Mizerski, R.; Golden, L.L.; Kernan, J.B. The attributional process in consumer decision making. J. Consum. Res. 1979, 6, 123-140.
53. Milkman, K.L.; Rogers, T.; Bazerman, M.H. Harnessing our inner angels and demons: What we have learned about want/should conflicts and how that knowledge can help us reduce short-sighted decision making. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2008, 3, 324-338.
54. Gerber, A.S.; Green, D P.; Shachar, R. Voting may be habit-forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 2003, 47, 540-550.
55. Liberman, N.; Trope, Y. The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science 2008, 322, 1201-1205.
56. Crano, W.D.; Hannula-Bral, K.A. Context/categorization model of social influence: Minority and majority influence in the formation of a novel response norm. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1994, 30, 247-276.
57. Kashima, Y.; Fiedler, K.; Freytag, P. Stereotype Dynamics: Language-based Approaches to the Formation, Maintenance, and Transformation of Stereotypes; CRC Press: London, UK, 2007.
58. Halford, N.G.; Shewry, P.R. Genetically modified crops: Methodology, benefits, regulation and public concerns. British Med. Bullet. 2000, 56, 62-73.
59. Grunert, K.G.; Bech-Larsen, T.; Lähteenmäki, L.; Ueland, Ø.; Åström, A. Attitudes towards the use of GMOs in food production and their impact on buying intention: The role of positive sensory experience. Agribusiness 2004, 20, 95-107.
60. Noussair, C.; Robin, S.; Ruffieux, B. Do consumers really refuse to buy genetically modified food? Econom. J. 2004, 114, 102-120.
61. Brunsø, K.; Scholderer, J.; Grunert, K.G. Closing the gap between values and behavior-A means-End theory of lifestyle. J. Busin. Res. 2004, 6, 665-670.
62. Kalaitzandonakes, N.; Marks, L.A.; Vickner, S.S. Sentiments and acts towards genetically modified foods. Int. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 7, 161-177.
63. European Commission. Do Europeans Buy GM Foods? King's College: London, UK, 2008. Available online: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/schools/biohealth/research/nutritional/consumerchoice (accessed on 20 September 2011).
64. Noussair, C.; Robin, S.; Ruffieux, B. Do consumers not care about biotech foods or do they just not read labels? Econ. Lett. 2002, 75, 47-53.
65. Grunert, K.G.; Wills, J.M. A review of European research of research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. J. Public Health 2007, 15, 385-399.
66. Knight, J.G.; Mather, D.W.; Holdsworth, D.K.; Ermen, D.F. Acceptance of GM food-An experiment in six countries. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 507-508.
67. Morgan, D.L.; Morgan, R.K. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference; Cambridge University Press: London, UK, 2001.
68. Erb, H.P.; Bohner, G. Mere consensus effects in minority and majority influence. In Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation; de Dreu, C.K.W., de Vries, N.K., Eds; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001.
69. Crano, W.D. Social influence, social identity, and ingroup leniency. In Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation; de Dreu, C.K.W., de-Vries, N.K., Eds; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA 2001; pp, 122-143.
70. Erb, H.P.; Bohner, G.; Rank, S.; Einwiller, S. Processing minority and majority communications: The role of conflict and prior attitudes. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2002, 28, 1172-1182.
71. Mackie, D.M. Systematic and non-systematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1987, 43, 41-52.
72. Shadish, W.R.; Cook, T.D.; Campbell, D.T. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design for Generalized Causal Inference; Houghton-Miflin: Boston, MA, USA, 2002.
73. Shadish, W.R.; Cook, T.D. The renaissance of field experimentation in evaluating interventions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2009, 60, 607-629.
74. Wu, F.U.; Miller, J.D.; Casman, E.A. The economic impact of Bt corn resulting from mycotoxin reduction. J. Toxicol. 2004, 23, 397-424.
75. Aerni, P.; Scholderer, J.; Ermen, D. What would Swiss consumers decide if they had freedom of choice? Evidence from a field study with organic, conventional and genetically modified corn. 2011, Food Policy, doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.08.002.
76. Aerni, P.; Grün, K.-J. Moral und Angst: Erkenntnisse aus der Moralpsychologie und der politischen Theologie. Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht Verlag: Göttingen, Germany, 2011.