Investigating the usability of iPad mobile tablet in formative assessment of a mathematics course

International Conference on Information Society, i-Society 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 39-44

  Isabwe, Ghislain Maurice Norbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

mobile technology; peer assessment; usability

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; MATHEMATICS COURSE; MOBILE TECHNOLOGY; PEER ASSESSMENT; PEER TO PEER ASSESSMENT; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGICAL TOOLS; USABILITY; USABILITY PROBLEMS;

HAND HELD COMPUTERS; INFORMATION SCIENCE; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

USABILITY ENGINEERING;

EID: 84867362570     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. E. Z.-F. Liu, "Peer and self assessment for mobile learning," in Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Lugano, Switzerland, 2004, pp. 4370-4372.
2. N. P. Morris, "Podcasts and mobile assessment enhance student learning experience and academic performance," Bioscience education, vol. 16, Dec. 2010.
3. C. Chen, "The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-assessment system," Comput. Educ., vol. 55, pp. 229-236, Jan. 2010.
4. D. R. Sadler, "Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems," Instructional Science, vol. 18, pp. 119-144, Jun. 1989.
5. K. Topping, "Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities," Review of Educational Research, vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 249-276, 1998.
6. M. L. Wen and c.-C. Tsai, "Online peer assessment in an inservice science and mathematics teacher education course," Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 13, No.1, pp. 55-67,2008.
7. P. Black and D. Wiliam, "Assessment and classroom learning," Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol. 5, No.1, pp. 7-74, 1998.
8. K. E. Dunn and S. W. Mulvenon, "A critical review of research on formative assessment: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education," Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, vol. 14, No. 7, pp. 1-11, Mar. 2009.
9. C. Aoun, "Peer-assessment and learning outcomes : product deficiency or process defectiveness?," in Proceedings of the 34th International Association for Educational Assessment (IAEA) Annual Conference, Cambridge, UK, 2008.
10. P. Nokelainen, "An empirical assessment of pedagogical usability criteria for digital learning material with elementary school students," Educational Technology & Society, vol. 9, No.2, pp. 178-197, Apr.2006.
11. J. Nielsen, "Evaluating hypertext usability," in Designing hypermedia for learning, ed: Springer-Verlag, 1990, pp. 147-168.
12. J. S. Dumas and J. C. Redish, A practical guide to usability testing. Oregon, USA: Intellect Books, 1999.
13. J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering. Boston: Academic press, 1993.
14. F. D. Davis, "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology," MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, pp. 319-340, Sept. 1989.
15. Exemplars, "Classic Math Rubric," 2006. http://www.exemplars. com/assets/files/math-Jubric.pdf. (Access date: 21 May, 2012)
16. G. Egodawatte, "A rubric to self-assess and peer-assess mathematical problem solving tasks of college students," Acta Didactica Napocensia, vol. 3, No.1, pp. 75-88, Mar. 2010.