Structure-function relationship of the macular visual field sensitivity and the ganglion cell complex thickness in glaucoma

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 53, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 5044-5051

  Na, Jung Hwa ^a   Kook, Michael S ^a   Lee, Youngrok ^a   Baek, Seunghee ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; GANGLION CELL COMPLEX THICKNESS; HUMAN; MACULAR VISUAL FIELD SENSITIVITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC NERVE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETINA INNER PLEXIFORM LAYER; RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; AGED; GLAUCOMA; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBER; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RETINA GANGLION CELL; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MACULA LUTEA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84867351940     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-9401     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Burr JM, Kilonzo M, Vale L, Ryan M. Developing a preference-based glaucoma utility index using a discrete choice experiment. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:797-808.
2. Aspinall PA, Johnson ZK, Azuara-Blanco A, Montarzino A, Brice R, Vickers A. Evaluation of quality of life and priorities of patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49: 1907-1915.
3. Caprioli J, Spaeth GL. Comparison of visual field defects in the low-tension glaucomas with those in the high-tension glaucomas. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;97:730-737.
4. Koseki N, Araie M, Suzuki Y, Yamagami J. Visual field damage proximal to fixation in normal-and high-tension glaucoma eyes. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1995;39:274-283.
5. Araie M, Yamagami J, Suziki Y. Visual field defects in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1993; 100:1808-1814.
6. Weber J, Dannheim F, Dannheim D. The topographical relationship between optic disc and visual field in glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1990;68:568-574.
7. Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1809-1815.
8. Seong M, Sung KR, Choi EH, et al. Macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurements by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal-tension glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:1446-1452.
9. Kim NR, Lee ES, Seong GJ, Kim JH, An HG, Kim CY. Structure-function relationship and diagnostic value of macular ganglion cell complex measurement using Fourier-domain OCT in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:4646-4651.
10. Tan O, Chopra V, Lu AT, et al. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:2305-2314.
11. Rao HL, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Sample PA, Alencar LM, Medeiros FA. Comparison of different spectral domain optical coherence tomography scanning areas for glaucoma diagnosis. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1692-1699.
12. Nakatani Y, Higashide T, Ohkubo S, Takeda H, Sugiyama K. Evaluation of macular thickness and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness for detection of early glaucoma using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma. 2011;20:252-259.
13. Huang JY, Pekmezci M, Mesiwala N, Kao A, Lin S. Diagnostic power of optic disc morphology, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and macular inner retinal layer thickness in glaucoma diagnosis with fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma. 2011;20:87-94.
14. Garas A, Vargha P, Hollo G. Diagnostic accuracy of nerve fibre layer, macular thickness and optic disc measurements made with the RTVue-100 optical coherence tomograph to detect glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 2011;25:57-65.
15. Cho JW, Sung KR, Lee S, et al. Relationship between visual field sensitivity and macular ganglion cell complex thickness as measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6401-6407.
16. Greenfield DS, Bagga H, Knighton RW. Macular thickness changes in glaucomatous optic neuropathy detected using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121: 41-46.
17. Guedes V, Schuman JS, Hertzmark E, et al. Optical coherence tomography measurement of macular and nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous human eyes. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:177-189.
18. Heijl A, Bengtsson B. The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:19-22.
19. Takagi ST, Kita Y, Yagi F, Tomita G. Macular retinal ganglion cell complex damage in the apparently normal visual field of glaucomatous eyes with hemifield defects. J Glaucoma. 2011; 21:318-325.
20. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982; 100:135-146.
21. Schlottmann PG, De Cilla S, Greenfield DS, Caprioli J, Garway-Heath DF. Relationship between visual field sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness as measured by scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1823-1829.
22. Garway-Heath DF, Holder GE, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Relationship between electrophysiological, psychophysical, and anatomical measurements in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2213-2220.
23. Leung CK, Chong KK, Chan WM, et al. Comparative study of retinal nerve fiber layer measurement by StratusOCT and GDx VCC, II: structure/function regression analysis in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3702-3711.
24. Leung CK, Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, et al. American Chinese glaucoma imaging study: a comparison of the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer in detecting glaucomatous damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:2644-2652.
25. Hood DC, Anderson SC, Wall M, Kardon RH. Structure versus function in glaucoma: an application of a linear model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3662-3668.
26. Desatnik H, Quigley HA, Glovinsky Y. Study of central retinal ganglion cell loss in experimental glaucoma in monkey eyes. J Glaucoma. 2006;5:46-53.
27. Zeimer R, Asrani S, Zou S, Quigley H, Jampel H. Quantitative detection of glaucomatous damage at the posterior pole by retinal thickness mapping. A pilot study. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:224-231.
28. Takagishi M, Hirooka K, Baba T, Mizote M, Shiraga F. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and visual field sensitivity. J Glaucoma. 2011;20:383-387.
29. Choi J, Kim KH, Lee CH, et al. Relationship between retinal nerve fibre layer measurements and retinal sensitivity by scanning laser polarimetry with variable and enhanced corneal compensation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:906-911.
30. Mai TA, Reus NJ, Lemij HG. Structure-function relationship is stronger with enhanced corneal compensation than with variable corneal compensation in scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1651-1658.
31. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN. Association between scanning laser polarimetry measurements using variable corneal polarization compensation and visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:961-966.
32. Gonzalez-Hernandez M, Pablo LE, Armas-Dominguez K, de la Vega RR, Ferreras A, de la Rosa MG. Structure-function relationship depends on glaucoma severity. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:1195-1199.
33. Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Smith EL III, Crawford ML. Scaling the structure-function relationship for clinical perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005;83:448-455.