Use of different sources of information for the recovery and genetic management of endangered populations: Example with the extreme case of Iberian pig Dorado strain

Livestock Science

Volumn 149, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 282-288

  Fernández, Jesús ^a   Clemente, Ignacio ^b   Amador, Carmen ^a   Membrillo, Alberto ^c   Azor, Pedro ^c   Molina, Antonio ^c  

^a INIA   (Spain)

^b Centro Tecnológico Andaluz del Sector Cárnico TEICA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CÓRDOBA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Ex situ conservation; Genetic recovery; Iberian pig; Rare breeds

Indexed keywords

SUIDAE;

EID: 84867332212     PISSN: 18711413     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.07.019     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Amador C., Toro M.A., Fernández J. Removing exogenous information using pedigree data. Conserv. Genet. 2011, 12:1565-1573.
2. Anderson E.C., Dunham K.K. The influence of family groups on inferences made with the programme structure. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2008, 8:1219-1229.
3. Baumung R., Solkner J. Pedigree and marker information requirements to monitor genetic variability. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2003, 35:369-383.
4. Carrodeguas J.A., Burgos C., Moreno C., Sánchez A.C., Ventanas S., Tarrafeta L., Barcelona J.A., López M.A., Oria R., López-Buesa P. Incidence in diverse pig populations of an IGF2 mutation with potential influence on meat quality and quantity: an assay based on real time PCR (RT-PCR). Meat Sci. 2005, 71:577-582.
5. Colleau J.J., Moureaux S., Briend M., Bechu J. A method for the dynamic management of genetic variability in dairy cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2004, 36:373-394.
6. Eding H., Meuwissen T.H.E. Marker-based estimates of between and within population kinships for the conservation of genetic diversity. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2001, 118:141-159.
7. Engelsma K.A., Veerkamp R.F., Calus M.P.L., Windig J.J. Consequences for diversity when prioritizing animals for conservation with pedigree or genomic information. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2011, 128:473-481.
8. Falconer D.S., Mackay T.F.C. An Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1996, Longman, Harlow, England. 4th ed.
9. FAO, 2004. Secondary Guidelines for Development of National Farm Animal Genetic Resources Management Plans. Measurement of Domestic Animal Diversity (MoDAD): Recommended Microsatellite Markers. Rome, Italy.
10. Fernández A., Fabuel E., Alves E., Rodríguez C., Silió L., Óvilo C. DNA tests based on coat colour genes for authentication of the raw material of meat products from Iberian pigs. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2004, 84:1855-1860.
11. Fernández J., Toro M.A., Caballero A. Practical implementation of optimal management strategies in conservation programmes: a mate selection method. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 2001, 24:17-24.
12. Frankham R., Ballou J.D., Briscoe D.A. Introduction to Conservation Genetics 2002, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
13. Grundy B., Villanueva B., Woolliams J.A. Dynamic selection procedures for constrained inbreeding and their consequences for pedigree development. Genet. Res. 1998, 72:159-168.
14. Leroy G., Verrier E., Meriaux J.C., Rognon X. Genetic diversity of dog breeds: within-breed diversity comparing genealogical and molecular data. Anim. Genet. 2009, 40:323-332.
15. Meuwissen T.H.E. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. J. Anim. Sci. 1997, 75:934-940.
16. Pardo J., Mata C., Barba C., Rodero A., Delgado J.V., Molina A., Diéguez E., Cañuelo P. Morphometric study in red varieties of Iberian pig breed and Jabugo spotted. Arch. Zootec. 1998, 47:287-290.
17. Pritchard J.K., Stephens M., Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000, 155:945-959.
18. Sysa P. Polymorphism of metaphase chromosomes in swine (Sus scrofa L.). Genetica 1980, 52-53:213-315.
19. Wang J. Optimal marker-assisted selection to increase the effective size of small populations. Genetics 2001, 157:867-874.