The influence of family groups on inferences made with the program Structure

Molecular Ecology Resources

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1219-1229

  Anderson, E C ^a   Dunham, K K ^a  

^a SOUTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Assignment test; Family structure; Multilocus genotype; Sibling inference; Unsupervised clustering

Indexed keywords

ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS;

EID: 55149118958     PISSN: 1755098X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02355.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allendorf FW, Phelps SR (1981) Use of allelic frequencies to describe population structure. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 38, 1507 1514.
2. Almudevar A, Field C (1999) Estimation of single-generation sibling relationships based on DNA markers. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 4, 136 165.
3. Anderson EC, Dunham KK (2005) spip 1.0: a program for simulating pedigrees and genetic data in age-structured populations. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5, 459 461.
4. Anderson EC, Thompson EA (2002) A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics, 160, 1217 1229.
5. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F (2007) Genetix 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Technical Report. ISEM UMR5554, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier (France).
6. Clemento A, Anderson EC, Boughton D, Girman D, Garza JC (in press) Population genetic structure and ancestry of Oncorhynchus mykiss populations above and below dams in South-Central California. Conservation Genetics.
7. Corander J, Waldmann P, Marttinen P, Sillanpaa MJ (2004) baps 2: enhanced possibilities for the analysis of genetic population structure. Bioinformatics, 20, 2363 2369.
8. Dawson KJ, Belkhir K (2001) A Bayesian approach to the identification of panmictic populations and the assignment of individuals. Genetical Research, 78, 59 77.
9. R Development Core Team (2007) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN, 3-900051-07-0.
10. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software Structure: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology, 14, 2611 2620.
11. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics, 164, 1567 1587.
12. Frankham R (1995) Conservation genetics. Annual Review of Genetics, 29, 305 327.
13. Funk WC, Blouin MS, Corn PS et al 2005) Population structure of Columbia spotted frogs (Rana luteiventris) is strongly affected by the landscape. Molecular Ecology, 14, 483 496.
14. Gao H, Williamson S, Bustamante CD (2007) A Markov chain Monte Carlo approach for joint inference of population structure and inbreeding rates from multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 176, 1635 1651.
15. Hansen M, Jensen L (2005) Sibship within samples of brown trout (Salmo trutta) and implications for supportive breeding. Conservation Genetics, 6, 297 305.
16. Hudson RR (2002) Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation. Bioinformatics (Oxford), 18, 337 338.
17. Kraaijeveld-Smit FJL, Beebee TJC, Griffiths RA, Moore RD, Schley L (2005) Low gene flow but high genetic diversity in the threatened Mallorcan midwife toad Alytes muletensis. Molecular Ecology, 14, 3307 3315.
18. Latch EK, Dharmarajan G, Glaubitz JC, Rhodes OE (2006) Relative performance of Bayesian clustering software for inferring population substructure and individual assignment at low levels of population differentiation. Conservation Genetics, 7, 295 302.
19. Moritz C (1994) Defining 'Evolutionarily Significant Units' for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 9, 373 375.
20. Nagylaki (1995) The inbreeding effective population number in dioecious populations. Genetics, 139, 473 485.
21. Oyler-Mccance SJ, Taylor SE, Quinn TW (2005) A multilocus population genetic survey of the greater sage-grouse across their range. Molecular Ecology, 14, 1293 1310.
22. Paetkau D (1999) Using genetics to identify intraspecific conservation units: a critique of current methods. Conservation Biology, 13, 1507 1509.
23. Paetkau D, Calvert W, Stirling I, Strobeck C (1995) Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Molecular Ecology, 4, 347 354.
24. Patterson N, Price AL, Reich D (2006) Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genetics, 2, 2074 2093.
25. Petit RJ, El Mousadik A, Pons O (1998) Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conservation Biology, 12, 844 855.
26. Pritchard JK, Wen W (2004) Documentation for Structure Software: Version 2. Technical Report. Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
27. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155, 945 959.
28. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution, 49, 1280 1283.
29. Rosenberg NA, Pritchard JK, Weber JL et al 2002) Genetic structure of human populations. Science, 298, 2381 2385.
30. Selkoe KA, Toonen RJ (2006) Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecology Letters, 9, 615 629.
31. Slatkin M (1995) A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics, 139, 457 462.
32. Wang J (2004) Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genetics, 166, 1963 1979.
33. Waples RS, Gaggiotti OE (2006) What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Molecular Ecology, 15, 1419 1439.
34. Wright S (1965) The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution, 19, 395 420.