Should we individualize breast cancer screening?

Maturitas

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 202-205

  Desreux, J ^a   Bleret, V ^a   Lifrange, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Breast cancer risk; Breast cancer screening; Breast density; Cost effectiveness; Individualization

Indexed keywords

ESTROGEN; GESTAGEN;

AGE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER HORMONE THERAPY; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLIMACTERIUM; CONSULTATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALIZATION; LOW RISK POPULATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; MENOPAUSE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHENOTYPE; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGE FACTORS; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; RISK;

EID: 84867329417     PISSN: 03785122     EISSN: 18734111     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.08.004     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. J.S. Reis-Filho, and L. Pusztai Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: classification, prognostication, and prediction Lancet 378 9805 2011 1812 1823
2. American Cancer Society. Global cancer facts and figures; 2008. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/ document/acspc-027766.pdf
3. L.W. Lietzen, G.V. Sorensen, and A.G. Ording Survival of women with breast cancer in central and northern Denmark, 1998-2009 Clinical Epidemiology 3 Suppl. 1 2011 35 40
4. P. Autier, M. Boniol, A. Gavin, and L.J. Vatten Breast cancer mortality in neighbouring European countries with different levels of screening but similar access to treatment: trend analysis of WHO mortality database British Medical Journal 343 2011 d4411
5. P.C. Gotzsche, and M. Nielsen Screening for breast cancer with mammography Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews 19 January (1) 2011 CD001877
6. P. Autier, M. Boniol, and R. Middleton Advanced breast cancer incidence following population-based mammographic screening Annals of Oncology 22 2011 1726 1735
7. P. Suhrke, J. Mæhlen, and E. Schlichting Effect of mammography screening on surgical treatment for breast cancer in Norway: comparative analysis of cancer registry data British Medical Journal 343 2011 1 8
8. R.C. Burton, R.J. Bell, G. Thiagarajah, and C. Stevenson Adjuvant therapy, not mammographic screening, accounts for most of the observed breast cancer specific mortality reductions in Australian women since the national screening program began in 1991 Breast Cancer Research Treatment 131 3 2012 949 955
9. N.K. Stout, M.A. Rosenberg, A. Trentham-Dietz, M.A. Smith, S.M. Robinson, and D.G. Fryback Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography Journal of the National Cancer Institute 98 2006 774 782
10. C.H. Ahern, and Y. Shen Cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography and clinical breast examination strategies: a comparison with current guidelines Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 18 2009 718 725
11. J.T. Schousboe, K. Kerlikowske, A. Loh, and S.R. Cummings Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness Annals of Internal Medicine 155 2011 10 20
12. A. Decarli, S. Calza, G. Masala, C. Specchia, D. Palli, and M.H. Gail Gail model for prediction of absolute risk of invasive breast cancer: independent evaluation in the Florence-European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition cohort Journal of the National Cancer Institute 98 2006 1686 1693
13. J.T. Lowery, T. Byers, and J.E. Hokanson Complementary approaches to assessing risk factors for interval breast cancer Cancer Causes and Control 22 2011 23 31
14. A.H. Olsen, K. Bihrmann, M.B. Jensen, I. Vejborg, and E. Lynge Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study British Journal of Cancer 100 7 2009 1205 1208
15. C.M. Checka, J.E. Chun, F.R. Schnabel, J. Lee, and H. Toth The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening American Journal of Roentgenology 198 March (3) 2012 292 295
16. K. Kerlikowske, A. Cook, and D.S.M. Buist Breast cancer risk by breast density, age, menopause, and postmenopausal hormone therapy use Journal of Clinical Oncology 28 24 2010 3830 3837
17. L. Yaghjyan, G.A. Colditz, and L.C. Collins Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics Journal of the National Cancer Institute 103 2011 1179 1189
18. H. Eerola, P. Heikkila, and A. Tamminen Histopathological features of breast tumours in BRCA1, BRCA2 and mutation-negative breast cancer families Breast Cancer Research 7 1 2005 R93 R100
19. H.D. Nelson, B. Zakher, and A. Cantor Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40-49 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis Annals of Internal Medicine 156 9 2012 635 648
20. FH01 collaborative teams Mammographic surveillance in women younger than 50 years who have a family history of breast cancer: tumour characteristics and projected effect on mortality in the prospective, single-arm, FH01 study Lancet Oncology 11 2010 1127 1134
21. K.P. Lowry, J.M. Lee, and C.Y. Kong Annual screening strategies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers: a comparative effectiveness analysis Cancer 118 8 2012 2021 2030
22. E.D. Pisano, C. Gatsonis, and E. Hendrick Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening New England Journal of Medicine 353 2005 1773 1783
23. J. Nederend, L.E. Duijm, M.W. Louwman, J.H. Groenewoud, A.B. Donkers-van Rossum, and A.C. Voogd Impact of transition from analog screening mammography to digital screening mammography on screening outcome in The Netherlands: a population-based study Annals of Oncology June 2012 [Epub ahead of print]
24. V. Corsetti, N. Houssami, and M. Ghirardi Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up European Journal of Cancer 47 7 2011 1021 1026
25. W.A. Berg, Z. Zhang, and D. Lehrer Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk JAMA 307 13 2012 1394 1404
26. M. Nothacker, V. Duda, and M. Hahn Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review BMC Cancer 9 2009 335
27. M. Morrow, J. Waters, and E. Morris MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment Lancet 378 9805 2011 1804 1811
28. E. Lifrange, V. Bleret, and J. Desreux Benefits and limitations of mammography Revue Medicale de Liege 58 5 2003 331 337
29. E. Warner Breast-cancer screening New England Journal of Medicine 365 2011 1025 1032
30. M.G. del Carmen, E.F. Halpern, and D.B. Kopans Mammographic breast density and race American Journal of Roentgenology 188 2007 1147 1150
31. M.J. Lund, K.F. Trivers, and P.L. Porter Race and triple negative threats to breast cancer survival: a population-based study in Atlanta, GA Breast Cancer Research Treatment 113 2009 357 370
32. D.B. Kopans Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk Radiology 246 2 2008 348 353
33. E. Mathieu, A. Barrat, and H.M. Davey Informed choice in mammography screening Archives of Internal Medicine 167 19 2007 2039 2046