Choosing a fishery's governance structure using data poor methods

Marine Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 123-131

  Dichmont, Catherine Mary ^a   Pascoe, Sean ^a   Jebreen, Edward ^b   Pears, Rachel ^c   Brooks, Kate ^d   Perez, Pascal ^a,e  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION   (Australia)

^c GREAT BARRIER REEF MARINE PARK AUTHORITY   (Australia)

^d KAL Analysis   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Data limited; Governance; Management strategy evaluation; Qualitative; Stakeholder engagement; Trawl

Indexed keywords

DECISION ANALYSIS; FISHERY ECONOMICS; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FISHERY PRODUCTION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER; STOCK ASSESSMENT; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABILITY; TRAWLING; WORLD HERITAGE SITE;

AUSTRALIA; GREAT BARRIER REEF MARINE PARK; QUEENSLAND;

EID: 84867329010     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.018     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Hanna S.S. Strengthening governance of ocean fishery resources. Ecol Econ 1999, 31:275-286.
2. Worm B., Hilborn R., Baum J.K., Branch T.A., Collie J.S., Costello C., et al. Rebuilding global fisheries. Science 2009, 325:578-585.
3. Jentoft S., Chuenpagdee R. Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Mar Policy 2009, 33:553-560.
4. Rittel H.W.J., Webber M.M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 1973, 4:155-169.
5. Ludwig D. The era of management is over. Ecosystems 2001, 4:758-764.
6. Davis N.A. Broadening participation in fisheries management planning: a tale of two committees. Soc Nat Res Int J 2011, 24:103-118.
7. Walters C.J. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources 1986, MacMillan Publishing Co, New York.
8. van Vugt M. Averting the tragedy of the commons. Curr Direct Psychol Sci 2009, 18:169-173.
9. Gutierrez N.L., Hilborn R., Defeo O. Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 2011, 470:386-389.
10. Bishop J., Venables W.N., Dichmont C.M., Sterling D.J. Standardizing catch rates: is logbook information by itself enough?. ICES J Mar Sci 2008, 65:255-266.
11. Punt A.E., Smith A.D.M. Harvest strategy evaluation for the eastern gemfish (Rexea solandri). ICES J Mar Sci 1999, 56:860-875.
12. Smith A.D.M. Management strategy evaluation - the light on the hill. Population Dynamics for Fisheries Management 1994, 249-253. Perth: Australian Society for Fish Biology, Perth. D.A. Hancock (Ed.).
13. Garcia S.M. Precautionary Approach to Fisheries Management 2005, AO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Rome.
14. Leung P.S., Muraoka J., Nakamoto S.T., Pooley S. Evaluating fisheries management options in Hawaii using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Fish Res 1998, 36:171-183.
15. Pascoe S., Bustamante R., Wilcox C., Gibbs M. Spatial fisheries management: a framework for multi-objective qualitative assessment. Ocean Coast Manage 2009, 52:130-138.
16. Dichmont C.M.A. Case study in successful management of a data-poor fishery using simple decision rules: the Queensland Spanner Crab Fishery. Mar Coast Fish Dyn, Manage Ecosyst Sci 2010, 2:1-13.
17. Dowling N.A., Smith D.C., Knuckey I., Smith A.D.M., Domaschenz P., Patterson H.M., et al. Developing harvest strategies for low-value and data-poor fisheries: case studies from three Australian fisheries. Fish Res 2008, 94:380-390.
18. Pascoe S, et al. Management objectives of Queensland fisheries: putting the horse before the cart. Mar Policy 2012. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.016.
19. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York.
20. Pascoe S., Proctor W., Wilcox C., Innes J., Rochester W., Dowling N. Stakeholder objective preferences in Australian Commonwealth managed fisheries. Mar Policy 2009, 33:750-758.
21. Butterworth D.S., Punt A.E. Experiences in the evaluation and implementation of management procedures. ICES J Mar Sci 1999, 56:985-998.
22. Fulton E.A., Smith A.D.M., Smith D.C. Alternative management strategies for Southeast Australian Commonwealth fisheries: Stage 2: quantitative management strategy evaluation. Fish Res Dev Copor 2007, 400.
23. Mukheibir P. Qualitative assessment of municipal water resource management strategies under climate impacts: the case of the Northern Cape, South Africa. Water SA 2007, 33:575-581.
24. Proctor W MCDA and Stakeholder participation: valuing forest resources. Alternatives for Environmental Valuation 2005, 134-158. Routledge, Arbington. M. Getzner, C. Spash, S. Stagl (Eds.).
25. Mardle S., Pascoe S., Boncoeur J., Gallic B.L., García-Hoyo J.J., Herrero I., et al. Objectives of fisheries management: case studies from the UK, France, Spain and Denmark. Mar Policy 2002, 26:415-428.
26. Soma K. How to involve stakeholders in fisheries management - a country case study in Trinidad and Tobago. Mar Policy 2003, 27:47-58.
27. Mardle S., Pascoe S. Modelling the effects of trade-offs between long and short-term objectives in fisheries management. J Environ Manage 2002, 65:49-62.