Spatial fisheries management: A framework for multi-objective qualitative assessment

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 130-138

  Pascoe, Sean ^a   Bustamante, Rodrigo ^a   Wilcox, Chris ^a   Gibbs, Mark ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION THEORY; FISHERIES; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES; COASTAL FISHERIES; EXPERT OPINIONS; FISHERIES MANAGEMENTS; MULTI OBJECTIVES; MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES; QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; SPATIAL MANAGEMENTS; SPATIAL MODELS;

FLEET OPERATIONS;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; FISHERY MODELING; FISHERY STATISTICS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STOCK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 58949100869     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2008.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Hanna S.S. Strengthening governance of ocean fishery resources. Ecological Economics 31 2 (1999) 275-286
2. Mardle S., Pascoe S., Boncoeur J., Le Gallic B., Garcia-Hoyo J.J., Herrero I., et al. Objectives of fisheries management: case studies from the UK, France, Spain and Denmark. Marine Policy 26 6 (2002) 415-428
3. Imeson R.J., and van den Bergh J.C.J.M. Policy failure and stakeholder dissatisfaction in complex ecosystem management: the case of the Dutch Wadden Sea shellfishery. Ecological Economics 56 4 (2006) 488-507
4. Hilborn R. Defining success in fisheries and conflicts in objectives. Marine Policy 31 2 (2007) 153-158
5. Enriquez-Andrade R.R., and Vaca-Rodriguez J.G. Evaluating ecological tradeoffs in fisheries management: a study case for the yellowfin tuna fishery in the Eastern Pacific Ocean. Ecological Economics 48 3 (2004) 303-315
6. Vaca-Rodriguez J.G., and Enriquez-Andrade R.R. Analysis of the eastern Pacific yellowfin tuna fishery based on multiple management objectives. Ecological Modelling 191 2 (2006) 275-290
7. Cheung W.L., and Sumaila U.R. Trade-offs between conservation and socio-economic objectives in managing a tropical marine ecosystem. Ecological Economics 66 1 (2008) 193-210
8. Pascoe S., and Mardle S. Optimal fleet size in the English Channel: a multi-objective programming approach. European Review of Agricultural Economics 28 2 (2001) 161-183
9. Mardle S., and Pascoe S. Modelling the effects of trade-offs between long and short-term objectives in fisheries management. Journal of Environmental Management 65 1 (2002) 49-62
10. Pradhan N.C., and Leung P. Incorporating sea turtle interactions in a multi-objective programming model for Hawaii's longline fishery. Ecological Economics 60 1 (2006) 216-227
11. Fulton E.A., Smith A.D.M., and Johnson C.R. Effects of spatial resolution on the performance and interpretation of marine ecosystem models. Ecological Modelling 176 1-2 (2004) 27-42
12. Sanchirico J.N., and Wilen J.E. Bioeconomics of spatial exploitation in a patchy environment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37 (1999) 129-150
13. Sanchirico J.N., and Wilen J.E. A bioeconomic model of marine reserve creation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 42 3 (2001) 257-276
14. Smith M.D. Spatial search and fishing location choice: methodological challenges of empirical modeling. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82 5 (2000) 1198-1206
15. Smith M.D., and Wilen J.E. Economic impacts of marine reserves: the importance of spatial behaviour. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46 2 (2003) 183-206
16. Little L.R., Punt A.E., Mapstone B.D., Pantus F., Smith A.D.M., Davies C.R., et al. ELFSim - a model for evaluating management options for spatially structured reef fish populations: an illustration of the "larval subsidy" effect. Ecological Modelling 205 3-4 (2007) 381-396
17. Saaty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process (1980), McGraw-Hill, New York
18. Weimer D.L. Policy analysis and evidence: a craft perspective. Policy Studies Journal 26 1 (1998) 114-128
19. Vaidya O.S., and Kumar S. Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research 169 1 (2006) 1-29
20. Liberatore M.J., and Nydick R.L. The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research 189 1 (2008) 194-207
21. Ho W. Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research 186 1 (2008) 211-228
22. Leung P., Muraoka J., Nakamoto S.T., and Pooley S. Evaluating fisheries management options in Hawaii using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Fisheries Research 36 2-3 (1998) 171-183
23. Soma K. How to involve stakeholders in fisheries management - a country case study in Trinidad and Tobago. Marine Policy 27 1 (2003) 47-58
24. Mardle S., Pascoe S., and Herrero I. Management objective importance in fisheries: an evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Environmental Management 33 1 (2004) 1-11
25. Nielsen J.R., and Mathiesen C. Stakeholder preferences for Danish fisheries management of sand eel and Norway pout. Fisheries Research 77 1 (2006) 92-101
26. Duke J.M., and Aull-Hyde R. Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Ecological Economics 42 1-2 (2002) 131-145
27. Solnes J. Environmental quality indexing of large industrial development alternatives using AHP. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23 3 (2003) 283-303
28. USDA. Information technology capital planning and investment control: guide for fiscal year 2009 (2007), Office of the Chief Information Officer, USDA. http://www.ocio.usda.gov/cpic/doc/Appendix_E_COST_BENEFIT_ANALYSIS.doc Available from:
29. Lane D.E., and Stephenson R.L. A framework for risk analysis in fisheries decision-making. ICES Journal of Marine Science 55 (1998) 1-13
30. Fletcher W.J. The application of qualitative risk assessment methodology to prioritize issues for fisheries management. ICES Journal of Marine Science 62 (2005) 1576-1587
31. Forman E., and Peniwati K. Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 108 1 (1998) 165-169
32. Aull-Hyde R., Erdogan S., and Duke J.M. An experiment on the consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 171 1 (2006) 290-295
33. Holland D., and Schnier K.E. Individual habitat quotas for fisheries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 51 1 (2006) 72-92
34. Steele K, Carmel Y, Cross J., Wilcox C. Uses and misuses of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision-making. Risk Analysis, in press, doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01130.x. Available from: .
35. Nishizawa E., Kurokawa T., and Yabe M. Policies and resident's willingness to pay for restoring the ecosystem damaged by alien fish in Lake Biwa, Japan. Environmental Science and Policy 9 5 (2006) 448-456
36. Azis I.J. Analytic hierarchy process in the benefit-cost framework: a post evaluation of the trans-Sumatra highway project. European Journal of Operational Resource 48 (1990) 38-48
37. Saaty T.L. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process (2000), RWS Publications, Pittsburgh