Integrating logical representations with probabilistic information using Markov logic

Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computational Semantics, IWCS 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 105-114

  Garrette, Dan ^a   Erk, Katrin ^a   Mooney, Raymond ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; FORMAL LOGIC; MARKOV PROCESSES; SEMANTICS;

DISCOURSE REPRESENTATION; DISTRIBUTIONAL MODELS; LOGICAL REPRESENTATIONS; MARKOV LOGIC NETWORKS; NATURAL LANGUAGE SEMANTICS; PROBABILISTIC INFORMATION; PROBABILISTIC KNOWLEDGE; PROBABILISTIC MODELS;

COMPUTER CIRCUITS;

EID: 84867306903     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Bos, J., S. Clark, M. Steedman, J. R. Curran, and J. Hockenmaier (2004). Wide-coverage semantic representations from a CCG parser. In Proceedings of COLING 2004, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1240-1246.
2. Bos, J. and K. Markert (2005). Recognising textual entailment with logical inference. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2005, pp. 628-635.
3. Clark, S. and J. R. Curran (2004). Parsing the WSJ using CCG and log-linear models. In Proceedings of ACL 2004, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 104-111.
4. Dagan, I., O. Glickman, and B. Magnini (2005). The pascal recognising textual entailment challenge. In In Proceedings of the PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment.
5. Erk, K. and S. Padó (2008). A structured vector space model for word meaning in context. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2008, Honolulu, HI, pp. 897-906.
6. Erk, K. and S. Padó (2010). Exemplar-based models for word meaning in context. In Proceedings of ACL 2010, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 92-97.
7. Getoor, L. and B. Taskar (Eds.) (2007). Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Hobbs, J. R., M. Stickel, D. Appelt, and P. Martin (1993). Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelli-gence 63(1-2), 69-142.
9. Hovy, E., M. Marcus, M. Palmer, L. Ramshaw, and R.Weischedel (2006). Ontonotes: The 90% solution. In Proceedings of HLT/NAACL 2006, pp. 57-60.
10. Kamp, H. and U. Reyle (1993). From Discourse to Logic; An Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and DRT. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
11. Kok, S., P. Singla, M. Richardson, and P. Domingos (2005). The Alchemy system for statistical relational AI. Technical report, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington. http://www.cs.washington.edu/ai/alchemy.
12. Landauer, T. and S. Dumais (1997). A solution to Platos problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 104(2), 211-240.
13. Lund, K. and C. Burgess (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical cooccurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 28, 203-208.
14. MacCartney, B. and C. D. Manning (2009). An extended model of natural logic. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS-8), pp. 140-156.
15. Miller, G. A. (2009). Wordnet-about us. http://wordnet.princeton.edu.
16. Mitchell, J. and M. Lapata (2008). Vector-based models of semantic composition. In Proceedings of ACL, pp. 236-244.
17. Nairn, R., C. Condoravdi, and L. Karttunen (2006). Computing relative polarity for textual inference. In Proceedings of Inference in Computational Semantics (ICoS-5), Buxton, UK.
18. Poon, H. and P. Domingos (2009). Unsupervised semantic parsing. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2009, pp. 1-10.
19. Richardson, M. and P. Domingos (2006). Markov logic networks. Machine Learning 62, 107-136.
20. Thater, S., H. Fürstenau, and M. Pinkal (2010). Contextualizing semantic representations using syntactically enriched vector models. In Proceedings of ACL 2010, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 948-957.