Enabling and supporting remote classroom teaching observation: Live video conferencing uses in initial teacher education

Technology, Pedagogy and Education

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 351-360

  Wang, RuoLan ^a   Wiesemes, Rolf ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b Hockerill Anglo European College   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

initial teacher education; live observation; video conferencing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867269985     PISSN: 1475939X     EISSN: 17475139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2012.719397     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Adamczyk, P. 2005. The In-School Teacher Education Programme, Brighton: University of Sussex.
2. Barnes, S.B. 1997. Douglas Carl Engelbart: Developing the underlying concepts for contemporary computing. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 19(3): 16-26.
3. British Educational Research Association. (2004). Revised ethical guidelines for educational research. Retrieved fromhttp://www.bera.ac.uk/files/guidelines/ethica1.pdf
4. Brown, J.S., Collins, A. and Duguid, P. 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18: 32-42.
5. Coyle, D. (2004). Redefining classroom boundaries: Learning to teach using new technologies. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 32, 1-24. Retrieved fromhttp://www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/articles/noma/tlo.coyle.html
6. Cullimore, D. (1999, September). An evaluation of the use of new technologies to support mentorship in teacher training. British Educational Research Association Conference, University of Sussex, Brighton.
7. Hu, C. and Wong, A.F.L. 2006. Video conferencing by student teachers: Does it make any difference?. New Horizons in Education, 53: 42-56.
8. Humphreys, M. and Hyland, T. 2002. Theory, practice and performance in teaching: Professionalism, intuition, and jazz. Educational Studies, 28: 5-15.
9. Hunter, J. and Beveridge, S. 2008. Connected classrooms creating learning communities using video conferencing technology and quality teaching. Scan, 27(4): 4-7.
10. Kolb, D.A. 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, Mahwah, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11. Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, London: Sage Publications.
12. Kvale, S. 1996. InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing, London: Sage Publications.
13. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Lee, P. (1997, September-October). A small world-Technology breaking down classroom walls. Building Communities: National Computer Studies Teachers Conference 1997, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove.
15. Marsh, B., Mitchell, N. and Adamczyk, P. 2009. Interactive video technology: Enhancing professional learning in initial teacher education. Computers and Education, 54: 742-748.
16. Mitchell, N., Marsh, B., Hobson, A., & Sorensen, P. (2008, September). 'Bringing theory to life?' Findings from the evaluation of the University of Sussex In-School Teacher Education Programme (InSTEP). British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Edinburgh.
17. Morgan, D. 1997. Focus groups as qualitative research, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Wang, R., Dunne, L., & Rowe, J. (2008). The Exeter pathfinder journey. Retrieved from Higher Education Academy website:http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/ourwork/learningandtech/completed/pathfinder/Journey_Reports/Exeter_UPDATED.pdf
19. Wenger, E. 1999. Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Wiesemes, R., & Wang, R. (2010). Video conferencing uses in initial teacher education: Sociocultural processes of mimicking and improvisation. International Journal of Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, 6. Retrieved from journal website:http://seminar.net/
21. Wright, N. and Cordeaux, C. 1996. Rethinking video-conferencing: Lessons learned from initial teacher education. Innovations in Education and Training International, 33: 194-202.