A new shortened version of the Boston Naming Test for those aged over 65: An approach from item response theory;Nueva versión reducida del test de denominación de Boston para mayores de 65 años: Aproximación desde la teoría de respuesta al ítem

Revista de Neurologia

Volumn 55, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 399-407

  Fernández Blázquez, Miguel Ángel ^a   Ruiz Sánchez de León, José M ^b   López Pina, José A ^b   Llanero Luque, Marcos ^b   Montenegro Peña, Mercedes ^b   Montejo Carrasco, Pedro ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b Centro de Prevencion del Deterioro Cognitivo   (Spain)

Author keywords

Ageing; Anomia; Aphasia; Boston naming test; Dementia; Item response theory; Mild cognitive impairment; Naming; Neuropsychological evaluation

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; AGE; AGED; APHASIA; ARTICLE; BOSTON NAMING TEST; GERIATRIC PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; RELIABILITY; SPEECH ANALYSIS;

EID: 84867258080     PISSN: 02100010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.33588/rn.5507.2012075     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Vendrell-Brucet JM. Las afasias: semiología y tipos clínicos. Rev Neurol 2001; 32: 980-6.
2. Goodglass H, Kaplan E. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1972.
3. Benson DF, Geschwind N. Aphasia and related cortical disturbances. In Baker AB, Baker LH, eds. Clinical neurology. New York: Harper & Row; 1971. p. 112-40.
4. Head H. Aphasia and kindred disorders of speech. London: Cambridge University Press; 1926.
5. Luria AR. Basic problems of neurolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton; 1976.
6. Shafto MA, Burke DM, Stamatakis EA, Tam P, Tyler LK. On the tip-of-the-tongue: neural correlates of increased word-finding failures in normal aging. J Cogn Neurosci 2007; 19: 2060-70.
7. Zec RF, Markwell SJ, Burkett NR, Larsen DL. A longitudinal Tabla IV. Puntos de corte de la nueva versión reducida del test de denominación de Boston para su aplicación clínica. 65-72 años (n = 149) 73-80 años (n = 183) ≥ 81 años (n = 123) Estudios primarios Bachiller/estudios superiores Estudios primarios Bachiller/estudios superiores Estudios primarios Bachiller/estudios superiores n 76 73 119 64 66 57 Media ± DE 12,29 ± 1,84 13,41 ± 1,87 11,29 ± 2,38 12,30 ± 1,67 10,83 ± 2,21 12,21 ± 1,85 Punto de corte BNT-15 9 11 8 10 7 9 BNT: test de denominación de Boston; DE: desviación estándar. study of confrontation naming in the 'normal' elderly. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2005; 11: 716-26.
8. Reilly J, Peelle JE, Antonucci SM, Grossman M. Anomia as a marker of distinct semantic memory impairments in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia. Neuropsychology 2011; 25: 413-26.
9. Taler V, Phillips NA. Language performance in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a comparative review. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2008; 30: 501-56.
10. Moreno-Martínez FJ, Tallón-Barranco A, Frank A. Enfermedad de Alzheimer, deterioro categorial y variables relevantes en la denominación de objetos. Rev Neurol 2007; 44: 129-33.
11. Fernández-Turrado T, Tejero-Juste C, Santos-Lasaosa S, Pérez-Lázaro C, Piñol-Ripoll G, Mostacero-Miguel E, et al. Lenguaje y deterioro cognitivo: un estudio semiológico en denominación visual. Rev Neurol 2006; 42: 578-83.
12. Arvanitakis Z. Update on frontotemporal dementia. Neurologist 2010; 16: 16-22.
13. Donaire-Temprado AM, Gil-Saladié D. Afasia primaria progresiva asociada a degeneración corticobasal. Rev Neurol 2001; 32: 1051-4.
14. Klebic J, Salihovic N, Softic R, Salihovic D. Aphasia disorders outcome after stroke. Med Arch 2011; 65: 283-6.
15. Pérez-Andrade MA, Poblano-Luna A. Afasia e hipoacusia secundarias a traumatismo craneoencefálico en niños y adolescentes. Rev Neurol 2007; 45: 62-4.
16. Piñol-Ripoll G, Pérez-Lázaro C, Beltrán-Marín I, López del Val LJ, Pascual-Millán LF, Mostacero-Miguel E. Afasia como única manifestación de status epiléptico parcial. Rev Neurol 2004; 39: 1096-7.
17. Cuetos F. Neuropsicología cognitiva del lenguaje. In Cuetos F, ed. Psicolingüística del español. Madrid: Trotta; 1999. p. 535-70.
18. Cuetos F. Anomia: la dificultad para recordar las palabras. Madrid: TEA Ediciones; 2003.
19. Warrington E, Merle J. VOSP: batería de tests para percepción visual objetos y espacio. Madrid: TEA Ediciones; 1994.
20. Howard D, Patterson K. Pyramids and palm trees: a test of semantic access from pictures and words. Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test; 1992.
21. Facal-Mayo D, Juncos-Rabadán O, Álvarez M, Pereiro-Rozas AX, Díaz-Fernández F. Efectos del envejecimiento en el acceso al léxico. El fenómeno de la punta de la lengua ante los nombres propios. Rev Neurol 2006; 43: 719-23.
22. Kaplan EF, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. The Boston Naming Test. Experimental edition. Boston: Kaplan & Goodglass; 1978.
23. Kaplan EF, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1983.
24. Goodglass H, Kaplan E. Evaluación de la afasia y de trastornos relacionados. Madrid: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 1996.
25. Goodglass H. Evaluación de la afasia y trastornos relacionados. Buenos Aires: Panamericana; 2005.
26. Au R, Joung P, Nicholas M, Obler LK, Kass R, Albert ML. Naming ability across the adult life span. Aging & Cognition 1995; 2: 300-11.
27. Kent PS, Luszcz MA. A review of the Boston Naming Test and multiple-occasion normative data for older adults on 15-item versions. Clin Neuropsychol 2002; 16: 555-74.
28. Zec RF, Burkett NR, Markwell SJ, Larsen DL. Normative data for age, education, and gender on the Boston Naming Test. Clin Neuropsychol 2007; 21: 617-37.
29. Pineda DA, Mejía-Mag SE, Rosselli M, Ardila A, Romero MG, Pérez C. Variabilidad en la prueba de Boston para el diagnóstico de las afasias en adultos laboralmente activos. Rev Neurol 1998; 26: 962-70.
30. Zec RF, Burkett NR, Markwell SJ, Larsen DL. A cross-sectional study of the effects of age, education, and gender on the Boston Naming Test. Clin Neuropsychol 2007; 21: 569-98.
31. Saxton KW, Ratcliff G, Munro CA, Coffey EC, Becker JT, Fried L, et al. Normative data on the Boston Naming Test and two equivalent 30-item short forms. Clin Neuropsychol 2000; 14: 526-34.
32. Graves RE, Bezeau SC, Fogarty J, Blair R. Boston Naming Test short forms: a comparison of previous forms with new item response theory based forms. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2004; 26: 891-902.
33. Williams BW, Mack W, Henderson VW. Boston Naming Test in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia 1989; 27: 1073-9.
34. Mack WJ, Freed DM, Williams BW, Henderson VW. Boston Naming Test: shortened versions for use in Alzheimer's disease. J Gerontol Psychol Sci 1992; 47: 154-8.
35. Fastenau PS, Denburg NL, Mauer BA. Parallel short forms for the Boston Naming Test: psychometric properties and norms for older adults. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 1998; 20: 828-34.
36. Lansing AE, Ivnik RJ, Cullum CM, Randolph C. An empirically derived short form of the Boston Naming Test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1999; 14: 481-7.
37. Nebreda MC, García-Caballero A, Asensio E, Revilla P, Rodríguez-Girondo M, Mateos R. A short-form version of the Boston Naming Test for language screening in dementia in a bilingual rural community in Galicia (Spain). Int Psychogeriatr 2011; 23: 435-41.
38. Hobson VL, Hall JR, Harvey M, Cullum CM, Lacritz L, Massman PJ, et al. An examination of the Boston Naming Test: calculation of 'estimated' 60-item score from 30-and 15-item scores in a cognitively impaired population. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011; 26: 351-5.
39. Embretson SE. The new rules of measurement. Psychol Assess 1996; 8: 341-9.
40. Thompson B. Stepwise regression and stepwise discriminant analysis need not apply here: a guidelines editorial. Educ Psychol Meas 1995; 55: 525-34.
41. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol 1999; 56: 303-8.
42. Folstein M, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. 'Mini-Mental State': a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatry Res 1975; 12: 189-98.
43. Solomon PR, Hirschoff A, Kelly B, Relin M, Brush M, DeVeaux RD, et al. A 7 minute neurocognitive screening battery highly sensitive to Alzheimer's disease. Arch Neurol 1998; 55: 349-55.
44. Wechsler D. Escala de memoria de Wechsler para Adultos (WMS-III). 3 ed. Madrid: TEA Ediciones; 1999.
45. Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. In Brink TL, ed. Clinical gerontology: a guide to assessment and intervention. New York: Haworth Press; 1986. p. 165-73.
46. Pfeffer RI, Kurosaki TI, Harrah CH, Chance JM, Filos S. Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. J Gerontol 1982; 37: 323-9.
47. Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lea; 2001.
48. De Ayala RJ. The theory and practice of item response theory. New York: Guilford Press; 2009.
49. Crocker L, Algina J. Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1986.
50. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: a practical guide to their development and Use. 4 ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.