Estimating electrical conductivity tensors of biological tissues using microelectrode arrays

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 40, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 2140-2155

  Gilboa, Elad ^a   La Rosa, Patricio S ^b   Nehorai, Arye ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternating optimization; Bidomain model; Biological tissues; Electrical conductivity; Inverse solution; Microelectrode array; Parallel optimization; Tensor field

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATING OPTIMIZATIONS; BIDOMAIN MODELS; BIOLOGICAL TISSUES; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; INVERSE SOLUTION; MICROELECTRODE ARRAY; PARALLEL OPTIMIZATION; TENSOR FIELDS;

ALGORITHMS; BIOELECTRIC POTENTIALS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ESTIMATION; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MICROELECTRODES; OPTIMIZATION; TISSUE;

TENSORS;

ALGORITHM; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; MICROELECTRODE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ANISOTROPY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; MICROELECTRODES; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84867230095     PISSN: 00906964     EISSN: 15739686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-012-0581-9     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aja-Fernandez, S., R. de Luis Garcia, D. Tao, and X. Li. Tensors in Image Processing and Computer Vision. London: Springer, 2009.
2. Arsigny, V., P. Fillard, X. Pennec, and N. Ayache. Log-euclidean metrics for fast and simple calculus on diffusion tensors. Magn. Reson. Med. 56:411-421, 2006.
3. Barmpoutis, A., B. C. Vemuri, T. M. Shepherd, and J. R. Forder. Tensor splines for interpolation and approximation of DT-MRI with applications to segmentation of isolated rat hippocampi. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 26(11):1537-1546, 2007.
4. Batchelor, P. G., M. Moakher, D. Atkinson, F. Cala-mante, and A. Connelly. A rigorous framework for diffusion tensor calculus. Magn. Reson. Med. 53:221-225, 2005.
5. Bazhenov, M., P. Lonjers, S. Skorheim, C. Bedard, and A. Destexhe. Non-homogeneous extracellular resistivity affects the current-source density profiles of updown state oscillations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 369(1952):3802-3819, 2011.
6. Bedard, C., and A. Destexhe. Generalized theory for current-source- density analysis in brain tissue. Phys. Rev. E 84(4):041909, 2011.
7. Berdondini, L., K. Imfeld, A. Maccione, M. Tedesco, S. Neukom, M. Koudelka-Hep, and S. Martinoia. Active pixel sensor array for high spatio-temporal resolution electrophysiological recordings from single cell to large scale neuronal networks. Lab Chip 9:2644-2651, 2009.
8. Bezdek, J. C., and R. J. Hathaway. Convergence of alternating optimization. Neural Parallel Sci. Comput. 11:351-368, 2003. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=964885.964886.
9. Bressloff, P. C. Traveling fronts and wave propagation failure in an inhomogeneous neural network. Phys. D 155:83-100, 2001.
10. Castleman, K. R. Diginal Image Processing. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1996.
11. de Leeuw, J., and G. Michailides. Block Relaxation Methods in Statistics. Technical Report, Department of Statistics, University of California at Los Angeles, 1993.
12. Dokos, S., and N. H. Lovell. Parameter estimation in cardiac ionic models. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 85(2-3):407-431, 2004. Modelling Cellular and Tissue Function. http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0079610704000306.
13. Graham, L. S., and D. Kilpatrick. Estimation of the bi-domain conductivity parameters of cardiac tissue from extracellular potential distributions initiated by point stimulation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38(12):3630-3648, 2010.
14. Hagmann, P., L. Jonasson, P. Maeder, J. Thiran, V. Wedeen, and R. Meuli. Understanding diffusion MRI imaging techniques: from scalar diffusion-weighted imaging to diffusion tensor imaging and beyond. Radiographics 26:S205-S223, 2006.
15. He, Y., and D. Keyes. Reconstructing parameters of the FitzHugh-Nagumo system from boundary potential measurements. J. Comput. Neurosci. 23:251-264, 2007. doi: 10.1007/s10827-007-0035-9.
16. Imfeld, K., S. Neukom, A. Maccione, Y. Bornat, S. Mar-tinoia, P. Farine, M. Koudelka-Hep, and L. Berdondini. Large-scale, high-resolution data acquisition system for extracellular recording of electrophysiological activity. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55(8):2064-2073, 2008.
17. Julier, S., and J. Uhlmann. Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation. Proc. IEEE 92(3):401-422, 2004.
18. Kaipio, J., and E. Somersalo. Nonstationary Inverse Problems, chapter 4. In: Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems, Vol. 60, edited by S. Antman, J. Mars-den, and L. Sirovich. Berlin: Springer, 2005.
19. La Rosa, P. S., H. Eswaran, H. Preissl, and A. Nehorai. Multiscale forward electromagnetic model of uterine contractions during pregnancy. In revision for BMC Med. Phys.
20. Latash, M. L. Neurophysiological Basis of Movement. Urbana: Human Kinetics Publishers, 2008.
21. Lu, Y., Y. Sato, and S. Amari. Traveling bumps and their collisions in a two-dimensional neural field. Neural Comput. 23(5):1248-60, 2011.
22. Mehra, R. K. Optimal input signals for parameter estimation in dynamic systems-survey and new results. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19:753-768, 1974.
23. Miller, W., and D. Geselowitz. Simulation studies of the electrocardiogram. I. The normal heart. Circ. Res. 43(2): 301-315, 1978.
24. Miller, W., and C. Henriquez. Finite element analysis of bioelectric phenomena. CRC Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. (USA) 18(3):207-233, 1990.
25. Nelles, O. Nonlinear System Identification: From Classical Approaches to Neural Networks and Fuzzy Models. Berlin, New York: Springer, 2001.
26. Nilssen, T., K. Karlsen, T. Mannseth, and X.-C. Tai. Identification of diffusion parameters in a nonlinear convection-diffusion equation using the augmented lagrangian method. Comput. Geosci. 13:317-329, 2009.
27. Nilssen, T. K., and X. C. Tai. Parameter estimation with the augmented Lagrangian method for a parabolic equation. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 124(2):435-453, 2005.
28. Nocedal, J., and S. J. Wright Numerical Optimization. Springer Series in Operations Research. New York: Springer, 2006.
29. Penland, R. C., D. M. Harrild, and C. S. Henriquez. Modeling impulse propagation and extracellular potential distributions in anisotropic cardiac tissue using a finite volume element discretization. Comput. Vis. Sci. 4:215-226, 2002. doi:10.1007/s00791-002-0078-4.
30. Pennec, X., P. Fillard, and N. Ayache. Riemannian framework for tensor computing. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 66:41-66, 2006.
31. Pilkington, T.C. High Performance Computing in Bio-medical Research. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1993.
32. Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
33. Proakis, J. G., and D. K. Manolakis. Digital Signal Processing (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007.
34. Rauch, J., and J. Smoller. Qualitative theory of the Fitz-Hugh-Nagumo equations. Adv. Math. 27:12-44, 1978.
35. Sepulveda, N., B. Roth, and J. Wikswo. Finite element bi-domain calculations. In: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 10th Annual International Conference, 1988.
36. Sitz, A., J. Kurths, and H. U. Voss. Identification of nonlinear spatiotemporal systems via partitioned filtering. Phys. Rev. 68:016202, 2003.
37. Sitz, A., U. Schwarz, J. Kurths, and H. U. Voss. Estimation of parameters and unobserved components for nonlinear systems from noisy time series. Phys. Rev. E 66:016210, 2002.
38. Sjoberg, J., Q. Zhang, L. Ljung, A. Benveniste, B. Deylon, P. Glorennec, H. Hjalmarsson, and A. Juditsky. Nonlinear black-box modeling in system identification: a unified overview. Automatica 31:1691-1724, 1995.
39. Soderstrom, T., and P. Stoica. System Identification. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1989.
40. Strikwerda, J. C. Finite Difference Schemes and Partial Differential Equations. Pacific Grove: Wadsworth and Brooks, 1989.
41. Sun, N. Inverse Problems in Groundwater Modeling. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
42. Tung, L. A bi-domain model for describing ischemic myocardial D-C potentials. Ph.D. dissertation. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1978.
43. Valdes-Sosa, P. A., A. Roebroek, J. Daunizeau, and K. Friston. Effective connectivity: influence, causality and biophysical modeling. NeuroImage 58:339-361, 2011.
44. Vanag, V. K., and I. R. Epstein. Localised patterns in reaction-diffusion systems. Chaos 17:037110, 2007.
45. Willms, A. R., D. J. Baro, R. M. Harris-Warrick, and J. Guckenheimer. An improved parameter estimation method for Hodgkin-Huxley models. J. Comput. Neurosci. 6:145-168, 1999. doi:10.1023/A:1008880518515.