An ethical decision-making model to determine authorship credit in published faculty-student collaborations

Counseling and Values

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 214-228

  Foster, Ryan D ^a,c   Ray, Dee C ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY COMMERCE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^c MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

authorship; faculty student collaborations; publication ethics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867228408     PISSN: 01607960     EISSN: 2161007X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2161-007X.2012.00018.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. American Counseling Association. (2005). ACA code of ethics. Alexandria, VA: Author.
2. American Psychological Association. (1990). Ethical principles of psychologists (amended June 2, 1989). American Psychologist, 45, 390-395.
3. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: Author.
4. Apgar, D., &, Congress, E., (2005). Authorship credit: A national study of social work educators' beliefs. Journal of Social Work Education, 41, 101-112. (Pubitemid 40367171)
5. Corey, G., Corey, M. S., &, Callanan, P., (2003). Issues and ethics in the helping professions (6th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
6. Costa, M. M., &, Gatz, M., (1992). Determination of authorship credit in published dissertations. Psychological Science, 3, 354-357. doi:10.1111j.1467-9280.1992.tb00046.x.
7. Fine, M. A., &, Kurdek, L. A., (2003). Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations. In, A. Kazdin, (Ed.), Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (3rd ed., pp. 791-805). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. Geelhoed, R., Phillips, J., Fischer, A., Shpungin, E., &, Gong, Y., (2007). Authorship decision making: An empirical investigation. Ethics & Behavior, 17, 95-115.
9. Goodyear, R. K., Crego, C. A., &, Johnston, M. W., (1992). Ethical issues in the supervision of student research: A study of critical incidents. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23, 203-210. doi:10.10370735-7028.23.3.203.
10. Holaday, M., &, Yost, T. E., (1995). Authorship credit and ethical guidelines. Counseling and Values, 40, 24-31.
11. Iammarino, N. K., O'Rourke, T. W., Pigg, R. M., &, Weinberg, A. D., (1989). Ethical issues in research and publication. Journal of School Health, 59, 101-105.
12. Jones, K. D., (1999). Ethics in publication. Counseling and Values, 43, 99-106.
13. Nguyen, T., &, Nguyen, T. D., (2006). Authorship ethics: Issues and suggested guidelines for the helping professions. Counseling and Values, 50, 208-216.
14. Oberlander, S., &, Spencer, R., (2006). Graduate students and the culture of authorship. Ethics & Behavior, 16, 217-232. doi:10. 1207s15327019eb1603-3. (Pubitemid 44886256)
15. Sandler, J., &, Russell, B., (2005). Faculty-student collaborations: Ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit. Ethics & Behavior, 15, 65-80. doi:10.1207s15327019eb1501-5. (Pubitemid 40855346)
16. Shadish, W., (1994). APA ethics and student authorship on master's theses. American Psychologist, 49, 1096. doi:10.10370003-066X.49.12.1096.
17. Spiegel, D., &, Keith-Spiegel, P., (1970). Assignment of publication credits: Ethics and practices of psychologists. American Psychologist, 25, 738-747. doi:10.1037h0029769.
18. Tryon, G., Bishop, J., &, Hatfield, T., (2007). Doctoral students' beliefs about authorship credit for dissertations. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 1, 184-192. doi:10.10371931-3918.1.3.184.
19. Welfel, E. R., (2006). Ethics in counseling and psychotherapy: Standards, research, and emerging issues (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
20. Winston, R. B., Jr., (1985). A suggested procedure for determining order of authorship in research publications. Journal of Counseling and Development, 63, 515-518.
21. Zuckerman, H. A., (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York, NY: Free Press.